diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
38 files changed, 2947 insertions, 1386 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_base.py b/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_base.py deleted file mode 100644 index 6ee9dfda6..000000000 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_base.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,403 +0,0 @@ -import unittest -from unittest import mock - -import discord - -from bot import constants -from bot.api import ResponseCodeError -from bot.cogs.sync.syncers import Syncer, _Diff -from tests import helpers - - -class TestSyncer(Syncer): - """Syncer subclass with mocks for abstract methods for testing purposes.""" - - name = "test" - _get_diff = mock.AsyncMock() - _sync = mock.AsyncMock() - - -class SyncerBaseTests(unittest.TestCase): - """Tests for the syncer base class.""" - - def setUp(self): - self.bot = helpers.MockBot() - - def test_instantiation_fails_without_abstract_methods(self): - """The class must have abstract methods implemented.""" - with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, "Can't instantiate abstract class"): - Syncer(self.bot) - - -class SyncerSendPromptTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): - """Tests for sending the sync confirmation prompt.""" - - def setUp(self): - self.bot = helpers.MockBot() - self.syncer = TestSyncer(self.bot) - - def mock_get_channel(self): - """Fixture to return a mock channel and message for when `get_channel` is used.""" - self.bot.reset_mock() - - mock_channel = helpers.MockTextChannel() - mock_message = helpers.MockMessage() - - mock_channel.send.return_value = mock_message - self.bot.get_channel.return_value = mock_channel - - return mock_channel, mock_message - - def mock_fetch_channel(self): - """Fixture to return a mock channel and message for when `fetch_channel` is used.""" - self.bot.reset_mock() - - mock_channel = helpers.MockTextChannel() - mock_message = helpers.MockMessage() - - self.bot.get_channel.return_value = None - mock_channel.send.return_value = mock_message - self.bot.fetch_channel.return_value = mock_channel - - return mock_channel, mock_message - - async def test_send_prompt_edits_and_returns_message(self): - """The given message should be edited to display the prompt and then should be returned.""" - msg = helpers.MockMessage() - ret_val = await self.syncer._send_prompt(msg) - - msg.edit.assert_called_once() - self.assertIn("content", msg.edit.call_args[1]) - self.assertEqual(ret_val, msg) - - async def test_send_prompt_gets_dev_core_channel(self): - """The dev-core channel should be retrieved if an extant message isn't given.""" - subtests = ( - (self.bot.get_channel, self.mock_get_channel), - (self.bot.fetch_channel, self.mock_fetch_channel), - ) - - for method, mock_ in subtests: - with self.subTest(method=method, msg=mock_.__name__): - mock_() - await self.syncer._send_prompt() - - method.assert_called_once_with(constants.Channels.dev_core) - - async def test_send_prompt_returns_none_if_channel_fetch_fails(self): - """None should be returned if there's an HTTPException when fetching the channel.""" - self.bot.get_channel.return_value = None - self.bot.fetch_channel.side_effect = discord.HTTPException(mock.MagicMock(), "test error!") - - ret_val = await self.syncer._send_prompt() - - self.assertIsNone(ret_val) - - async def test_send_prompt_sends_and_returns_new_message_if_not_given(self): - """A new message mentioning core devs should be sent and returned if message isn't given.""" - for mock_ in (self.mock_get_channel, self.mock_fetch_channel): - with self.subTest(msg=mock_.__name__): - mock_channel, mock_message = mock_() - ret_val = await self.syncer._send_prompt() - - mock_channel.send.assert_called_once() - self.assertIn(self.syncer._CORE_DEV_MENTION, mock_channel.send.call_args[0][0]) - self.assertEqual(ret_val, mock_message) - - async def test_send_prompt_adds_reactions(self): - """The message should have reactions for confirmation added.""" - extant_message = helpers.MockMessage() - subtests = ( - (extant_message, lambda: (None, extant_message)), - (None, self.mock_get_channel), - (None, self.mock_fetch_channel), - ) - - for message_arg, mock_ in subtests: - subtest_msg = "Extant message" if mock_.__name__ == "<lambda>" else mock_.__name__ - - with self.subTest(msg=subtest_msg): - _, mock_message = mock_() - await self.syncer._send_prompt(message_arg) - - calls = [mock.call(emoji) for emoji in self.syncer._REACTION_EMOJIS] - mock_message.add_reaction.assert_has_calls(calls) - - -class SyncerConfirmationTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): - """Tests for waiting for a sync confirmation reaction on the prompt.""" - - def setUp(self): - self.bot = helpers.MockBot() - self.syncer = TestSyncer(self.bot) - self.core_dev_role = helpers.MockRole(id=constants.Roles.core_developers) - - @staticmethod - def get_message_reaction(emoji): - """Fixture to return a mock message an reaction from the given `emoji`.""" - message = helpers.MockMessage() - reaction = helpers.MockReaction(emoji=emoji, message=message) - - return message, reaction - - def test_reaction_check_for_valid_emoji_and_authors(self): - """Should return True if authors are identical or are a bot and a core dev, respectively.""" - user_subtests = ( - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - "identical users", - ), - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77, bot=True), - helpers.MockMember(id=43, roles=[self.core_dev_role]), - "bot author and core-dev reactor", - ), - ) - - for emoji in self.syncer._REACTION_EMOJIS: - for author, user, msg in user_subtests: - with self.subTest(author=author, user=user, emoji=emoji, msg=msg): - message, reaction = self.get_message_reaction(emoji) - ret_val = self.syncer._reaction_check(author, message, reaction, user) - - self.assertTrue(ret_val) - - def test_reaction_check_for_invalid_reactions(self): - """Should return False for invalid reaction events.""" - valid_emoji = self.syncer._REACTION_EMOJIS[0] - subtests = ( - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - *self.get_message_reaction(valid_emoji), - helpers.MockMember(id=43, roles=[self.core_dev_role]), - "users are not identical", - ), - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77, bot=True), - *self.get_message_reaction(valid_emoji), - helpers.MockMember(id=43), - "reactor lacks the core-dev role", - ), - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77, bot=True, roles=[self.core_dev_role]), - *self.get_message_reaction(valid_emoji), - helpers.MockMember(id=77, bot=True, roles=[self.core_dev_role]), - "reactor is a bot", - ), - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - helpers.MockMessage(id=95), - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=valid_emoji, message=helpers.MockMessage(id=26)), - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - "messages are not identical", - ), - ( - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - *self.get_message_reaction("InVaLiD"), - helpers.MockMember(id=77), - "emoji is invalid", - ), - ) - - for *args, msg in subtests: - kwargs = dict(zip(("author", "message", "reaction", "user"), args)) - with self.subTest(**kwargs, msg=msg): - ret_val = self.syncer._reaction_check(*args) - self.assertFalse(ret_val) - - async def test_wait_for_confirmation(self): - """The message should always be edited and only return True if the emoji is a check mark.""" - subtests = ( - (constants.Emojis.check_mark, True, None), - ("InVaLiD", False, None), - (None, False, TimeoutError), - ) - - for emoji, ret_val, side_effect in subtests: - for bot in (True, False): - with self.subTest(emoji=emoji, ret_val=ret_val, side_effect=side_effect, bot=bot): - # Set up mocks - message = helpers.MockMessage() - member = helpers.MockMember(bot=bot) - - self.bot.wait_for.reset_mock() - self.bot.wait_for.return_value = (helpers.MockReaction(emoji=emoji), None) - self.bot.wait_for.side_effect = side_effect - - # Call the function - actual_return = await self.syncer._wait_for_confirmation(member, message) - - # Perform assertions - self.bot.wait_for.assert_called_once() - self.assertIn("reaction_add", self.bot.wait_for.call_args[0]) - - message.edit.assert_called_once() - kwargs = message.edit.call_args[1] - self.assertIn("content", kwargs) - - # Core devs should only be mentioned if the author is a bot. - if bot: - self.assertIn(self.syncer._CORE_DEV_MENTION, kwargs["content"]) - else: - self.assertNotIn(self.syncer._CORE_DEV_MENTION, kwargs["content"]) - - self.assertIs(actual_return, ret_val) - - -class SyncerSyncTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): - """Tests for main function orchestrating the sync.""" - - def setUp(self): - self.bot = helpers.MockBot(user=helpers.MockMember(bot=True)) - self.syncer = TestSyncer(self.bot) - - async def test_sync_respects_confirmation_result(self): - """The sync should abort if confirmation fails and continue if confirmed.""" - mock_message = helpers.MockMessage() - subtests = ( - (True, mock_message), - (False, None), - ) - - for confirmed, message in subtests: - with self.subTest(confirmed=confirmed): - self.syncer._sync.reset_mock() - self.syncer._get_diff.reset_mock() - - diff = _Diff({1, 2, 3}, {4, 5}, None) - self.syncer._get_diff.return_value = diff - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result = mock.AsyncMock( - return_value=(confirmed, message) - ) - - guild = helpers.MockGuild() - await self.syncer.sync(guild) - - self.syncer._get_diff.assert_called_once_with(guild) - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result.assert_called_once() - - if confirmed: - self.syncer._sync.assert_called_once_with(diff) - else: - self.syncer._sync.assert_not_called() - - async def test_sync_diff_size(self): - """The diff size should be correctly calculated.""" - subtests = ( - (6, _Diff({1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6})), - (5, _Diff({1, 2, 3}, None, {4, 5})), - (0, _Diff(None, None, None)), - (0, _Diff(set(), set(), set())), - ) - - for size, diff in subtests: - with self.subTest(size=size, diff=diff): - self.syncer._get_diff.reset_mock() - self.syncer._get_diff.return_value = diff - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result = mock.AsyncMock(return_value=(False, None)) - - guild = helpers.MockGuild() - await self.syncer.sync(guild) - - self.syncer._get_diff.assert_called_once_with(guild) - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result.assert_called_once() - self.assertEqual(self.syncer._get_confirmation_result.call_args[0][0], size) - - async def test_sync_message_edited(self): - """The message should be edited if one was sent, even if the sync has an API error.""" - subtests = ( - (None, None, False), - (helpers.MockMessage(), None, True), - (helpers.MockMessage(), ResponseCodeError(mock.MagicMock()), True), - ) - - for message, side_effect, should_edit in subtests: - with self.subTest(message=message, side_effect=side_effect, should_edit=should_edit): - self.syncer._sync.side_effect = side_effect - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result = mock.AsyncMock( - return_value=(True, message) - ) - - guild = helpers.MockGuild() - await self.syncer.sync(guild) - - if should_edit: - message.edit.assert_called_once() - self.assertIn("content", message.edit.call_args[1]) - - async def test_sync_confirmation_context_redirect(self): - """If ctx is given, a new message should be sent and author should be ctx's author.""" - mock_member = helpers.MockMember() - subtests = ( - (None, self.bot.user, None), - (helpers.MockContext(author=mock_member), mock_member, helpers.MockMessage()), - ) - - for ctx, author, message in subtests: - with self.subTest(ctx=ctx, author=author, message=message): - if ctx is not None: - ctx.send.return_value = message - - # Make sure `_get_diff` returns a MagicMock, not an AsyncMock - self.syncer._get_diff.return_value = mock.MagicMock() - - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result = mock.AsyncMock(return_value=(False, None)) - - guild = helpers.MockGuild() - await self.syncer.sync(guild, ctx) - - if ctx is not None: - ctx.send.assert_called_once() - - self.syncer._get_confirmation_result.assert_called_once() - self.assertEqual(self.syncer._get_confirmation_result.call_args[0][1], author) - self.assertEqual(self.syncer._get_confirmation_result.call_args[0][2], message) - - @mock.patch.object(constants.Sync, "max_diff", new=3) - async def test_confirmation_result_small_diff(self): - """Should always return True and the given message if the diff size is too small.""" - author = helpers.MockMember() - expected_message = helpers.MockMessage() - - for size in (3, 2): # pragma: no cover - with self.subTest(size=size): - self.syncer._send_prompt = mock.AsyncMock() - self.syncer._wait_for_confirmation = mock.AsyncMock() - - coro = self.syncer._get_confirmation_result(size, author, expected_message) - result, actual_message = await coro - - self.assertTrue(result) - self.assertEqual(actual_message, expected_message) - self.syncer._send_prompt.assert_not_called() - self.syncer._wait_for_confirmation.assert_not_called() - - @mock.patch.object(constants.Sync, "max_diff", new=3) - async def test_confirmation_result_large_diff(self): - """Should return True if confirmed and False if _send_prompt fails or aborted.""" - author = helpers.MockMember() - mock_message = helpers.MockMessage() - - subtests = ( - (True, mock_message, True, "confirmed"), - (False, None, False, "_send_prompt failed"), - (False, mock_message, False, "aborted"), - ) - - for expected_result, expected_message, confirmed, msg in subtests: # pragma: no cover - with self.subTest(msg=msg): - self.syncer._send_prompt = mock.AsyncMock(return_value=expected_message) - self.syncer._wait_for_confirmation = mock.AsyncMock(return_value=confirmed) - - coro = self.syncer._get_confirmation_result(4, author) - actual_result, actual_message = await coro - - self.syncer._send_prompt.assert_called_once_with(None) # message defaults to None - self.assertIs(actual_result, expected_result) - self.assertEqual(actual_message, expected_message) - - if expected_message: - self.syncer._wait_for_confirmation.assert_called_once_with( - author, expected_message - ) diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_duck_pond.py b/tests/bot/cogs/test_duck_pond.py deleted file mode 100644 index 7e6bfc748..000000000 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_duck_pond.