| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Changes the default value of the advent_of_code_commands constant to be
the same channel ID as sir-lancebot-commands. If no AoC commands channel
is set in the .env file, it'll re-direct people to sir-lancebot-commands
instead.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Please -= 1
|
| |
|
|
| |
Per Mark's comment, re-raising the error isn't necessary.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
I'm a bit ahead of the game and changing the error handler to match
the new style that Iceman will PR shortly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If any of the "spammier" commands (stats, leaderboard) are used within
the primary advent of code channel, rather than a non-specific embed
we instead reply with the channel they should be using.
This also adds a "AOC_WHITELIST_PLUS" constant that makes it easier to
adjust what channels the non-spammier aoc commands can be used in.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commands like `.aoc leaderboard` and `.aoc stats` proved to be spammy
in the main advent of code channel.
An aoc_commands channel has been added for aoc commands
and this update prohibits aoc commands from being used in the primary
aoc channel and adds the comands channel to the whitelist.
This also specifically allows the less spammier commands: join,
subscribe, unsubscribe, and countdown in the primary channel to foster
discussion though.
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Modify error handler check for locally handled errors.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Also, remove error handler for get_command and video_command.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
local error handler no longer checks for BadArgument error and the
attribute handled will be set to True on the error if an OSError occurs.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Error handler now checks if the error has the attribute "handled" for
locally handled errors.
|
| | |
| |
| | |
We need to upload PR artifacts regardless of our lint job failing. As GitHub Actions uses an implicit "success" status function if you don't specify one of your own, we need to include the "always" function in our condition.
|
| | |
| |
| | |
With the new `workflow_run` setup, we need to make sure that we don't try to send an embed for a skipped workflow. This would be noisy and does not add a lot of useful information.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
A workflow run with a `workflow_run` payload does not contain the
necessary information to build a PR embed. As the old method of using
the API to fetch the relevant information turned out to be fragile (read
note 1 below) and the original Lint workflow already contains the
`pull_request` payload, we now store it as a build artifact.
The embed workflow then fetches the artifact and parses it to get the
relevant information out of it.
---
Note 1: Unfortunately, filtering Pull Requests using the "head"
parameter of the ``/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls` endpoint does not work
if the PR belongs to a fork with a different name than the base
repository: the API request will just return an empty array.
I've contacted GH to ask if this was intended or if it's a glitch, but,
for now, it's not a route that's easily available.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I've changed the way we send status embeds to make it work for PRs made
from forks without potentially exposing secrets. Instead of using the
initial workflows to send the embed, I've created a `workflow_run`
workflow that always runs in the context of the base repository.
And added benefit is that we don't have to add the status embed step to
two separate workflows.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Use custom status embeds for workflow runs
|
| | |\ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |/ / / |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This commit introduces enhanced status embeds for workflow runs that
give more information about run that just ended. An added advantage is
that we can disable the default "give me everything"-setting of GitHub
and fine tune when we want to send embeds.
This allows us to only send an embed for the `lint->build` sequence when
the sequence ends (e.g. in the end when done or after an intermediate
step due to failure/cancellation).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Unfortunately, an expired session cookie wreaked havoc to our Advent of
Code commands: All commands that relied on leaderboard data failed
because we couldn't refresh our data and the cache had expired.
To mitigate an expired session, I've added a fallback session feature
that enables us to try again with a different session. While it will
issue an error message to inform us to refresh the expired session
cookie, it does mean that the functionality should continue to work in
the mean time.
The fallback session cookie is currently set to my session cookie, using
an environment variable, `AOC_FALLBACK_SESSION`. It is important that
the user connected to the session is a member of all boards and that
it's a fresh session: We don't want our fallback to expire!
At the same time, while a single fallback session works, the AoC website
also does not like too many requests from a single user. That's why
we'll still use a multi-session model under normal circumstances.
To check for expired sessions, I've added a URL check: The Advent of
Code website will silently redirect people with an expired session,
issuing an 200: OK status as usual. The only way to really check for it
is by comparing the final URL in the response object to the URL we set
out to GET. I've added a custom exception to signal such an unexpected
redirect.
