diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py | 770 |
1 files changed, 770 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cbf7f7bcf --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py @@ -0,0 +1,770 @@ +import asyncio +import enum +import logging +import typing as t +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, call, patch + +import aiohttp +import discord + +from bot.constants import Colours +from bot.exts.moderation import incidents +from tests.helpers import ( + MockAsyncWebhook, + MockAttachment, + MockBot, + MockMember, + MockMessage, + MockReaction, + MockRole, + MockTextChannel, + MockUser, +) + + +class MockAsyncIterable: + """ + Helper for mocking asynchronous for loops. + + It does not appear that the `unittest` library currently provides anything that would + allow us to simply mock an async iterator, such as `discord.TextChannel.history`. + + We therefore write our own helper to wrap a regular synchronous iterable, and feed + its values via `__anext__` rather than `__next__`. + + This class was written for the purposes of testing the `Incidents` cog - it may not + be generic enough to be placed in the `tests.helpers` module. + """ + + def __init__(self, messages: t.Iterable): + """Take a sync iterable to be wrapped.""" + self.iter_messages = iter(messages) + + def __aiter__(self): + """Return `self` as we provide the `__anext__` method.""" + return self + + async def __anext__(self): + """ + Feed the next item, or raise `StopAsyncIteration`. + + Since we're wrapping a sync iterator, it will communicate that it has been depleted + by raising a `StopIteration`. The `async for` construct does not expect it, and we + therefore need to substitute it for the appropriate exception type. + """ + try: + return next(self.iter_messages) + except StopIteration: + raise StopAsyncIteration + + +class MockSignal(enum.Enum): + A = "A" + B = "B" + + +mock_404 = discord.NotFound( + response=MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), # Mock the erroneous response + message="Not found", +) + + +class TestDownloadFile(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Collection of tests for the `download_file` helper function.""" + + async def test_download_file_success(self): + """If `to_file` succeeds, function returns the acquired `discord.File`.""" + file = MagicMock(discord.File, filename="bigbadlemon.jpg") + attachment = MockAttachment(to_file=AsyncMock(return_value=file)) + + acquired_file = await incidents.download_file(attachment) + self.assertIs(file, acquired_file) + + async def test_download_file_404(self): + """If `to_file` encounters a 404, function handles the exception & returns None.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(to_file=AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404)) + + acquired_file = await incidents.download_file(attachment) + self.assertIsNone(acquired_file) + + async def test_download_file_fail(self): + """If `to_file` fails on a non-404 error, function logs the exception & returns None.""" + arbitrary_error = discord.HTTPException(MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), "Arbitrary API error") + attachment = MockAttachment(to_file=AsyncMock(side_effect=arbitrary_error)) + + with self.assertLogs(logger=incidents.log, level=logging.ERROR): + acquired_file = await incidents.download_file(attachment) + + self.assertIsNone(acquired_file) + + +class TestMakeEmbed(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Collection of tests for the `make_embed` helper function.""" + + async def test_make_embed_actioned(self): + """Embed is coloured green and footer contains 'Actioned' when `outcome=Signal.ACTIONED`.""" + embed, file = await incidents.make_embed(MockMessage(), incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(embed.colour.value, Colours.soft_green) + self.assertIn("Actioned", embed.footer.text) + + async def test_make_embed_not_actioned(self): + """Embed is coloured red and footer contains 'Rejected' when `outcome=Signal.NOT_ACTIONED`.""" + embed, file = await incidents.make_embed(MockMessage(), incidents.Signal.NOT_ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(embed.colour.value, Colours.soft_red) + self.assertIn("Rejected", embed.footer.text) + + async def test_make_embed_content(self): + """Incident content appears as embed description.""" + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident") + embed, file = await incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(incident.content, embed.description) + + async def test_make_embed_with_attachment_succeeds(self): + """Incident's attachment is downloaded and displayed in the embed's image field.""" + file = MagicMock(discord.File, filename="bigbadjoe.jpg") + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="bigbadjoe.jpg") + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident", attachments=[attachment]) + + # Patch `download_file` to return our `file` + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.download_file", AsyncMock(return_value=file)): + embed, returned_file = await incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertIs(file, returned_file) + self.assertEqual("attachment://bigbadjoe.jpg", embed.image.url) + + async def test_make_embed_with_attachment_fails(self): + """Incident's attachment fails to download, proxy url is linked instead.