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,575 +0,0 @@ -import asyncio -import logging -import typing -import unittest -from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch - -import discord - -from bot import constants -from bot.cogs import duck_pond -from tests import base -from tests import helpers - -MODULE_PATH = "bot.cogs.duck_pond" - - -class DuckPondTests(base.LoggingTestsMixin, unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): - """Tests for DuckPond functionality.""" - - @classmethod - def setUpClass(cls): - """Sets up the objects that only have to be initialized once.""" - cls.nonstaff_member = helpers.MockMember(name="Non-staffer") - - cls.staff_role = helpers.MockRole(name="Staff role", id=constants.STAFF_ROLES[0]) - cls.staff_member = helpers.MockMember(name="staffer", roles=[cls.staff_role]) - - cls.checkmark_emoji = "\N{White Heavy Check Mark}" - cls.thumbs_up_emoji = "\N{Thumbs Up Sign}" - cls.unicode_duck_emoji = "\N{Duck}" - cls.duck_pond_emoji = helpers.MockPartialEmoji(id=constants.DuckPond.custom_emojis[0]) - cls.non_duck_custom_emoji = helpers.MockPartialEmoji(id=123) - - def setUp(self): - """Sets up the objects that need to be refreshed before each test.""" - self.bot = helpers.MockBot(user=helpers.MockMember(id=46692)) - self.cog = duck_pond.DuckPond(bot=self.bot) - - def test_duck_pond_correctly_initializes(self): - """`__init__ should set `bot` and `webhook_id` attributes and schedule `fetch_webhook`.""" - bot = helpers.MockBot() - cog = MagicMock() - - duck_pond.DuckPond.__init__(cog, bot) - - self.assertEqual(cog.bot, bot) - self.assertEqual(cog.webhook_id, constants.Webhooks.duck_pond) - bot.loop.create_loop.called_once_with(cog.fetch_webhook()) - - def test_fetch_webhook_succeeds_without_connectivity_issues(self): - """The `fetch_webhook` method waits until `READY` event and sets the `webhook` attribute.""" - self.bot.fetch_webhook.return_value = "dummy webhook" - self.cog.webhook_id = 1 - - asyncio.run(self.cog.fetch_webhook()) - - self.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_called_once() - self.bot.fetch_webhook.assert_called_once_with(1) - self.assertEqual(self.cog.webhook, "dummy webhook") - - def test_fetch_webhook_logs_when_unable_to_fetch_webhook(self): - """The `fetch_webhook` method should log an exception when it fails to fetch the webhook.""" - self.bot.fetch_webhook.side_effect = discord.HTTPException(response=MagicMock(), message="Not found.") - self.cog.webhook_id = 1 - - log = logging.getLogger('bot.cogs.duck_pond') - with self.assertLogs(logger=log, level=logging.ERROR) as log_watcher: - asyncio.run(self.cog.fetch_webhook()) - - self.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_called_once() - self.bot.fetch_webhook.assert_called_once_with(1) - - self.assertEqual(len(log_watcher.records), 1) - - record = log_watcher.records[0] - self.assertEqual(record.levelno, logging.ERROR) - - def test_is_staff_returns_correct_values_based_on_instance_passed(self): - """The `is_staff` method should return correct values based on the instance passed.""" - test_cases = ( - (helpers.MockUser(name="User instance"), False), - (helpers.MockMember(name="Member instance without staff role"), False), - (helpers.MockMember(name="Member instance with staff role", roles=[self.staff_role]), True) - ) - - for user, expected_return in test_cases: - actual_return = self.cog.is_staff(user) - with self.subTest(user_type=user.name, expected_return=expected_return, actual_return=actual_return): - self.assertEqual(expected_return, actual_return) - - async def test_has_green_checkmark_correctly_detects_presence_of_green_checkmark_emoji(self): - """The `has_green_checkmark` method should only return `True` if one is present.""" - test_cases = ( - ( - "No reactions", helpers.MockMessage(), False - ), - ( - "No green check mark reactions", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[ - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, users=[self.bot.user]), - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.thumbs_up_emoji, users=[self.bot.user]) - ]), - False - ), - ( - "Green check mark reaction, but not from our bot", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[ - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, users=[self.bot.user]), - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.checkmark_emoji, users=[self.staff_member]) - ]), - False - ), - ( - "Green check mark reaction, with one from the bot", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[ - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, users=[self.bot.user]), - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.checkmark_emoji, users=[self.staff_member, self.bot.user]) - ]), - True - ) - ) - - for description, message, expected_return in test_cases: - actual_return = await self.cog.has_green_checkmark(message) - with self.subTest( - test_case=description, - expected_return=expected_return, - actual_return=actual_return - ): - self.assertEqual(expected_return, actual_return) - - def test_send_webhook_correctly_passes_on_arguments(self): - """The `send_webhook` method should pass the arguments to the webhook correctly.""" - self.cog.webhook = helpers.MockAsyncWebhook() - - content = "fake content" - username = "fake username" - avatar_url = "fake avatar_url" - embed = "fake embed" - - asyncio.run(self.cog.send_webhook(content, username, avatar_url, embed)) - - self.cog.webhook.send.assert_called_once_with( - content=content, - username=username, - avatar_url=avatar_url, - embed=embed - ) - - def test_send_webhook_logs_when_sending_message_fails(self): - """The `send_webhook` method should catch a `discord.HTTPException` and log accordingly.""" - self.cog.webhook = helpers.MockAsyncWebhook() - self.cog.webhook.send.side_effect = discord.HTTPException(response=MagicMock(), message="Something failed.") - - log = logging.getLogger('bot.cogs.duck_pond') - with self.assertLogs(logger=log, level=logging.ERROR) as log_watcher: - asyncio.run(self.cog.send_webhook()) - - self.assertEqual(len(log_watcher.records), 1) - - record = log_watcher.records[0] - self.assertEqual(record.levelno, logging.ERROR) - - def _get_reaction( - self, - emoji: typing.Union[str, helpers.MockEmoji], - staff: int = 0, - nonstaff: int = 0 - ) -> helpers.MockReaction: - staffers = [helpers.MockMember(roles=[self.staff_role]) for _ in range(staff)] - nonstaffers = [helpers.MockMember() for _ in range(nonstaff)] - return helpers.MockReaction(emoji=emoji, users=staffers + nonstaffers) - - async def test_count_ducks_correctly_counts_the_number_of_eligible_duck_emojis(self): - """The `count_ducks` method should return the number of unique staffers who gave a duck.""" - test_cases = ( - # Simple test cases - # A message without reactions should return 0 - ( - "No reactions", - helpers.MockMessage(), - 0 - ), - # A message with a non-duck reaction from a non-staffer should return 0 - ( - "Non-duck reaction from non-staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.thumbs_up_emoji, nonstaff=1)]), - 0 - ), - # A message with a non-duck reaction from a staffer should return 0 - ( - "Non-duck reaction from staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.non_duck_custom_emoji, staff=1)]), - 0 - ), - # A message with a non-duck reaction from a non-staffer and staffer should return 0 - ( - "Non-duck reaction from staffer + non-staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.thumbs_up_emoji, staff=1, nonstaff=1)]), - 0 - ), - # A message with a unicode duck reaction from a non-staffer should return 0 - ( - "Unicode Duck Reaction from non-staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, nonstaff=1)]), - 0 - ), - # A message with a unicode duck reaction from a staffer should return 1 - ( - "Unicode Duck Reaction from staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, staff=1)]), - 1 - ), - # A message with a unicode duck reaction from a non-staffer and staffer should return 1 - ( - "Unicode Duck Reaction from staffer + non-staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, staff=1, nonstaff=1)]), - 1 - ), - # A message with a duckpond duck reaction from a non-staffer should return 0 - ( - "Duckpond Duck Reaction from non-staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.duck_pond_emoji, nonstaff=1)]), - 0 - ), - # A message with a duckpond duck reaction from a staffer should return 1 - ( - "Duckpond Duck Reaction from staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.duck_pond_emoji, staff=1)]), - 1 - ), - # A message with a duckpond duck reaction from a non-staffer and staffer should return 1 - ( - "Duckpond Duck Reaction from staffer + non-staffer", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.duck_pond_emoji, staff=1, nonstaff=1)]), - 1 - ), - - # Complex test cases - # A message with duckpond duck reactions from 3 staffers and 2 non-staffers returns 3 - ( - "Duckpond Duck Reaction from 3 staffers + 2 non-staffers", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=self.duck_pond_emoji, staff=3, nonstaff=2)]), - 3 - ), - # A staffer with multiple duck reactions only counts once - ( - "Two different duck reactions from the same staffer", - helpers.MockMessage( - reactions=[ - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.duck_pond_emoji, users=[self.staff_member]), - helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, users=[self.staff_member]), - ] - ), - 1 - ), - # A non-string emoji does not count (to test the `isinstance(reaction.emoji, str)` elif) - ( - "Reaction with non-Emoji/str emoij from 3 staffers + 2 non-staffers", - helpers.MockMessage(reactions=[self._get_reaction(emoji=100, staff=3, nonstaff=2)]), - 0 - ), - # We correctly sum when multiple reactions are provided. - ( - "Duckpond Duck Reaction from 3 staffers + 2 non-staffers", - helpers.MockMessage( - reactions=[ - self._get_reaction(emoji=self.duck_pond_emoji, staff=3, nonstaff=2), - self._get_reaction(emoji=self.unicode_duck_emoji, staff=4, nonstaff=9), - ] - ), - 3 + 4 - ), - ) - - for description, message, expected_count in test_cases: - actual_count = await self.cog.count_ducks(message) - with self.subTest(test_case=description, expected_count=expected_count, actual_count=actual_count): - self.assertEqual(expected_count, actual_count) - - async def test_relay_message_correctly_relays_content_and_attachments(self): - """The `relay_message` method should correctly relay message content and attachments.""" - send_webhook_path = f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.send_webhook" - send_attachments_path = f"{MODULE_PATH}.send_attachments" - - self.cog.webhook = helpers.MockAsyncWebhook() - - test_values = ( - (helpers.MockMessage(clean_content="", attachments=[]), False, False), - (helpers.MockMessage(clean_content="message", attachments=[]), True, False), - (helpers.MockMessage(clean_content="", attachments=["attachment"]), False, True), - (helpers.MockMessage(clean_content="message", attachments=["attachment"]), True, True), - ) - - for message, expect_webhook_call, expect_attachment_call in test_values: - with patch(send_webhook_path, new_callable=AsyncMock) as send_webhook: - with patch(send_attachments_path, new_callable=AsyncMock) as send_attachments: - with self.subTest(clean_content=message.clean_content, attachments=message.attachments): - await self.cog.relay_message(message) - - self.assertEqual(expect_webhook_call, send_webhook.called) - self.assertEqual(expect_attachment_call, send_attachments.called) - - message.add_reaction.assert_called_once_with(self.checkmark_emoji) - - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.send_attachments", new_callable=AsyncMock) - async def test_relay_message_handles_irretrievable_attachment_exceptions(self, send_attachments): - """The `relay_message` method should handle irretrievable attachments.""" - message = helpers.MockMessage(clean_content="message", attachments=["attachment"]) - side_effects = (discord.errors.Forbidden(MagicMock(), ""), discord.errors.NotFound(MagicMock(), "")) - - self.cog.webhook = helpers.MockAsyncWebhook() - log = logging.getLogger("bot.cogs.duck_pond") - - for side_effect in side_effects: # pragma: no cover - send_attachments.side_effect = side_effect - with patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.send_webhook", new_callable=AsyncMock) as send_webhook: - with self.subTest(side_effect=type(side_effect).