Finally, instead of having the commands just break, I've added an
Exception signal that propagates back to the caller. The solution, with
try-except, is a bit hacky and could benefit from an actual error
handler, but I wanted to get things fixed first; polish can be added
later.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To mitigate problems due to expiring session cookies, I'm currently in
the process of adding support for a fallback cookie. Basically, my
Advent of Code account is a member of *all* leaderboards, which means
that my cookie can be used to fetch all leaderboards as well.
As my session cookie should not expire until after the event, it should
not give us any issues. However, to avoid issues with issuing too many
requests from one session, we should still make sure to set individual
session values regardless of the mitigation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We noticed that some entries on our leaderboard had an incorrect star
count attached to their name.
After a bit of digging, @HassanAbouelela discovered that this was caused
by the use of the member's name as the key for the leaderboard
dictionary: If different accounts used the same display name for the
leaderboard, they'd be combined into one glitched score dict.
The fix @HassanAbouelela wrote is to use the member id instead of the
name as the key for the leaderboard. I've changed a few names here and
there, but nothing major.
This commit closes #536
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The daily stats function contained a bug that prevented it from working
correctly. The reason was that I was looking for `int` keys where the
actual keys were strings. I now make sure to create a `str` from the
`int` I get back from `range`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I've added support for ignoring scores from specific days. A list of
days to ignore can be provided using the environment variable
`AOC_IGNORED_DAYS` as a comma-separated list.
This example would ignore day 1 and day 23:
AOC_IGNORED_DAYS=1,23
I've also added a helper function to sort the leaderboard not only on
the achieved score, but also on the number of stars an individual has
completed.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Note: This won't start the countdown functions yet, they still rely on
the cog being loaded in december.
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Advent of Code 2020
|
| | |\
| |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
python-discord/sebastiaan/ci/add-core-dev-approval-check
Add check for core dev approvals on pull requests
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This commit adds a workflow that checks if a pull request has received
at least one approval from a core developer. If not, the check will fail
and block us from merging the Pull Request.
The reason we're adding this check is because we're moving away from
making the Core Developers team "code owner" of every line in every
repository. This created a lot of "notification" spam, which drowned out
the actually relevant notifications.
This will accomplish the same, at least one core dev needs to approve,
but without the notification spam.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I've moved the helper functions to the _helpers.py module and clarified
the docstring of the `is_in_advent` helper function.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
There were still two constants left over that were no longer used after
the rewrite. I've removed them.
|
| | | |\
| |_|/
|/| | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I've updated the information for the about embed:
- Added information on the scoring of private leaderboards
- Changed the text of "join our private leaderboard", as we no longer
have to introduce private leaderboards there.
- I've also streamlined the section on Auth providers.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I accidentally removed the global leaderboard command. I've added it
back!
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We're no longer going to use a two-channel setup for this event, as we
don't want to split the event community into two, staff and non-staff.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This helper function was only being used in one spot and did not factor
out any logic. I've removed the helper function to just create the embed
where it's needed.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I've rewritten the Advent of Code leaderboard logic. Unfortunately,
nearly all of the changes made are interrelated, meaning that they've
ended up in the same commit.
To add a bit of structure to the extension, I've chosen for a subpackage
structure instead of a single file structure.
The biggest changes:
- Whether or not you get a join code for the staff leaderboard will now
be determined by looking for the Helpers-role.
- The Python Discord Leaderboard now includes all boards, including the
staff leaderboard. This is one event.
- Redis is now used to set a cache expiry period. This means that our
code does not have to check for cache staleness; Redis will do that
for us.
- The period "fetching" task has been removed. We now fetch solely when
the data is needed to prevent putting unnecessary stress on the Advent
of Code website.
- The option to display the Global Leaderboard within Discord has been
removed. Rather, we now link to the website. This simplified the code
for now, although we could add it back later.
- An additional command, `.aoc refresh`, has been added to allow Admins
and the Events Lead to force the cache to be invalidated. This should
be done sparingly to not overburden the AoC website.
- I've also made sure that the daily notification task actually pings
the notification role by setting the `allowed_mentions` kwarg.
|