aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/bot/bot.py (unfollow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2020-11-19Update workflow status badges in readmeGravatar Sebastiaan Zeeff-1/+7
Our two workflows, Lint and Build, now have separate status badges that link to the latest results from that workflow.
2020-11-16Split lint and build jobs into separate workflowsGravatar Sebastiaan Zeeff-57/+66
I've separated the lint and build jobs into two separate workflows: - Lint: .github/workflows/lint.yaml - Build: .github/workflows/build.yaml The main difference is that the Build workflow will be triggered if the Lint workflow completes while it's been run on the "master" branch. The build job will check if the Lint run was successful and if it were, it actually builds the container, pushes it the GHCR, and triggers the deployment to our kubernetes cluster.
2020-11-16Fix lint errors introduced by persistence removalGravatar Sebastiaan Zeeff-8/+8
We ripped some features out of the bot to make the migration to kubernetes easier. However, that process left us with some linting errors that will play up if anyone makes a PR. I've added "noqa" to the valid TODO lines and commented out lines that introduced now unused names or tried to use now undefined names. This should have no influence on the bot, as it does not touch code that is actually being run at the moment.
2020-11-16Ensure flake8 runs correctly in Pull Request checkGravatar Sebastiaan Zeeff-13/+11
Unfortunately, the flake8 action we were using from the marketplace required us to use the `pull_request_target` event, which runs in the context of the target repository to protect secrets. However, this also meant that flake8 would run on files already merged into our master branch, not the actual changes made in teh PR! That's obviously pretty useless as a guard against merging linting errors into our repository. This change sidesteps the issue by removing the marketplace action and replacing it by a direct `flake8` run command. To make sure error output ends up as a GitHub Actions Annotation, we ask `flake8` to format its error messages using the correct GitHub Workflow Command format: ::error file={filename},line={line},col={col}::{message} Whenever something is printed to stdout/stderr in that format, GitHub Actions will automatically interpret it as the "register error message" workflow command. Since this doesn't require a GitHub Token with "write" permissions, we can now switch back to the safer `pull_request` event that gets a read-only GitHub Token.
2020-11-15Remove DockerHub from GitHub ActionsGravatar Sebastiaan Zeeff-11/+3
We're no longer using DockerHub in our deployment for SeasonalBot, so it does not make sense to keep pushing containers there.
2020-11-15Change CI badge to GitHub ActionsGravatar Sebastiaan Zeeff-1/+1
2020-11-14Merge build and deploy stagesGravatar Joe Banks-19/+2