__name__): - with self.assertNotLogs(logger=log, level=logging.ERROR): - await self.cog.relay_message(message) - - self.assertEqual(send_webhook.call_count, 2) - - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.send_webhook", new_callable=AsyncMock) - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.send_attachments", new_callable=AsyncMock) - async def test_relay_message_handles_attachment_http_error(self, send_attachments, send_webhook): - """The `relay_message` method should handle irretrievable attachments.""" - message = helpers.MockMessage(clean_content="message", attachments=["attachment"]) - - self.cog.webhook = helpers.MockAsyncWebhook() - log = logging.getLogger("bot.cogs.duck_pond") - - side_effect = discord.HTTPException(MagicMock(), "") - send_attachments.side_effect = side_effect - with self.subTest(side_effect=type(side_effect).__name__): - with self.assertLogs(logger=log, level=logging.ERROR) as log_watcher: - await self.cog.relay_message(message) - - send_webhook.assert_called_once_with( - content=message.clean_content, - username=message.author.display_name, - avatar_url=message.author.avatar_url - ) - - self.assertEqual(len(log_watcher.records), 1) - - record = log_watcher.records[0] - self.assertEqual(record.levelno, logging.ERROR) - - def _mock_payload(self, label: str, is_custom_emoji: bool, id_: int, emoji_name: str): - """Creates a mock `on_raw_reaction_add` payload with the specified emoji data.""" - payload = MagicMock(name=label) - payload.emoji.is_custom_emoji.return_value = is_custom_emoji - payload.emoji.id = id_ - payload.emoji.name = emoji_name - return payload - - async def test_payload_has_duckpond_emoji_correctly_detects_relevant_emojis(self): - """The `on_raw_reaction_add` event handler should ignore irrelevant emojis.""" - test_values = ( - # Custom Emojis - ( - self._mock_payload( - label="Custom Duckpond Emoji", - is_custom_emoji=True, - id_=constants.DuckPond.custom_emojis[0], - emoji_name="" - ), - True - ), - ( - self._mock_payload( - label="Custom Non-Duckpond Emoji", - is_custom_emoji=True, - id_=123, - emoji_name="" - ), - False - ), - # Unicode Emojis - ( - self._mock_payload( - label="Unicode Duck Emoji", - is_custom_emoji=False, - id_=1, - emoji_name=self.unicode_duck_emoji - ), - True - ), - ( - self._mock_payload( - label="Unicode Non-Duck Emoji", - is_custom_emoji=False, - id_=1, - emoji_name=self.thumbs_up_emoji - ), - False - ), - ) - - for payload, expected_return in test_values: - actual_return = self.cog._payload_has_duckpond_emoji(payload) - with self.subTest(case=payload._mock_name, expected_return=expected_return, actual_return=actual_return): - self.assertEqual(expected_return, actual_return) - - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.discord.utils.get") - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond._payload_has_duckpond_emoji", new=MagicMock(return_value=False)) - def test_on_raw_reaction_add_returns_early_with_payload_without_duck_emoji(self, utils_get): - """The `on_raw_reaction_add` method should return early if the payload does not contain a duck emoji.""" - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(self.cog.on_raw_reaction_add(payload=MagicMock()))) - - # Ensure we've returned before making an unnecessary API call in the lines of code after the emoji check - utils_get.assert_not_called() - - def _raw_reaction_mocks(self, channel_id, message_id, user_id): - """Sets up mocks for tests of the `on_raw_reaction_add` event listener.""" - channel = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=channel_id) - self.bot.get_all_channels.return_value = (channel,) - - message = helpers.MockMessage(id=message_id) - - channel.fetch_message.return_value = message - - member = helpers.MockMember(id=user_id, roles=[self.staff_role]) - message.guild.members = (member,) - - payload = MagicMock(channel_id=channel_id, message_id=message_id, user_id=user_id) - - return channel, message, member, payload - - async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_returns_for_bot_and_non_staff_members(self): - """The `on_raw_reaction_add` event handler should return for bot users or non-staff members.""" - channel_id = 1234 - message_id = 2345 - user_id = 3456 - - channel, message, _, payload = self._raw_reaction_mocks(channel_id, message_id, user_id) - - test_cases = ( - ("non-staff member", helpers.MockMember(id=user_id)), - ("bot staff member", helpers.MockMember(id=user_id, roles=[self.staff_role], bot=True)), - ) - - payload.emoji = self.duck_pond_emoji - - for description, member in test_cases: - message.guild.members = (member, ) - with self.subTest(test_case=description), patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.has_green_checkmark") as checkmark: - checkmark.side_effect = AssertionError( - "Expected method to return before calling `self.has_green_checkmark`." - ) - self.assertIsNone(await self.cog.on_raw_reaction_add(payload)) - - # Check that we did make it past the payload checks - channel.fetch_message.assert_called_once() - channel.fetch_message.reset_mock() - - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.is_staff") - @patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.count_ducks", new_callable=AsyncMock) - def test_on_raw_reaction_add_returns_on_message_with_green_checkmark_placed_by_bot(self, count_ducks, is_staff): - """The `on_raw_reaction_add` event should return when the message has a green check mark placed by the bot.""" - channel_id = 31415926535 - message_id = 27182818284 - user_id = 16180339887 - - channel, message, member, payload = self._raw_reaction_mocks(channel_id, message_id, user_id) - - payload.emoji = helpers.MockPartialEmoji(name=self.unicode_duck_emoji) - payload.emoji.is_custom_emoji.return_value = False - - message.reactions = [helpers.MockReaction(emoji=self.checkmark_emoji, users=[self.bot.user])] - - is_staff.return_value = True - count_ducks.side_effect = AssertionError("Expected method to return before calling `self.count_ducks`") - - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(self.cog.on_raw_reaction_add(payload))) - - # Assert that we've made it past `self.is_staff` - is_staff.assert_called_once() - - async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_does_not_relay_below_duck_threshold(self): - """The `on_raw_reaction_add` listener should not relay messages or attachments below the duck threshold.""" - test_cases = ( - (constants.DuckPond.threshold - 1, False), - (constants.DuckPond.threshold, True), - (constants.DuckPond.threshold + 1, True), - ) - - channel, message, member, payload = self._raw_reaction_mocks(channel_id=3, message_id=4, user_id=5) - - payload.emoji = self.duck_pond_emoji - - for duck_count, should_relay in test_cases: - with patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.relay_message", new_callable=AsyncMock) as relay_message: - with patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.count_ducks", new_callable=AsyncMock) as count_ducks: - count_ducks.return_value = duck_count - with self.subTest(duck_count=duck_count, should_relay=should_relay): - await self.cog.on_raw_reaction_add(payload) - - # Confirm that we've made it past counting - count_ducks.assert_called_once() - - # Did we relay a message? - has_relayed = relay_message.called - self.assertEqual(has_relayed, should_relay) - - if should_relay: - relay_message.assert_called_once_with(message) - - async def test_on_raw_reaction_remove_prevents_removal_of_green_checkmark_depending_on_the_duck_count(self): - """The `on_raw_reaction_remove` listener prevents removal of the check mark on messages with enough ducks.""" - checkmark = helpers.MockPartialEmoji(name=self.checkmark_emoji) - - message = helpers.MockMessage(id=1234) - - channel = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=98765) - channel.fetch_message.return_value = message - - self.bot.get_all_channels.return_value = (channel, ) - - payload = MagicMock(channel_id=channel.id, message_id=message.id, emoji=checkmark) - - test_cases = ( - (constants.DuckPond.threshold - 1, False), - (constants.DuckPond.threshold, True), - (constants.DuckPond.threshold + 1, True), - ) - for duck_count, should_re_add_checkmark in test_cases: - with patch(f"{MODULE_PATH}.DuckPond.count_ducks", new_callable=AsyncMock) as count_ducks: - count_ducks.return_value = duck_count - with self.subTest(duck_count=duck_count, should_re_add_checkmark=should_re_add_checkmark): - await self.cog.on_raw_reaction_remove(payload) - - # Check if we fetched the message - channel.fetch_message.assert_called_once_with(message.id) - - # Check if we actually counted the number of ducks - count_ducks.assert_called_once_with(message) - - has_re_added_checkmark = message.add_reaction.called - self.assertEqual(should_re_add_checkmark, has_re_added_checkmark) - - if should_re_add_checkmark: - message.add_reaction.assert_called_once_with(self.checkmark_emoji) - message.add_reaction.reset_mock() - - # reset mocks - channel.fetch_message.reset_mock() - message.reset_mock() - - def test_on_raw_reaction_remove_ignores_removal_of_non_checkmark_reactions(self): - """The `on_raw_reaction_remove` listener should ignore the removal of non-check mark emojis.""" - channel = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=98765) - - channel.fetch_message.side_effect = AssertionError( - "Expected method to return before calling `channel.fetch_message`" - ) - - self.bot.get_all_channels.return_value = (channel, ) - - payload = MagicMock(emoji=helpers.MockPartialEmoji(name=self.thumbs_up_emoji), channel_id=channel.id) - - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(self.cog.on_raw_reaction_remove(payload))) - - channel.fetch_message.assert_not_called() - - -class DuckPondSetupTests(unittest.TestCase): - """Tests setup of the `DuckPond` cog.""" - - def test_setup(self): - """Setup of the extension should call add_cog.""" - bot = helpers.MockBot() - duck_pond.setup(bot) - bot.add_cog.assert_called_once() diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_token_remover.py b/tests/bot/cogs/test_token_remover.py deleted file mode 100644 index 33d1ec170..000000000 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_token_remover.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,131 +0,0 @@ -import asyncio -import logging -import unittest -from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock - -from discord import Colour - -from bot.cogs.token_remover import ( - DELETION_MESSAGE_TEMPLATE, - TokenRemover, - setup as setup_cog, -) -from bot.constants import Channels, Colours, Event, Icons -from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockMessage - - -class TokenRemoverTests(unittest.TestCase): - """Tests the `TokenRemover` cog.""" - - def setUp(self): - """Adds the cog, a bot, and a message to the instance for usage in tests.""" - self.bot = MockBot() - self.bot.get_cog.return_value = MagicMock() - self.bot.get_cog.return_value.send_log_message = AsyncMock() - self.cog = TokenRemover(bot=self.bot) - - self.msg = MockMessage(id=555, content='') - self.msg.author.__str__ = MagicMock() - self.msg.author.