| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
| ... | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This is an important piece of information that shall be relayed.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decision was made to use embeds to archive incidents instead of
webhooking the raw message. As such, we're reverting the branch
to a state from which the adjustments will be easier to make.
Reverted commits:
* a8d179d9b04f54b20c5e870bcfa85c78c42c8dca
* 6fa8caed037b247a7c194f58a4635de7dae21fd2
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Incident author and the moderator who actioned report are now passed
through `make_username` to create the webhook username.
Tests adjusted as appropriate.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The justification is to incorporate the `actioned_by` name into the
username in some way, and so the logical thing to do is to abstract
this process into a helper so that it can easily be adjusted in the
future. For now, I've chosen to separate the names by a pipe.
Discord webhook username cannot exceed 80 characters in length, and
so we cap it at this length by default. This is seen as more of an
edge-case, but it should be accounted for, as we're not joining two
names. The `max_length` param is configurable primarily for testing
purposes, it probably should never be passed explicitly.
This commit also provides two tests for the function.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See: a8b4e394d9da57287cd9497cd9bb0a97fa467e84
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With PR #1009 merged, we now apply the same fix to our relay function.
This prevents the "clyde" word from sneaking into the webhook username,
which is forbidden and will return a 400.
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adds the `sub_clyde` function, which we'll apply to our webhook.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This is already being patched at class-level.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Suggested by Mark during review. This follows the "ask for forgiveness
rather than permission" paradigm, ends up being less code to read, and
may be seen as more logical / safer.
The `ALLOWED_EMOJI` set was renamed to `ALL_SIGNALS` as this now better
communicates the set's purpose.
Tests adjusted as appropriate.
Co-authored-by: MarkKoz <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Using `issubset` is a much simpler & more readable way of expressing
the relationship between the two sets.
Suggested by Mark during review.
Co-authored-by: MarkKoz <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Requested during review.
Co-authored-by: ks129 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Banks <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Suggested by Mark during review.
Co-authored-by: MarkKoz <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pointed out by Mark during review that this is unnecessary, as logging
using `exception` automatically appends the `exc_info` of the handled
exception when done in an except block.
Co-authored-by: MarkKoz <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This is way too spacious for how little is happening here.
Suggested by ks129.
Co-authored-by: ks129 <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Caught during review by ks129.
Co-authored-by: ks129 <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This was originally in place to silence a PyCharm warning regarding
accessing the private attributes.
However, since there is no corresponding error code to specify,
the noqa will silence any linter warning, which is potentially
dangerous, and seems to be bad practice.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Logs useful when observing the internals but too verbose for DEBUG are
reduced to TRACE.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See the docstring. This does not make the ambition to be powerful
enough to be included in `tests.helpers`, and is only intended
for local purposes.
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This also breaks the helpers import statement into a vertical list,
as the amount of imports has grown too much. I still believe that
this is a preferred alternative to accessing the helpers via module
namespace, as we use them a lot, and the added visual noise would
be annoying to read - their names are already descriptive enough.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We do not wish to log 404 exceptions as those are expected, however,
if something else goes wrong, we shouldn't silence it.
This also removes the explicit None return as it only adds syntax
noise.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This will be useful for others tests as well.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For cleanliness, I've decided to make a separate class for each method.
Since most tests will want to have an `Incident` instance ready, they
can inherit the `setUp` from `TestIncidents`, which does not make any
assertions on its own.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Let's make it clear that this is our own mock. We also move the
definition to the top of the module.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No reason to build own MagicMocks as we already have helpers that
more accurately mimic the mocked behaviour.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This adds a proper class docstring & small touch-ups to local
comments where necessary.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This contains the main logic for handling reactions and glues all the
helpers together.
Unfortunately, gracefully handling everything that can go wrong in
the process requires quite a lot of code ~ but, at least to me, it
seems like this all should now be fairly safe.
The idea to await the message delete event before releasing the lock
was conceived by Ves, while Mark helped me refine it.
Co-authored-by: Sebastiaan Zeeff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: MarkKoz <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See docstring!
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See docstring. The exception log is DEBUG level as failure does not
necessarily indicate that we have done something wrong. We rely on
the API to tell us that the message no longer exists in situations
where we have 2 coroutines racing to archive the same message.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The crawler now avoids making API calls for messages which:
* Are not incidents
* Already have all signals
As a result, we can sleep only after making actual calls. This speeds
up the task completion considerable, while also making it lighter
on the API. Victory!
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Looks like we'll need quite a few helpers, and I think it's cleaner
to keep them at module level.
It helps avoid the question of: what do I do if a staticmethod
depends on another staticmethod?
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The code is now basically self-documenting, the docstring is no
longer necessary.
The ultimate goal is to allow `crawl_incidents` to be more smart
about which messages need to be passed to `add_signals`, so that
it doesn't need to sleep after each message.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|