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(proxy_url="discord.com/bigbadjoe.jpg") + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident", attachments=[attachment]) + + # Patch `download_file` to return None as if the download failed + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.download_file", AsyncMock(return_value=None)): + embed, returned_file = await incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertIsNone(returned_file) + + # The author name field is simply expected to have something in it, we do not assert the message + self.assertGreater(len(embed.author.name), 0) + self.assertEqual(embed.author.url, "discord.com/bigbadjoe.jpg") # However, it should link the exact url + + +@patch("bot.constants.Channels.incidents", 123) +class TestIsIncident(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Collection of tests for the `is_incident` helper function. + + In `setUp`, we will create a mock message which should qualify as an incident. Each + test case will then mutate this instance to make it **not** qualify, in various ways. + + Notice that we patch the #incidents channel id globally for this class. + """ + + def setUp(self) -> None: + """Prepare a mock message which should qualify as an incident.""" + self.incident = MockMessage( + channel=MockTextChannel(id=123), + content="this is an incident", + author=MockUser(bot=False), + pinned=False, + ) + + def test_is_incident_true(self): + """Message qualifies as an incident if unchanged.""" + self.assertTrue(incidents.is_incident(self.incident)) + + def check_false(self): + """Assert that `self.incident` does **not** qualify as an incident.""" + self.assertFalse(incidents.is_incident(self.incident)) + + def test_is_incident_false_channel(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if sent outside of #incidents.""" + self.incident.channel = MockTextChannel(id=456) + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_content(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if content begins with hash symbol.""" + self.incident.content = "# this is a comment message" + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_author(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if author is a bot.""" + self.incident.author = MockUser(bot=True) + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_pinned(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if it is pinned.""" + self.incident.pinned = True + self.check_false() + + +class TestOwnReactions(unittest.TestCase): + """Assertions for the `own_reactions` function.""" + + def test_own_reactions(self): + """Only bot's own emoji are extracted from the input incident.""" + reactions = ( + MockReaction(emoji="A", me=True), + MockReaction(emoji="B", me=True), + MockReaction(emoji="C", me=False), + ) + message = MockMessage(reactions=reactions) + self.assertSetEqual(incidents.own_reactions(message), {"A", "B"}) + + +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.ALL_SIGNALS", {"A", "B"}) +class TestHasSignals(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Assertions for the `has_signals` function. + + We patch `ALL_SIGNALS` globally. Each test function then patches `own_reactions` + as appropriate. + """ + + def test_has_signals_true(self): + """True when `own_reactions` returns all emoji in `ALL_SIGNALS`.""" + message = MockMessage() + own_reactions = MagicMock(return_value={"A", "B"}) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", own_reactions): + self.assertTrue(incidents.has_signals(message)) + + def test_has_signals_false(self): + """False when `own_reactions` does not return all emoji in `ALL_SIGNALS`.""" + message = MockMessage() + own_reactions = MagicMock(return_value={"A", "C"}) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", own_reactions): + self.assertFalse(incidents.has_signals(message)) + + +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Signal", MockSignal) +class TestAddSignals(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """ + Assertions for the `add_signals` coroutine. + + These are all fairly similar and could go into a single test function, but I found the + patching & sub-testing fairly awkward in that case and decided to split them up + to avoid unnecessary syntax noise. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """Prepare a mock incident message for tests to use.""" + self.incident = MockMessage() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value=set())) + async def test_add_signals_missing(self): + """All emoji are added when none are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_has_calls([call("A"), call("B")]) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value={"A"})) + async def test_add_signals_partial(self): + """Only missing emoji are added when some are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_has_calls([call("B")]) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value={"A", "B"})) + async def test_add_signals_present(self): + """No emoji are added when all are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_not_called() + + +class TestIncidents(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """ + Tests for bound methods of the `Incidents` cog. + + Use this as a base class for `Incidents` tests - it will prepare a fresh instance + for each test function, but not make any assertions on its own. Tests can mutate + the instance as they wish. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """ + Prepare a fresh `Incidents` instance for each test. + + Note that this will not schedule `crawl_incidents` in the background, as everything + is being mocked. The `crawl_task` attribute will end up being None. + """ + self.cog_instance = incidents.Incidents(MockBot()) + + +@patch("asyncio.sleep", AsyncMock()) # Prevent the coro from sleeping to speed up the test +class TestCrawlIncidents(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.crawl_incidents` coroutine. + + Apart from `test_crawl_incidents_waits_until_cache_ready`, all tests in this class + will patch the return values of `is_incident` and `has_signal` and then observe + whether the `AsyncMock` for `add_signals` was awaited or not. + + The `add_signals` mock is added by each test separately to ensure it is clean (has not + been awaited by another test yet). The mock can be reset, but this appears to be the + cleaner way. + + For each test, we inject a mock channel with a history of 1 message only (see: `setUp`). + """ + + def setUp(self): + """For each test, ensure `bot.get_channel` returns a channel with 1 arbitrary message.""" + super().setUp() # First ensure we get `cog_instance` from parent + + incidents_history = MagicMock(return_value=MockAsyncIterable([MockMessage()])) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(history=incidents_history)) + + async def test_crawl_incidents_waits_until_cache_ready(self): + """ + The coroutine will await the `wait_until_guild_available` event. + + Since this task is schedule in the `__init__`, it is critical that it waits for the + cache to be ready, so that it can safely get the #incidents channel. + """ + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + self.cog_instance.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)) # Message doesn't qualify + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=False)) + async def test_crawl_incidents_noop_if_is_not_incident(self): + """Signals are not added for a non-incident message.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # Message qualifies + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # But already has signals + async def test_crawl_incidents_noop_if_message_already_has_signals(self): + """Signals are not added for messages which already have them.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # Message qualifies + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=False)) # And doesn't have signals + async def test_crawl_incidents_add_signals_called(self): + """Message has signals added as it does not have them yet and qualifies as an incident.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_awaited_once() + + +class TestArchive(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.archive` coroutine.""" + + async def test_archive_webhook_not_found(self): + """ + Method recovers and returns False when the webhook is not found. + + Implicitly, this also tests that the error is handled internally and doesn't + propagate out of the method, which is just as important. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404) + self.assertFalse( + await self.cog_instance.archive(incident=MockMessage(), outcome=MagicMock(), actioned_by=MockMember()) + ) + + async def test_archive_relays_incident(self): + """ + If webhook is found, method relays `incident` properly. + + This test will assert that the fetched webhook's `send` method is fed the correct arguments, + and that the `archive` method returns True. + """ + webhook = MockAsyncWebhook() + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(return_value=webhook) # Patch in our webhook + + # Define our own `incident` to be archived + incident = MockMessage( + content="this is an incident", + author=MockUser(name="author_name", avatar_url="author_avatar"), + id=123, + ) + built_embed = MagicMock(discord.Embed, id=123) # We patch `make_embed` to return this + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.make_embed", AsyncMock(return_value=(built_embed, None))): + archive_return = await self.cog_instance.archive(incident, MagicMock(value="A"), MockMember()) + + # Now we check that the webhook was given the correct args, and that `archive` returned True + webhook.send.assert_called_once_with( + embed=built_embed, + username="author_name", + avatar_url="author_avatar", + file=None, + ) + self.assertTrue(archive_return) + + async def test_archive_clyde_username(self): + """ + The archive webhook username is cleansed using `sub_clyde`. + + Discord will reject any webhook with "clyde" in the username field, as it impersonates + the official Clyde bot. Since we do not control what the username will be (the incident + author name is used), we must ensure the name is cleansed, otherwise the relay may fail. + + This test assumes the username is passed as a kwarg. If this test fails, please review + whether the passed argument is being retrieved correctly. + """ + webhook = MockAsyncWebhook() + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(return_value=webhook) + + message_from_clyde = MockMessage(author=MockUser(name="clyde the great")) + await self.cog_instance.archive(message_from_clyde, MagicMock(incidents.Signal), MockMember()) + + self.assertNotIn("clyde", webhook.send.call_args.kwargs["username"]) + + +class TestMakeConfirmationTask(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.make_confirmation_task` method. + + Writing tests for this method is difficult, as it mostly just delegates the provided + information elsewhere. There is very little internal logic. Whether our approach + works conceptually is difficult to prove using unit tests. + """ + + def test_make_confirmation_task_check(self): + """ + The internal check will recognize the passed incident. + + This is a little tricky - we first pass a message with a specific `id` in, and then + retrieve the built check from the `call_args` of the `wait_for` method. This relies + on the check being passed as a kwarg. + + Once the check is retrieved, we assert that it gives True for our incident's `id`, + and False for any other. + + If this function begins to fail, first check that `created_check` is being retrieved + correctly. It should be the function that is built locally in the tested method. + """ + self.cog_instance.make_confirmation_task(MockMessage(id=123)) + + self.cog_instance.bot.wait_for.assert_called_once() + created_check = self.cog_instance.bot.wait_for.call_args.kwargs["check"] + + # The `message_id` matches the `id` of our incident + self.assertTrue(created_check(payload=MagicMock(message_id=123))) + + # This `message_id` does not match + self.assertFalse(created_check(payload=MagicMock(message_id=0))) + + +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.ALLOWED_ROLES", {1, 2}) +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", AsyncMock()) # Generic awaitable +class TestProcessEvent(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.process_event` coroutine.""" + + async def test_process_event_bad_role(self): + """The reaction is removed when the author lacks all allowed roles.""" + incident = MockMessage() + member = MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=0)]) # Must have role 1 or 2 + + await self.cog_instance.process_event("reaction", incident, member) + incident.remove_reaction.assert_called_once_with("reaction", member) + + async def test_process_event_bad_emoji(self): + """ + The reaction is removed when an invalid emoji is used. + + This requires that we pass in a `member` with valid roles, as we need the role check + to succeed. + """ + incident = MockMessage() + member = MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) # Member has allowed role + + await self.cog_instance.process_event("invalid_signal", incident, member) + incident.remove_reaction.assert_called_once_with("invalid_signal", member) + + async def test_process_event_no_archive_on_investigating(self): + """Message is not archived on `Signal.INVESTIGATING`.""" + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.archive", AsyncMock()) as mocked_archive: + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.INVESTIGATING.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]), + ) + + mocked_archive.assert_not_called() + + async def test_process_event_no_delete_if_archive_fails(self): + """ + Original message is not deleted when `Incidents.archive` returns False. + + This is the way of signaling that the relay failed, and we should not remove the original, + as that would result in losing the incident record. + """ + incident = MockMessage() + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.archive", AsyncMock(return_value=False)): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=incident, + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + + incident.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_process_event_confirmation_task_is_awaited(self): + """Task given by `Incidents.make_confirmation_task` is awaited before method exits.""" + mock_task = AsyncMock() + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", mock_task): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + + mock_task.assert_awaited() + + async def test_process_event_confirmation_task_timeout_is_handled(self): + """ + Confirmation task `asyncio.TimeoutError` is handled gracefully. + + We have `make_confirmation_task` return a mock with a side effect, and then catch the + exception should it propagate out of `process_event`. This is so that we can then manually + fail the test with a more informative message than just the plain traceback. + """ + mock_task = AsyncMock(side_effect=asyncio.TimeoutError()) + + try: + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", mock_task): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + except asyncio.TimeoutError: + self.fail("TimeoutError was not handled gracefully, and propagated out of `process_event`!") + + +class TestResolveMessage(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.resolve_message` coroutine.""" + + async def test_resolve_message_pass_message_id(self): + """Method will call `_get_message` with the passed `message_id`.""" + await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message.assert_called_once_with(123) + + async def test_resolve_message_in_cache(self): + """ + No API call is made if the queried message exists in the cache. + + We mock the `_get_message` return value regardless of input. Whether it finds the message + internally is considered d.py's responsibility, not ours. + """ + cached_message = MockMessage(id=123) + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=cached_message) + + return_value = await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + + self.assertIs(return_value, cached_message) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel.assert_not_called() # The `fetch_message` line was never hit + + async def test_resolve_message_not_in_cache(self): + """ + The message is retrieved from the API if it isn't cached. + + This is desired behaviour for messages which exist, but were sent before the bot's + current session. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + # API returns our message + uncached_message = MockMessage() + fetch_message = AsyncMock(return_value=uncached_message) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + retrieved_message = await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + self.assertIs(retrieved_message, uncached_message) + + async def test_resolve_message_doesnt_exist(self): + """ + If the API returns a 404, the function handles it gracefully and returns None. + + This is an edge-case happening with racing events - event A will relay the message + to the archive and delete the original. Once event B acquires the `event_lock`, + it will not find the message in the cache, and will ask the API. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + fetch_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + self.assertIsNone(await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123)) + + async def test_resolve_message_fetch_fails(self): + """ + Non-404 errors are handled, logged & None is returned. + + In contrast with a 404, this should make an error-level log. We assert that at least + one such log was made - we do not make any assertions about the log's message. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + arbitrary_error = discord.HTTPException( + response=MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), + message="Arbitrary error", + ) + fetch_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=arbitrary_error) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + with self.assertLogs(logger=incidents.log, level=logging.ERROR): + self.assertIsNone(await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123)) + + +@patch("bot.constants.Channels.incidents", 123) +class TestOnRawReactionAdd(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.on_raw_reaction_add` listener. + + Writing tests for this listener comes with additional complexity due to the listener + awaiting the `crawl_task` task. See `asyncSetUp` for further details, which attempts + to make unit testing this function possible. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """ + Prepare & assign `payload` attribute. + + This attribute represents an *ideal* payload which will not be rejected by the + listener. As each test will receive a fresh instance, it can be mutated to + observe how the listener's behaviour changes with different attributes on + the passed payload. + """ + super().setUp() # Ensure `cog_instance` is assigned + + self.payload = MagicMock( + discord.RawReactionActionEvent, + channel_id=123, # Patched at class level + message_id=456, + member=MockMember(bot=False), + emoji="reaction", + ) + + async def asyncSetUp(self): # noqa: N802 + """ + Prepare an empty task and assign it as `crawl_task`. + + It appears that the `unittest` framework does not provide anything for mocking + asyncio tasks. An `AsyncMock` instance can be called and then awaited, however, + it does not provide the `done` method or any other parts of the `asyncio.Task` + interface. + + Although we do not need to make any assertions about the task itself while + testing the listener, the code will still await it and call the `done` method, + and so we must inject something that will not fail on either action. + + Note that this is done in an `asyncSetUp`, which runs after `setUp`. + The justification is that creating an actual task requires the event + loop to be ready, which is not the case in the `setUp`. + """ + mock_task = asyncio.create_task(AsyncMock()()) # Mock async func, then a coro + self.cog_instance.crawl_task = mock_task + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_wrong_channel(self): + """ + Events outside of #incidents will be ignored. + + We check this by asserting that `resolve_message` was never queried. + """ + self.payload.channel_id = 0 + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_user_is_bot(self): + """ + Events dispatched by bot accounts will be ignored. + + We check this by asserting that `resolve_message` was never queried. + """ + self.payload.member = MockMember(bot=True) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_message_doesnt_exist(self): + """ + Listener gracefully handles the case where `resolve_message` gives None. + + We check this by asserting that `process_event` was never called. + """ + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=None) + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_message_is_not_an_incident(self): + """ + The event won't be processed if the related message is not an incident. + + This is an edge-case that can happen if someone manually leaves a reaction + on a pinned message, or a comment. + + We check this by asserting that `process_event` was never called. + """ + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=MockMessage()) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)): + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_valid_event_is_processed(self): + """ + If the reaction event is valid, it is passed to `process_event`. + + This is the case when everything goes right: + * The reaction was placed in #incidents, and not by a bot + * The message was found successfully + * The message qualifies as an incident + + Additionally, we check that all arguments were passed as expected. + """ + incident = MockMessage(id=1) + + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=incident) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)): + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_called_with( + "reaction", # Defined in `self.payload` + incident, + self.payload.member, + ) + + +class TestOnMessage(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.on_message` listener. + + Notice the decorators mocking the `is_incident` return value. The `is_incidents` + function is tested in `TestIsIncident` - here we do not worry about it. + """ + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) + async def test_on_message_incident(self): + """Messages qualifying as incidents are passed to `add_signals`.""" + incident = MockMessage() + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) as mock_add_signals: + await self.cog_instance.on_message(incident) + + mock_add_signals.assert_called_once_with(incident) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)) + async def test_on_message_non_incident(self): + """Messages not qualifying as incidents are ignored.""" + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) as mock_add_signals: + await self.cog_instance.on_message(MockMessage()) + + mock_add_signals.assert_not_called() |