__str__.return_value = 'lemon' - self.msg.author.bot = False - self.msg.author.avatar_url_as.return_value = 'picture-lemon.png' - self.msg.author.id = 42 - self.msg.author.mention = '@lemon' - self.msg.channel.mention = "#lemonade-stand" - - def test_is_valid_user_id_is_true_for_numeric_content(self): - """A string decoding to numeric characters is a valid user ID.""" - # MTIz = base64(123) - self.assertTrue(TokenRemover.is_valid_user_id('MTIz')) - - def test_is_valid_user_id_is_false_for_alphabetic_content(self): - """A string decoding to alphabetic characters is not a valid user ID.""" - # YWJj = base64(abc) - self.assertFalse(TokenRemover.is_valid_user_id('YWJj')) - - def test_is_valid_timestamp_is_true_for_valid_timestamps(self): - """A string decoding to a valid timestamp should be recognized as such.""" - self.assertTrue(TokenRemover.is_valid_timestamp('DN9r_A')) - - def test_is_valid_timestamp_is_false_for_invalid_values(self): - """A string not decoding to a valid timestamp should not be recognized as such.""" - # MTIz = base64(123) - self.assertFalse(TokenRemover.is_valid_timestamp('MTIz')) - - def test_mod_log_property(self): - """The `mod_log` property should ask the bot to return the `ModLog` cog.""" - self.bot.get_cog.return_value = 'lemon' - self.assertEqual(self.cog.mod_log, self.bot.get_cog.return_value) - self.bot.get_cog.assert_called_once_with('ModLog') - - def test_ignores_bot_messages(self): - """When the message event handler is called with a bot message, nothing is done.""" - self.msg.author.bot = True - coroutine = self.cog.on_message(self.msg) - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(coroutine)) - - def test_ignores_messages_without_tokens(self): - """Messages without anything looking like a token are ignored.""" - for content in ('', 'lemon wins'): - with self.subTest(content=content): - self.msg.content = content - coroutine = self.cog.on_message(self.msg) - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(coroutine)) - - def test_ignores_messages_with_invalid_tokens(self): - """Messages with values that are invalid tokens are ignored.""" - for content in ('foo.bar.baz', 'x.y.'): - with self.subTest(content=content): - self.msg.content = content - coroutine = self.cog.on_message(self.msg) - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(coroutine)) - - def test_censors_valid_tokens(self): - """Valid tokens are censored.""" - cases = ( - # (content, censored_token) - ('MTIz.DN9R_A.xyz', 'MTIz.DN9R_A.xxx'), - ) - - for content, censored_token in cases: - with self.subTest(content=content, censored_token=censored_token): - self.msg.content = content - coroutine = self.cog.on_message(self.msg) - with self.assertLogs(logger='bot.cogs.token_remover', level=logging.DEBUG) as cm: - self.assertIsNone(asyncio.run(coroutine)) # no return value - - [line] = cm.output - log_message = ( - "Censored a seemingly valid token sent by " - "lemon (`42`) in #lemonade-stand, " - f"token was `{censored_token}`" - ) - self.assertIn(log_message, line) - - self.msg.delete.assert_called_once_with() - self.msg.channel.send.assert_called_once_with( - DELETION_MESSAGE_TEMPLATE.format(mention='@lemon') - ) - self.bot.get_cog.assert_called_with('ModLog') - self.msg.author.avatar_url_as.assert_called_once_with(static_format='png') - - mod_log = self.bot.get_cog.return_value - mod_log.ignore.assert_called_once_with(Event.message_delete, self.msg.id) - mod_log.send_log_message.assert_called_once_with( - icon_url=Icons.token_removed, - colour=Colour(Colours.soft_red), - title="Token removed!", - text=log_message, - thumbnail='picture-lemon.png', - channel_id=Channels.mod_alerts - ) - - -class TokenRemoverSetupTests(unittest.TestCase): - """Tests setup of the `TokenRemover` cog.""" - - def test_setup(self): - """Setup of the extension should call add_cog.""" - bot = MockBot() - setup_cog(bot) - bot.add_cog.assert_called_once() diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/__init__.py index e69de29bb..e69de29bb 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/__init__.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/__init__.py index e69de29bb..e69de29bb 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/__init__.py index e69de29bb..e69de29bb 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/__init__.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_base.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_base.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4953550f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_base.py @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +import unittest +from unittest import mock + + +from bot.api import ResponseCodeError +from bot.exts.backend.sync._syncers import Syncer +from tests import helpers + + +class TestSyncer(Syncer): + """Syncer subclass with mocks for abstract methods for testing purposes.""" + + name = "test" + _get_diff = mock.AsyncMock() + _sync = mock.AsyncMock() + + +class SyncerBaseTests(unittest.TestCase): + """Tests for the syncer base class.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = helpers.MockBot() + + def test_instantiation_fails_without_abstract_methods(self): + """The class must have abstract methods implemented.""" + with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, "Can't instantiate abstract class"): + Syncer(self.bot) + + +class SyncerSyncTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests for main function orchestrating the sync.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = helpers.MockBot(user=helpers.MockMember(bot=True)) + self.syncer = TestSyncer(self.bot) + self.guild = helpers.MockGuild() + + # Make sure `_get_diff` returns a MagicMock, not an AsyncMock + self.syncer._get_diff.return_value = mock.MagicMock() + + async def test_sync_message_edited(self): + """The message should be edited if one was sent, even if the sync has an API error.""" + subtests = ( + (None, None, False), + (helpers.MockMessage(), None, True), + (helpers.MockMessage(), ResponseCodeError(mock.MagicMock()), True), + ) + + for message, side_effect, should_edit in subtests: + with self.subTest(message=message, side_effect=side_effect, should_edit=should_edit): + self.syncer._sync.side_effect = side_effect + ctx = helpers.MockContext() + ctx.send.return_value = message + + await self.syncer.sync(self.guild, ctx) + + if should_edit: + message.edit.assert_called_once() + self.assertIn("content", message.edit.call_args[1]) + + async def test_sync_message_sent(self): + """If ctx is given, a new message should be sent.""" + subtests = ( + (None, None), + (helpers.MockContext(), helpers.MockMessage()), + ) + + for ctx, message in subtests: + with self.subTest(ctx=ctx, message=message): + await self.syncer.sync(self.guild, ctx) + + if ctx is not None: + ctx.send.assert_called_once() diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_cog.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_cog.py index a4745f7b4..063a82754 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_cog.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_cog.py @@ -5,8 +5,9 @@ import discord from bot import constants from bot.api import ResponseCodeError -from bot.cogs import sync -from bot.cogs.sync.syncers import Syncer +from bot.exts.backend import sync +from bot.exts.backend.sync._cog import Sync +from bot.exts.backend.sync._syncers import Syncer from tests import helpers from tests.base import CommandTestCase @@ -29,19 +30,19 @@ class SyncCogTestCase(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.bot = helpers.MockBot() self.role_syncer_patcher = mock.patch( - "bot.cogs.sync.syncers.RoleSyncer", + "bot.exts.backend.sync._syncers.RoleSyncer", autospec=Syncer, spec_set=True ) self.user_syncer_patcher = mock.patch( - "bot.cogs.sync.syncers.UserSyncer", + "bot.exts.backend.sync._syncers.UserSyncer", autospec=Syncer, spec_set=True ) self.RoleSyncer = self.role_syncer_patcher.start() self.UserSyncer = self.user_syncer_patcher.start() - self.cog = sync.Sync(self.bot) + self.cog = Sync(self.bot) def tearDown(self): self.role_syncer_patcher.stop() @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ class SyncCogTestCase(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): class SyncCogTests(SyncCogTestCase): """Tests for the Sync cog.""" - @mock.patch.object(sync.Sync, "sync_guild", new_callable=mock.MagicMock) + @mock.patch.object(Sync, "sync_guild", new_callable=mock.MagicMock) def test_sync_cog_init(self, sync_guild): """Should instantiate syncers and run a sync for the guild.""" # Reset because a Sync cog was already instantiated in setUp. @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ class SyncCogTests(SyncCogTestCase): mock_sync_guild_coro = mock.MagicMock() sync_guild.return_value = mock_sync_guild_coro - sync.Sync(self.bot) + Sync(self.bot) self.RoleSyncer.assert_called_once_with(self.bot) self.UserSyncer.assert_called_once_with(self.bot) @@ -131,6 +132,15 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): super().setUp() self.cog.patch_user = mock.AsyncMock(spec_set=self.cog.patch_user) + self.guild_id_patcher = mock.patch("bot.exts.backend.sync._cog.constants.Guild.id", 5) + self.guild_id = self.guild_id_patcher.start() + + self.guild = helpers.MockGuild(id=self.guild_id) + self.other_guild = helpers.MockGuild(id=0) + + def tearDown(self): + self.guild_id_patcher.stop() + async def test_sync_cog_on_guild_role_create(self): """A POST request should be sent with the new role's data.""" self.assertTrue(self.cog.on_guild_role_create.__cog_listener__) @@ -142,20 +152,32 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): "permissions": 8, "position": 23, } - role = helpers.MockRole(**role_data) + role = helpers.MockRole(**role_data, guild=self.guild) await self.cog.on_guild_role_create(role) self.bot.api_client.post.assert_called_once_with("bot/roles", json=role_data) + async def test_sync_cog_on_guild_role_create_ignores_guilds(self): + """Events from other guilds should be ignored.""" + role = helpers.MockRole(guild=self.other_guild) + await self.cog.on_guild_role_create(role) + self.bot.api_client.post.assert_not_awaited() + async def test_sync_cog_on_guild_role_delete(self): """A DELETE request should be sent.""" self.assertTrue(self.cog.on_guild_role_delete.__cog_listener__) - role = helpers.MockRole(id=99) + role = helpers.MockRole(id=99, guild=self.guild) await self.cog.on_guild_role_delete(role) self.bot.api_client.delete.assert_called_once_with("bot/roles/99") + async def test_sync_cog_on_guild_role_delete_ignores_guilds(self): + """Events from other guilds should be ignored.""" + role = helpers.MockRole(guild=self.other_guild) + await self.cog.on_guild_role_delete(role) + self.bot.api_client.delete.assert_not_awaited() + async def test_sync_cog_on_guild_role_update(self): """A PUT request should be sent if the colour, name, permissions, or position changes.""" self.assertTrue(self.cog.on_guild_role_update.__cog_listener__) @@ -180,8 +202,8 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): after_role_data = role_data.copy() after_role_data[attribute] = 876 - before_role = helpers.MockRole(**role_data) - after_role = helpers.MockRole(**after_role_data) + before_role = helpers.MockRole(**role_data, guild=self.guild) + after_role = helpers.MockRole(**after_role_data, guild=self.guild) await self.cog.on_guild_role_update(before_role, after_role) @@ -193,31 +215,43 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): else: self.bot.api_client.put.assert_not_called() + async def test_sync_cog_on_guild_role_update_ignores_guilds(self): + """Events from other guilds should be ignored.""" + role = helpers.MockRole(guild=self.other_guild) + await self.cog.on_guild_role_update(role, role) + self.bot.api_client.put.assert_not_awaited() + async def test_sync_cog_on_member_remove(self): - """Member should patched to set in_guild as False.""" + """Member should be patched to set in_guild as False.""" self.assertTrue(self.cog.on_member_remove.__cog_listener__) - member = helpers.MockMember() + member = helpers.MockMember(guild=self.guild) await self.cog.on_member_remove(member) self.cog.patch_user.assert_called_once_with( member.id, - updated_information={"in_guild": False} + json={"in_guild": False} ) + async def test_sync_cog_on_member_remove_ignores_guilds(self): + """Events from other guilds should be ignored.""" + member = helpers.MockMember(guild=self.other_guild) + await self.cog.on_member_remove(member) + self.cog.patch_user.assert_not_awaited() + async def test_sync_cog_on_member_update_roles(self): """Members should be patched if their roles have changed.""" self.assertTrue(self.cog.on_member_update.__cog_listener__) # Roles are intentionally unsorted. before_roles = [helpers.MockRole(id=12), helpers.MockRole(id=30), helpers.MockRole(id=20)] - before_member = helpers.MockMember(roles=before_roles) - after_member = helpers.MockMember(roles=before_roles[1:]) + before_member = helpers.MockMember(roles=before_roles, guild=self.guild) + after_member = helpers.MockMember(roles=before_roles[1:], guild=self.guild) await self.cog.on_member_update(before_member, after_member) data = {"roles": sorted(role.id for role in after_member.roles)} - self.cog.patch_user.assert_called_once_with(after_member.id, updated_information=data) + self.cog.patch_user.assert_called_once_with(after_member.id, json=data) async def test_sync_cog_on_member_update_other(self): """Members should not be patched if other attributes have changed.""" @@ -233,13 +267,19 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): with self.subTest(attribute=attribute): self.cog.patch_user.reset_mock() - before_member = helpers.MockMember(**{attribute: old_value}) - after_member = helpers.MockMember(**{attribute: new_value}) + before_member = helpers.MockMember(**{attribute: old_value}, guild=self.guild) + after_member = helpers.MockMember(**{attribute: new_value}, guild=self.guild) await self.cog.on_member_update(before_member, after_member) self.cog.patch_user.assert_not_called() + async def test_sync_cog_on_member_update_ignores_guilds(self): + """Events from other guilds should be ignored.""" + member = helpers.MockMember(guild=self.other_guild) + await self.cog.on_member_update(member, member) + self.cog.patch_user.assert_not_awaited() + async def test_sync_cog_on_user_update(self): """A user should be patched only if the name, discriminator, or avatar changes.""" self.assertTrue(self.cog.on_user_update.__cog_listener__) @@ -247,14 +287,12 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): before_data = { "name": "old name", "discriminator": "1234", - "avatar": "old avatar", "bot": False, } subtests = ( (True, "name", "name", "new name", "new name"), (True, "discriminator", "discriminator", "8765", 8765), - (True, "avatar", "avatar_hash", "9j2e9", "9j2e9"), (False, "bot", "bot", True, True), ) @@ -274,12 +312,15 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): # Don't care if *all* keys are present; only the changed one is required call_args = self.cog.patch_user.call_args - self.assertEqual(call_args[0][0], after_user.id) - self.assertIn("updated_information", call_args[1]) + self.assertEqual(call_args.args[0], after_user.id) + self.assertIn("json", call_args.kwargs) + + self.assertIn("ignore_404", call_args.kwargs) + self.assertTrue(call_args.kwargs["ignore_404"]) - updated_information = call_args[1]["updated_information"] - self.assertIn(api_field, updated_information) - self.assertEqual(updated_information[api_field], api_value) + json = call_args.kwargs["json"] + self.assertIn(api_field, json) + self.assertEqual(json[api_field], api_value) else: self.cog.patch_user.assert_not_called() @@ -292,10 +333,10 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): member = helpers.MockMember( discriminator="1234", roles=[helpers.MockRole(id=22), helpers.MockRole(id=12)], + guild=self.guild, ) data = { - "avatar_hash": member.avatar, "discriminator": int(member.discriminator), "id": member.id, "in_guild": True, @@ -337,6 +378,13 @@ class SyncCogListenerTests(SyncCogTestCase): self.bot.api_client.post.assert_not_called() + async def test_sync_cog_on_member_join_ignores_guilds(self): + """Events from other guilds should be ignored.""" + member = helpers.MockMember(guild=self.other_guild) + await self.cog.on_member_join(member) + self.bot.api_client.post.assert_not_awaited() + self.bot.api_client.put.assert_not_awaited() + class SyncCogCommandTests(SyncCogTestCase, CommandTestCase): """Tests for the commands in the Sync cog.""" diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_roles.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_roles.py index 79eee98f4..7b9f40cad 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_roles.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_roles.py @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ from unittest import mock import discord -from bot.cogs.sync.syncers import RoleSyncer, _Diff, _Role +from bot.exts.backend.sync._syncers import RoleSyncer, _Diff, _Role from tests import helpers diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_users.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_users.py index 818883012..c0a1da35c 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/sync/test_users.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/sync/test_users.py @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ import unittest from unittest import mock -from bot.cogs.sync.syncers import UserSyncer, _Diff, _User +from bot.exts.backend.sync._syncers import UserSyncer, _Diff, _User from tests import helpers @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ def fake_user(**kwargs): kwargs.setdefault("id", 43) kwargs.setdefault("name", "bob the test man") kwargs.setdefault("discriminator", 1337) - kwargs.setdefault("avatar_hash", None) kwargs.setdefault("roles", (666,)) kwargs.setdefault("in_guild", True) @@ -32,7 +31,6 @@ class UserSyncerDiffTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): for member in members: member = member.copy() - member["avatar"] = member.pop("avatar_hash") del member["in_guild"] mock_member = helpers.MockMember(**member) diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/backend/test_logging.py b/tests/bot/exts/backend/test_logging.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..466f207d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/backend/test_logging.py @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +import unittest +from unittest.mock import patch + +from bot import constants +from bot.exts.backend.logging import Logging +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockTextChannel + + +class LoggingTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Test cases for connected login.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = MockBot() + self.cog = Logging(self.bot) + self.dev_log = MockTextChannel(id=1234, name="dev-log") + + @patch("bot.exts.backend.logging.DEBUG_MODE", False) + async def test_debug_mode_false(self): + """Should send connected message to dev-log.""" + self.bot.get_channel.return_value = self.dev_log + + await self.cog.startup_greeting() + self.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_awaited_once_with() + self.bot.get_channel.assert_called_once_with(constants.Channels.dev_log) + self.dev_log.send.assert_awaited_once() + + @patch("bot.exts.backend.logging.DEBUG_MODE", True) + async def test_debug_mode_true(self): + """Should not send anything to dev-log.""" + await self.cog.startup_greeting() + self.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_awaited_once_with() + self.bot.get_channel.assert_not_called() diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/filters/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/filters/__init__.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e69de29bb --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/filters/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_antimalware.py b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_antimalware.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3393c6cdc --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_antimalware.py @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, Mock + +from discord import NotFound + +from bot.constants import Channels, STAFF_ROLES +from bot.exts.filters import antimalware +from tests.helpers import MockAttachment, MockBot, MockMessage, MockRole + + +class AntiMalwareCogTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Test the AntiMalware cog.""" + + def setUp(self): + """Sets up fresh objects for each test.""" + self.bot = MockBot() + self.bot.filter_list_cache = { + "FILE_FORMAT.True": { + ".first": {}, + ".second": {}, + ".third": {}, + } + } + self.cog = antimalware.AntiMalware(self.bot) + self.message = MockMessage() + self.message.webhook_id = None + self.message.author.bot = None + self.whitelist = [".first", ".second", ".third"] + + async def test_message_with_allowed_attachment(self): + """Messages with allowed extensions should not be deleted""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.first") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + self.message.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_message_without_attachment(self): + """Messages without attachments should result in no action.""" + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + self.message.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_direct_message_with_attachment(self): + """Direct messages should have no action taken.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + self.message.guild = None + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + + self.message.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_webhook_message_with_illegal_extension(self): + """A webhook message containing an illegal extension should be ignored.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.webhook_id = 697140105563078727 + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + + self.message.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_bot_message_with_illegal_extension(self): + """A bot message containing an illegal extension should be ignored.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.author.bot = 409107086526644234 + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + + self.message.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_message_with_illegal_extension_gets_deleted(self): + """A message containing an illegal extension should send an embed.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + + self.message.delete.assert_called_once() + + async def test_message_send_by_staff(self): + """A message send by a member of staff should be ignored.""" + staff_role = MockRole(id=STAFF_ROLES[0]) + self.message.author.roles.append(staff_role) + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + + self.message.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_python_file_redirect_embed_description(self): + """A message containing a .py file should result in an embed redirecting the user to our paste site""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.py") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + self.message.channel.send = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + self.message.channel.send.assert_called_once() + args, kwargs = self.message.channel.send.call_args + embed = kwargs.pop("embed") + + self.assertEqual(embed.description, antimalware.PY_EMBED_DESCRIPTION) + + async def test_txt_file_redirect_embed_description(self): + """A message containing a .txt file should result in the correct embed.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.txt") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + self.message.channel.send = AsyncMock() + antimalware.TXT_EMBED_DESCRIPTION = Mock() + antimalware.TXT_EMBED_DESCRIPTION.format.return_value = "test" + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + self.message.channel.send.assert_called_once() + args, kwargs = self.message.channel.send.call_args + embed = kwargs.pop("embed") + cmd_channel = self.bot.get_channel(Channels.bot_commands) + + self.assertEqual(embed.description, antimalware.TXT_EMBED_DESCRIPTION.format.return_value) + antimalware.TXT_EMBED_DESCRIPTION.format.assert_called_with(cmd_channel_mention=cmd_channel.mention) + + async def test_other_disallowed_extension_embed_description(self): + """Test the description for a non .py/.txt disallowed extension.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + self.message.channel.send = AsyncMock() + antimalware.DISALLOWED_EMBED_DESCRIPTION = Mock() + antimalware.DISALLOWED_EMBED_DESCRIPTION.format.return_value = "test" + + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + self.message.channel.send.assert_called_once() + args, kwargs = self.message.channel.send.call_args + embed = kwargs.pop("embed") + meta_channel = self.bot.get_channel(Channels.meta) + + self.assertEqual(embed.description, antimalware.DISALLOWED_EMBED_DESCRIPTION.format.return_value) + antimalware.DISALLOWED_EMBED_DESCRIPTION.format.assert_called_with( + joined_whitelist=", ".join(self.whitelist), + blocked_extensions_str=".disallowed", + meta_channel_mention=meta_channel.mention + ) + + async def test_removing_deleted_message_logs(self): + """Removing an already deleted message logs the correct message""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + self.message.delete = AsyncMock(side_effect=NotFound(response=Mock(status=""), message="")) + + with self.assertLogs(logger=antimalware.log, level="INFO"): + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + self.message.delete.assert_called_once() + + async def test_message_with_illegal_attachment_logs(self): + """Deleting a message with an illegal attachment should result in a log.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="python.disallowed") + self.message.attachments = [attachment] + + with self.assertLogs(logger=antimalware.log, level="INFO"): + await self.cog.on_message(self.message) + + async def test_get_disallowed_extensions(self): + """The return value should include all non-whitelisted extensions.""" + test_values = ( + ([], []), + (self.whitelist, []), + ([".first"], []), + ([".first", ".disallowed"], [".disallowed"]), + ([".disallowed"], [".disallowed"]), + ([".disallowed", ".illegal"], [".disallowed", ".illegal"]), + ) + + for extensions, expected_disallowed_extensions in test_values: + with self.subTest(extensions=extensions, expected_disallowed_extensions=expected_disallowed_extensions): + self.message.attachments = [MockAttachment(filename=f"filename{extension}") for extension in extensions] + disallowed_extensions = self.cog._get_disallowed_extensions(self.message) + self.assertCountEqual(disallowed_extensions, expected_disallowed_extensions) + + +class AntiMalwareSetupTests(unittest.TestCase): + """Tests setup of the `AntiMalware` cog.""" + + def test_setup(self): + """Setup of the extension should call add_cog.""" + bot = MockBot() + antimalware.setup(bot) + bot.add_cog.assert_called_once() diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_antispam.py b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_antispam.py index ce5472c71..6a0e4fded 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_antispam.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_antispam.py @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ import unittest -from bot.cogs import antispam +from bot.exts.filters import antispam class AntispamConfigurationValidationTests(unittest.TestCase): diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_security.py b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_security.py index 9d1a62f7e..c0c3baa42 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_security.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_security.py @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ from unittest.mock import MagicMock from discord.ext.commands import NoPrivateMessage -from bot.cogs import security +from bot.exts.filters import security from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_token_remover.py b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_token_remover.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f99cc3370 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/filters/test_token_remover.py @@ -0,0 +1,408 @@ +import unittest +from re import Match +from unittest import mock +from unittest.mock import MagicMock + +from discord import Colour, NotFound + +from bot import constants +from bot.exts.filters import token_remover +from bot.exts.filters.token_remover import Token, TokenRemover +from bot.exts.moderation.modlog import ModLog +from bot.utils.messages import format_user +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockMessage, autospec + + +class TokenRemoverTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests the `TokenRemover` cog.""" + + def setUp(self): + """Adds the cog, a bot, and a message to the instance for usage in tests.""" + self.bot = MockBot() + self.cog = TokenRemover(bot=self.bot) + + self.msg = MockMessage(id=555, content="hello world") + self.msg.channel.mention = "#lemonade-stand" + self.msg.guild.get_member.return_value.bot = False + self.msg.guild.get_member.return_value.__str__.return_value = "Woody" + self.msg.author.__str__ = MagicMock(return_value=self.msg.author.name) + self.msg.author.avatar_url_as.return_value = "picture-lemon.png" + + def test_extract_user_id_valid(self): + """Should consider user IDs valid if they decode into an integer ID.""" + id_pairs = ( + ("NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYyNDEzMzMy", 472265943062413332), + ("NDc1MDczNjI5Mzk5NTQ3OTA0", 475073629399547904), + ("NDY3MjIzMjMwNjUwNzc3NjQx", 467223230650777641), + ) + + for token_id, user_id in id_pairs: + with self.subTest(token_id=token_id): + result = TokenRemover.extract_user_id(token_id) + self.assertEqual(result, user_id) + + def test_extract_user_id_invalid(self): + """Should consider non-digit and non-ASCII IDs invalid.""" + ids = ( + ("SGVsbG8gd29ybGQ", "non-digit ASCII"), + ("0J_RgNC40LLQtdGCINC80LjRgA", "cyrillic text"), + ("4pO14p6L4p6C4pG34p264pGl8J-EiOKSj-KCieKBsA", "Unicode digits"), + ("4oaA4oaB4oWh4oWi4Lyz4Lyq4Lyr4LG9", "Unicode numerals"), + ("8J2fjvCdn5nwnZ-k8J2fr_Cdn7rgravvvJngr6c", "Unicode decimals"), + ("{hello}[world]&(bye!)", "ASCII invalid Base64"), + ("Þíß-ï§-ňøẗ-våłìÐ", "Unicode invalid Base64"), + ) + + for user_id, msg in ids: + with self.subTest(msg=msg): + result = TokenRemover.extract_user_id(user_id) + self.assertIsNone(result) + + def test_is_valid_timestamp_valid(self): + """Should consider timestamps valid if they're greater than the Discord epoch.""" + timestamps = ( + "XsyRkw", + "Xrim9Q", + "XsyR-w", + "XsySD_", + "Dn9r_A", + ) + + for timestamp in timestamps: + with self.subTest(timestamp=timestamp): + result = TokenRemover.is_valid_timestamp(timestamp) + self.assertTrue(result) + + def test_is_valid_timestamp_invalid(self): + """Should consider timestamps invalid if they're before Discord epoch or can't be parsed.""" + timestamps = ( + ("B4Yffw", "DISCORD_EPOCH - TOKEN_EPOCH - 1"), + ("ew", "123"), + ("AoIKgA", "42076800"), + ("{hello}[world]&(bye!)", "ASCII invalid Base64"), + ("Þíß-ï§-ňøẗ-våłìÐ", "Unicode invalid Base64"), + ) + + for timestamp, msg in timestamps: + with self.subTest(msg=msg): + result = TokenRemover.is_valid_timestamp(timestamp) + self.assertFalse(result) + + def test_is_valid_hmac_valid(self): + """Should consider an HMAC valid if it has at least 3 unique characters.""" + valid_hmacs = ( + "VXmErH7j511turNpfURmb0rVNm8", + "Ysnu2wacjaKs7qnoo46S8Dm2us8", + "sJf6omBPORBPju3WJEIAcwW9Zds", + "s45jqDV_Iisn-symw0yDRrk_jf4", + ) + + for hmac in valid_hmacs: + with self.subTest(msg=hmac): + result = TokenRemover.is_maybe_valid_hmac(hmac) + self.assertTrue(result) + + def test_is_invalid_hmac_invalid(self): + """Should consider an HMAC invalid if has fewer than 3 unique characters.""" + invalid_hmacs = ( + ("xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "Single character"), + ("XxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxXx", "Single character alternating case"), + ("ASFasfASFasfASFASsf", "Three characters alternating-case"), + ("asdasdasdasdasdasdasd", "Three characters one case"), + ) + + for hmac, msg in invalid_hmacs: + with self.subTest(msg=msg): + result = TokenRemover.is_maybe_valid_hmac(hmac) + self.assertFalse(result) + + def test_mod_log_property(self): + """The `mod_log` property should ask the bot to return the `ModLog` cog.""" + self.bot.get_cog.return_value = 'lemon' + self.assertEqual(self.cog.mod_log, self.bot.get_cog.return_value) + self.bot.get_cog.assert_called_once_with('ModLog') + + async def test_on_message_edit_uses_on_message(self): + """The edit listener should delegate handling of the message to the normal listener.""" + self.cog.on_message = mock.create_autospec(self.cog.on_message, spec_set=True) + + await self.cog.on_message_edit(MockMessage(), self.msg) + self.cog.on_message.assert_awaited_once_with(self.msg) + + @autospec(TokenRemover, "find_token_in_message", "take_action") + async def test_on_message_takes_action(self, find_token_in_message, take_action): + """Should take action if a valid token is found when a message is sent.""" + cog = TokenRemover(self.bot) + found_token = "foobar" + find_token_in_message.return_value = found_token + + await cog.on_message(self.msg) + + find_token_in_message.assert_called_once_with(self.msg) + take_action.assert_awaited_once_with(cog, self.msg, found_token) + + @autospec(TokenRemover, "find_token_in_message", "take_action") + async def test_on_message_skips_missing_token(self, find_token_in_message, take_action): + """Shouldn't take action if a valid token isn't found when a message is sent.""" + cog = TokenRemover(self.bot) + find_token_in_message.return_value = False + + await cog.on_message(self.msg) + + find_token_in_message.assert_called_once_with(self.msg) + take_action.assert_not_awaited() + + @autospec(TokenRemover, "find_token_in_message") + async def test_on_message_ignores_dms_bots(self, find_token_in_message): + """Shouldn't parse a message if it is a DM or authored by a bot.""" + cog = TokenRemover(self.bot) + dm_msg = MockMessage(guild=None) + bot_msg = MockMessage(author=MagicMock(bot=True)) + + for msg in (dm_msg, bot_msg): + await cog.on_message(msg) + find_token_in_message.assert_not_called() + + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "TOKEN_RE") + def test_find_token_no_matches(self, token_re): + """None should be returned if the regex matches no tokens in a message.""" + token_re.finditer.return_value = () + + return_value = TokenRemover.find_token_in_message(self.msg) + + self.assertIsNone(return_value) + token_re.finditer.assert_called_once_with(self.msg.content) + + @autospec(TokenRemover, "extract_user_id", "is_valid_timestamp", "is_maybe_valid_hmac") + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "Token") + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "TOKEN_RE") + def test_find_token_valid_match( + self, + token_re, + token_cls, + extract_user_id, + is_valid_timestamp, + is_maybe_valid_hmac, + ): + """The first match with a valid user ID, timestamp, and HMAC should be returned as a `Token`.""" + matches = [ + mock.create_autospec(Match, spec_set=True, instance=True), + mock.create_autospec(Match, spec_set=True, instance=True), + ] + tokens = [ + mock.create_autospec(Token, spec_set=True, instance=True), + mock.create_autospec(Token, spec_set=True, instance=True), + ] + + token_re.finditer.return_value = matches + token_cls.side_effect = tokens + extract_user_id.side_effect = (None, True) # The 1st match will be invalid, 2nd one valid. + is_valid_timestamp.return_value = True + is_maybe_valid_hmac.return_value = True + + return_value = TokenRemover.find_token_in_message(self.msg) + + self.assertEqual(tokens[1], return_value) + token_re.finditer.assert_called_once_with(self.msg.content) + + @autospec(TokenRemover, "extract_user_id", "is_valid_timestamp", "is_maybe_valid_hmac") + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "Token") + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "TOKEN_RE") + def test_find_token_invalid_matches( + self, + token_re, + token_cls, + extract_user_id, + is_valid_timestamp, + is_maybe_valid_hmac, + ): + """None should be returned if no matches have valid user IDs, HMACs, and timestamps.""" + token_re.finditer.return_value = [mock.create_autospec(Match, spec_set=True, instance=True)] + token_cls.return_value = mock.create_autospec(Token, spec_set=True, instance=True) + extract_user_id.return_value = None + is_valid_timestamp.return_value = False + is_maybe_valid_hmac.return_value = False + + return_value = TokenRemover.find_token_in_message(self.msg) + + self.assertIsNone(return_value) + token_re.finditer.assert_called_once_with(self.msg.content) + + def test_regex_invalid_tokens(self): + """Messages without anything looking like a token are not matched.""" + tokens = ( + "", + "lemon wins", + "..", + "x.y", + "x.y.", + ".y.z", + ".y.", + "..z", + "x..z", + " . . ", + "\n.\n.\n", + "hellö.world.bye", + "base64.nötbåse64.morebase64", + "19jd3J.dfkm3d.€víł§tüff", + ) + + for token in tokens: + with self.subTest(token=token): + results = token_remover.TOKEN_RE.findall(token) + self.assertEqual(len(results), 0) + + def test_regex_valid_tokens(self): + """Messages that look like tokens should be matched.""" + # Don't worry, these tokens have been invalidated. + tokens = ( + "NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYy_DEzMz-y.XsyRkw.VXmErH7j511turNpfURmb0rVNm8", + "NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYyNDEzMzMy.Xrim9Q.Ysnu2wacjaKs7qnoo46S8Dm2us8", + "NDc1MDczNjI5Mzk5NTQ3OTA0.XsyR-w.sJf6omBPORBPju3WJEIAcwW9Zds", + "NDY3MjIzMjMwNjUwNzc3NjQx.XsySD_.s45jqDV_Iisn-symw0yDRrk_jf4", + ) + + for token in tokens: + with self.subTest(token=token): + results = token_remover.TOKEN_RE.fullmatch(token) + self.assertIsNotNone(results, f"{token} was not matched by the regex") + + def test_regex_matches_multiple_valid(self): + """Should support multiple matches in the middle of a string.""" + token_1 = "NDY3MjIzMjMwNjUwNzc3NjQx.XsyWGg.uFNEQPCc4ePwGh7egG8UicQssz8" + token_2 = "NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYyNDEzMzMy.XsyWMw.l8XPnDqb0lp-EiQ2g_0xVFT1pyc" + message = f"garbage {token_1} hello {token_2} world" + + results = token_remover.TOKEN_RE.finditer(message) + results = [match[0] for match in results] + self.assertCountEqual((token_1, token_2), results) + + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "LOG_MESSAGE") + def test_format_log_message(self, log_message): + """Should correctly format the log message with info from the message and token.""" + token = Token("NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYyNDEzMzMy", "XsySD_", "s45jqDV_Iisn-symw0yDRrk_jf4") + log_message.format.return_value = "Howdy" + + return_value = TokenRemover.format_log_message(self.msg, token) + + self.assertEqual(return_value, log_message.format.return_value) + log_message.format.assert_called_once_with( + author=format_user(self.msg.author), + channel=self.msg.channel.mention, + user_id=token.user_id, + timestamp=token.timestamp, + hmac="x" * len(token.hmac), + ) + + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "UNKNOWN_USER_LOG_MESSAGE") + def test_format_userid_log_message_unknown(self, unknown_user_log_message): + """Should correctly format the user ID portion when the actual user it belongs to is unknown.""" + token = Token("NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYyNDEzMzMy", "XsySD_", "s45jqDV_Iisn-symw0yDRrk_jf4") + unknown_user_log_message.format.return_value = " Partner" + msg = MockMessage(id=555, content="hello world") + msg.guild.get_member.return_value = None + + return_value = TokenRemover.format_userid_log_message(msg, token) + + self.assertEqual(return_value, (unknown_user_log_message.format.return_value, False)) + unknown_user_log_message.format.assert_called_once_with(user_id=472265943062413332) + + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "KNOWN_USER_LOG_MESSAGE") + def test_format_userid_log_message_bot(self, known_user_log_message): + """Should correctly format the user ID portion when the ID belongs to a known bot.""" + token = Token("NDcyMjY1OTQzMDYyNDEzMzMy", "XsySD_", "s45jqDV_Iisn-symw0yDRrk_jf4") + known_user_log_message.format.return_value = " Partner" + msg = MockMessage(id=555, content="hello world") + msg.guild.get_member.return_value.__str__.return_value = "Sam" + msg.guild.get_member.return_value.bot = True + + return_value = TokenRemover.format_userid_log_message(msg, token) + + self.assertEqual(return_value, (known_user_log_message.format.return_value, False)) + + known_user_log_message.format.assert_called_once_with( + user_id=472265943062413332, + user_name="Sam", + kind="BOT", + ) + + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "KNOWN_USER_LOG_MESSAGE") + def test_format_log_message_user_token_user(self, user_token_message): + """Should correctly format the user ID portion when the ID belongs to a known user.""" + token = Token("NDY3MjIzMjMwNjUwNzc3NjQx", "XsySD_", "s45jqDV_Iisn-symw0yDRrk_jf4") + user_token_message.format.return_value = "Partner" + + return_value = TokenRemover.format_userid_log_message(self.msg, token) + + self.assertEqual(return_value, (user_token_message.format.return_value, True)) + user_token_message.format.assert_called_once_with( + user_id=467223230650777641, + user_name="Woody", + kind="USER", + ) + + @mock.patch.object(TokenRemover, "mod_log", new_callable=mock.PropertyMock) + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "log") + @autospec(TokenRemover, "format_log_message", "format_userid_log_message") + async def test_take_action(self, format_log_message, format_userid_log_message, logger, mod_log_property): + """Should delete the message and send a mod log.""" + cog = TokenRemover(self.bot) + mod_log = mock.create_autospec(ModLog, spec_set=True, instance=True) + token = mock.create_autospec(Token, spec_set=True, instance=True) + token.user_id = "no-id" + log_msg = "testing123" + userid_log_message = "userid-log-message" + + mod_log_property.return_value = mod_log + format_log_message.return_value = log_msg + format_userid_log_message.return_value = (userid_log_message, True) + + await cog.take_action(self.msg, token) + + self.msg.delete.assert_called_once_with() + self.msg.channel.send.assert_called_once_with( + token_remover.DELETION_MESSAGE_TEMPLATE.format(mention=self.msg.author.mention) + ) + + format_log_message.assert_called_once_with(self.msg, token) + format_userid_log_message.assert_called_once_with(self.msg, token) + logger.debug.assert_called_with(log_msg) + self.bot.stats.incr.assert_called_once_with("tokens.removed_tokens") + + mod_log.ignore.assert_called_once_with(constants.Event.message_delete, self.msg.id) + mod_log.send_log_message.assert_called_once_with( + icon_url=constants.Icons.token_removed, + colour=Colour(constants.Colours.soft_red), + title="Token removed!", + text=log_msg + "\n" + userid_log_message, + thumbnail=self.msg.author.avatar_url_as.return_value, + channel_id=constants.Channels.mod_alerts, + ping_everyone=True, + ) + + @mock.patch.object(TokenRemover, "mod_log", new_callable=mock.PropertyMock) + async def test_take_action_delete_failure(self, mod_log_property): + """Shouldn't send any messages if the token message can't be deleted.""" + cog = TokenRemover(self.bot) + mod_log_property.return_value = mock.create_autospec(ModLog, spec_set=True, instance=True) + self.msg.delete.side_effect = NotFound(MagicMock(), MagicMock()) + + token = mock.create_autospec(Token, spec_set=True, instance=True) + await cog.take_action(self.msg, token) + + self.msg.delete.assert_called_once_with() + self.msg.channel.send.assert_not_awaited() + + +class TokenRemoverExtensionTests(unittest.TestCase): + """Tests for the token_remover extension.""" + + @autospec("bot.exts.filters.token_remover", "TokenRemover") + def test_extension_setup(self, cog): + """The TokenRemover cog should be added.""" + bot = MockBot() + token_remover.setup(bot) + + cog.assert_called_once_with(bot) + bot.add_cog.assert_called_once() + self.assertTrue(isinstance(bot.add_cog.call_args.args[0], TokenRemover)) diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/info/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/info/__init__.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e69de29bb --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/info/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_information.py b/tests/bot/exts/info/test_information.py index a3f80b1e5..36a35c8e2 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_information.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/info/test_information.py @@ -5,12 +5,11 @@ import unittest.mock import discord from bot import constants -from bot.cogs import information -from bot.decorators import InChannelCheckFailure +from bot.exts.info import information +from bot.utils.checks import InWhitelistCheckFailure from tests import helpers - -COG_PATH = "bot.cogs.information.Information" +COG_PATH = "bot.exts.info.information.Information" class InformationCogTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ class InformationCogTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual(admin_embed.title, "Admins info") self.assertEqual(admin_embed.colour, discord.Colour.red()) - @unittest.mock.patch('bot.cogs.information.time_since') + @unittest.mock.patch('bot.exts.info.information.time_since') async def test_server_info_command(self, time_since_patch): time_since_patch.return_value = '2 days ago' @@ -143,14 +142,18 @@ class InformationCogTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): Voice region: {self.ctx.guild.region} Features: {', '.join(self.ctx.guild.features)} - **Counts** - Members: {self.ctx.guild.member_count:,} - Roles: {len(self.ctx.guild.roles)} + **Channel counts** Category channels: 1 Text channels: 1 Voice channels: 1 + Staff channels: 0 - **Members** + **Member counts** + Members: {self.ctx.guild.member_count:,} + Staff members: 0 + Roles: {len(self.ctx.guild.roles)} + + **Member statuses** {constants.Emojis.status_online} 2 {constants.Emojis.status_idle} 1 {constants.Emojis.status_dnd} 4 @@ -206,10 +209,10 @@ class UserInfractionHelperMethodTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): with self.subTest(method=method, api_response=api_response, expected_lines=expected_lines): self.bot.api_client.get.return_value = api_response - expected_output = "\n".join(default_header + expected_lines) + expected_output = "\n".join(expected_lines) actual_output = await method(self.member) - self.assertEqual(expected_output, actual_output) + self.assertEqual((default_header, expected_output), actual_output) async def test_basic_user_infraction_counts_returns_correct_strings(self): """The method should correctly list both the total and active number of non-hidden infractions.""" @@ -240,7 +243,7 @@ class UserInfractionHelperMethodTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): }, ) - header = ["**Infractions**"] + header = "Infractions" await self._method_subtests(self.cog.basic_user_infraction_counts, test_values, header) @@ -249,7 +252,7 @@ class UserInfractionHelperMethodTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): test_values = ( { "api response": [], - "expected_lines": ["This user has never received an infraction."], + "expected_lines": ["No infractions"], }, # Shows non-hidden inactive infraction as expected { @@ -295,7 +298,7 @@ class UserInfractionHelperMethodTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): }, ) - header = ["**Infractions**"] + header = "Infractions" await self._method_subtests(self.cog.expanded_user_infraction_counts, test_values, header) @@ -304,15 +307,15 @@ class UserInfractionHelperMethodTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): test_values = ( { "api response": [], - "expected_lines": ["This user has never been nominated."], + "expected_lines": ["No nominations"], }, { "api response": [{'active': True}], - "expected_lines": ["This user is **currently** nominated (1 nomination in total)."], + "expected_lines": ["This user is **currently** nominated", "(1 nomination in total)"], }, { "api response": [{'active': True}, {'active': False}], - "expected_lines": ["This user is **currently** nominated (2 nominations in total)."], + "expected_lines": ["This user is **currently** nominated", "(2 nominations in total)"], }, { "api response": [{'active': False}], @@ -325,13 +328,13 @@ class UserInfractionHelperMethodTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): ) - header = ["**Nominations**"] + header = "Nominations" await self._method_subtests(self.cog.user_nomination_counts, test_values, header) [email protected]("bot.cogs.information.time_since", new=unittest.mock.MagicMock(return_value="1 year ago")) [email protected]("bot.cogs.information.constants.MODERATION_CHANNELS", new=[50]) [email protected]("bot.exts.info.information.time_since", new=unittest.mock.MagicMock(return_value="1 year ago")) [email protected]("bot.exts.info.information.constants.MODERATION_CHANNELS", new=[50]) class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): """Tests for the creation of the `!user` embed.""" @@ -341,7 +344,10 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.bot.api_client.get = unittest.mock.AsyncMock() self.cog = information.Information(self.bot) - @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value="")) + @unittest.mock.patch( + f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", + new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value=("Infractions", "basic infractions")) + ) async def test_create_user_embed_uses_string_representation_of_user_in_title_if_nick_is_not_available(self): """The embed should use the string representation of the user if they don't have a nick.""" ctx = helpers.MockContext(channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=1)) @@ -353,7 +359,10 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual(embed.title, "Mr. Hemlock") - @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value="")) + @unittest.mock.patch( + f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", + new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value=("Infractions", "basic infractions")) + ) async def test_create_user_embed_uses_nick_in_title_if_available(self): """The embed should use the nick if it's available.""" ctx = helpers.MockContext(channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=1)) @@ -365,7 +374,10 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual(embed.title, "Cat lover (Mr. Hemlock)") - @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value="")) + @unittest.mock.patch( + f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", + new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value=("Infractions", "basic infractions")) + ) async def test_create_user_embed_ignores_everyone_role(self): """Created `!user` embeds should not contain mention of the @everyone-role.""" ctx = helpers.MockContext(channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=1)) @@ -377,8 +389,8 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): embed = await self.cog.create_user_embed(ctx, user) - self.assertIn("&Admins", embed.description) - self.assertNotIn("&Everyone", embed.description) + self.assertIn("&Admins", embed.fields[1].value) + self.assertNotIn("&Everyone", embed.fields[1].value) @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.expanded_user_infraction_counts", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.user_nomination_counts", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) @@ -393,8 +405,8 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): moderators_role = helpers.MockRole(name='Moderators') moderators_role.colour = 100 - infraction_counts.return_value = "expanded infractions info" - nomination_counts.return_value = "nomination info" + infraction_counts.return_value = ("Infractions", "expanded infractions info") + nomination_counts.return_value = ("Nominations", "nomination info") user = helpers.MockMember(id=314, roles=[moderators_role], top_role=moderators_role) embed = await self.cog.create_user_embed(ctx, user) @@ -404,20 +416,19 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual( textwrap.dedent(f""" - **User Information** Created: {"1 year ago"} Profile: {user.mention} ID: {user.id} + """).strip(), + embed.fields[0].value + ) - **Member Information** + self.assertEqual( + textwrap.dedent(f""" Joined: {"1 year ago"} Roles: &Moderators - - expanded infractions info - - nomination info """).strip(), - embed.description + embed.fields[1].value ) @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) @@ -428,7 +439,7 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): moderators_role = helpers.MockRole(name='Moderators') moderators_role.colour = 100 - infraction_counts.return_value = "basic infractions info" + infraction_counts.return_value = ("Infractions", "basic infractions info") user = helpers.MockMember(id=314, roles=[moderators_role], top_role=moderators_role) embed = await self.cog.create_user_embed(ctx, user) @@ -437,21 +448,30 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual( textwrap.dedent(f""" - **User Information** Created: {"1 year ago"} Profile: {user.mention} ID: {user.id} + """).strip(), + embed.fields[0].value + ) - **Member Information** + self.assertEqual( + textwrap.dedent(f""" Joined: {"1 year ago"} Roles: &Moderators - - basic infractions info """).strip(), - embed.description + embed.fields[1].value ) - @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value="")) + self.assertEqual( + "basic infractions info", + embed.fields[3].value + ) + + @unittest.mock.patch( + f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", + new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value=("Infractions", "basic infractions")) + ) async def test_create_user_embed_uses_top_role_colour_when_user_has_roles(self): """The embed should be created with the colour of the top role, if a top role is available.""" ctx = helpers.MockContext() @@ -464,7 +484,10 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual(embed.colour, discord.Colour(moderators_role.colour)) - @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value="")) + @unittest.mock.patch( + f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", + new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value=("Infractions", "basic infractions")) + ) async def test_create_user_embed_uses_blurple_colour_when_user_has_no_roles(self): """The embed should be created with a blurple colour if the user has no assigned roles.""" ctx = helpers.MockContext() @@ -474,7 +497,10 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual(embed.colour, discord.Colour.blurple()) - @unittest.mock.patch(f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value="")) + @unittest.mock.patch( + f"{COG_PATH}.basic_user_infraction_counts", + new=unittest.mock.AsyncMock(return_value=("Infractions", "basic infractions")) + ) async def test_create_user_embed_uses_png_format_of_user_avatar_as_thumbnail(self): """The embed thumbnail should be set to the user's avatar in `png` format.""" ctx = helpers.MockContext() @@ -483,11 +509,11 @@ class UserEmbedTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): user.avatar_url_as.return_value = "avatar url" embed = await self.cog.create_user_embed(ctx, user) - user.avatar_url_as.assert_called_once_with(format="png") + user.avatar_url_as.assert_called_once_with(static_format="png") self.assertEqual(embed.thumbnail.url, "avatar url") [email protected]("bot.cogs.information.constants") [email protected]("bot.exts.info.information.constants") class UserCommandTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): """Tests for the `!user` command.""" @@ -504,10 +530,13 @@ class UserCommandTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.moderator = helpers.MockMember(id=2, name="riffautae", roles=[self.moderator_role]) self.target = helpers.MockMember(id=3, name="__fluzz__") + # There's no way to mock the channel constant without deferring imports. The constant is + # used as a default value for a parameter, which gets defined upon import. + self.bot_command_channel = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=constants.Channels.bot_commands) + async def test_regular_member_cannot_target_another_member(self, constants): """A regular user should not be able to use `!user` targeting another user.""" constants.MODERATION_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] - ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.author) await self.cog.user_info(self.cog, ctx, self.target) @@ -518,46 +547,38 @@ class UserCommandTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): """A regular user should not be able to use this command outside of bot-commands.""" constants.MODERATION_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] constants.STAFF_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] - constants.Channels.bot_commands = 50 - ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.author, channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=100)) msg = "Sorry, but you may only use this command within <#50>." - with self.assertRaises(InChannelCheckFailure, msg=msg): + with self.assertRaises(InWhitelistCheckFailure, msg=msg): await self.cog.user_info(self.cog, ctx) - @unittest.mock.patch("bot.cogs.information.Information.create_user_embed", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) + @unittest.mock.patch("bot.exts.info.information.Information.create_user_embed") async def test_regular_user_may_use_command_in_bot_commands_channel(self, create_embed, constants): """A regular user should be allowed to use `!user` targeting themselves in bot-commands.""" constants.STAFF_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] - constants.Channels.bot_commands = 50 - - ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.author, channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=50)) + ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.author, channel=self.bot_command_channel) await self.cog.user_info(self.cog, ctx) create_embed.assert_called_once_with(ctx, self.author) ctx.send.assert_called_once() - @unittest.mock.patch("bot.cogs.information.Information.create_user_embed", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) - async def test_regular_user_can_explicitly_target_themselves(self, create_embed, constants): + @unittest.mock.patch("bot.exts.info.information.Information.create_user_embed") + async def test_regular_user_can_explicitly_target_themselves(self, create_embed, _): """A user should target itself with `!user` when a `user` argument was not provided.""" constants.STAFF_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] - constants.Channels.bot_commands = 50 - - ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.author, channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=50)) + ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.author, channel=self.bot_command_channel) await self.cog.user_info(self.cog, ctx, self.author) create_embed.assert_called_once_with(ctx, self.author) ctx.send.assert_called_once() - @unittest.mock.patch("bot.cogs.information.Information.create_user_embed", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) + @unittest.mock.patch("bot.exts.info.information.Information.create_user_embed") async def test_staff_members_can_bypass_channel_restriction(self, create_embed, constants): """Staff members should be able to bypass the bot-commands channel restriction.""" constants.STAFF_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] - constants.Channels.bot_commands = 50 - ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.moderator, channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=200)) await self.cog.user_info(self.cog, ctx) @@ -565,12 +586,11 @@ class UserCommandTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): create_embed.assert_called_once_with(ctx, self.moderator) ctx.send.assert_called_once() - @unittest.mock.patch("bot.cogs.information.Information.create_user_embed", new_callable=unittest.mock.AsyncMock) + @unittest.mock.patch("bot.exts.info.information.Information.create_user_embed") async def test_moderators_can_target_another_member(self, create_embed, constants): """A moderator should be able to use `!user` targeting another user.""" constants.MODERATION_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] constants.STAFF_ROLES = [self.moderator_role.id] - ctx = helpers.MockContext(author=self.moderator, channel=helpers.MockTextChannel(id=50)) await self.cog.user_info(self.cog, ctx, self.target) diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/__init__.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e69de29bb --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/__init__.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e69de29bb --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/test_infractions.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/test_infractions.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..be1b649e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/test_infractions.py @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +import textwrap +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, Mock, patch + +from bot.exts.moderation.infraction.infractions import Infractions +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext, MockGuild, MockMember, MockRole + + +class TruncationTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests for ban and kick command reason truncation.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = MockBot() + self.cog = Infractions(self.bot) + self.user = MockMember(id=1234, top_role=MockRole(id=3577, position=10)) + self.target = MockMember(id=1265, top_role=MockRole(id=9876, position=0)) + self.guild = MockGuild(id=4567) + self.ctx = MockContext(bot=self.bot, author=self.user, guild=self.guild) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.get_active_infraction") + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.post_infraction") + async def test_apply_ban_reason_truncation(self, post_infraction_mock, get_active_mock): + """Should truncate reason for `ctx.guild.ban`.""" + get_active_mock.return_value = None + post_infraction_mock.return_value = {"foo": "bar"} + + self.cog.apply_infraction = AsyncMock() + self.bot.get_cog.return_value = AsyncMock() + self.cog.mod_log.ignore = Mock() + self.ctx.guild.ban = Mock() + + await self.cog.apply_ban(self.ctx, self.target, "foo bar" * 3000) + self.ctx.guild.ban.assert_called_once_with( + self.target, + reason=textwrap.shorten("foo bar" * 3000, 512, placeholder="..."), + delete_message_days=0 + ) + self.cog.apply_infraction.assert_awaited_once_with( + self.ctx, {"foo": "bar"}, self.target, self.ctx.guild.ban.return_value + ) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.post_infraction") + async def test_apply_kick_reason_truncation(self, post_infraction_mock): + """Should truncate reason for `Member.kick`.""" + post_infraction_mock.return_value = {"foo": "bar"} + + self.cog.apply_infraction = AsyncMock() + self.cog.mod_log.ignore = Mock() + self.target.kick = Mock() + + await self.cog.apply_kick(self.ctx, self.target, "foo bar" * 3000) + self.target.kick.assert_called_once_with(reason=textwrap.shorten("foo bar" * 3000, 512, placeholder="...")) + self.cog.apply_infraction.assert_awaited_once_with( + self.ctx, {"foo": "bar"}, self.target, self.target.kick.return_value + ) diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/test_utils.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/test_utils.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5b62463e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/infraction/test_utils.py @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ +import unittest +from collections import namedtuple +from datetime import datetime +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, call, patch + +from discord import Embed, Forbidden, HTTPException, NotFound + +from bot.api import ResponseCodeError +from bot.constants import Colours, Icons +from bot.exts.moderation.infraction import _utils as utils +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext, MockMember, MockUser + + +class ModerationUtilsTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests Moderation utils.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = MockBot() + self.member = MockMember(id=1234) + self.user = MockUser(id=1234) + self.ctx = MockContext(bot=self.bot, author=self.member) + + async def test_post_user(self): + """Should POST a new user and return the response if successful or otherwise send an error message.""" + user = MockUser(discriminator=5678, id=1234, name="Test user") + not_user = MagicMock(discriminator=3333, id=5678, name="Wrong user") + test_cases = [ + { + "user": user, + "post_result": "bar", + "raise_error": None, + "payload": { + "discriminator": 5678, + "id": self.user.id, + "in_guild": False, + "name": "Test user", + "roles": [] + } + }, + { + "user": self.member, + "post_result": "foo", + "raise_error": ResponseCodeError(MagicMock(status=400), "foo"), + "payload": { + "discriminator": 0, + "id": self.member.id, + "in_guild": False, + "name": "Name unknown", + "roles": [] + } + }, + { + "user": not_user, + "post_result": "bar", + "raise_error": None, + "payload": { + "discriminator": not_user.discriminator, + "id": not_user.id, + "in_guild": False, + "name": not_user.name, + "roles": [] + } + } + ] + + for case in test_cases: + user = case["user"] + post_result = case["post_result"] + raise_error = case["raise_error"] + payload = case["payload"] + + with self.subTest(user=user, post_result=post_result, raise_error=raise_error, payload=payload): + self.bot.api_client.post.reset_mock(side_effect=True) + self.ctx.bot.api_client.post.return_value = post_result + + self.ctx.bot.api_client.post.side_effect = raise_error + + result = await utils.post_user(self.ctx, user) + + if raise_error: + self.assertIsNone(result) + self.ctx.send.assert_awaited_once() + self.assertIn(str(raise_error.status), self.ctx.send.call_args[0][0]) + else: + self.assertEqual(result, post_result) + self.bot.api_client.post.assert_awaited_once_with("bot/users", json=payload) + + async def test_get_active_infraction(self): + """ + Should request the API for active infractions and return infraction if the user has one or `None` otherwise. + + A message should be sent to the context indicating a user already has an infraction, if that's the case. + """ + test_case = namedtuple("test_case", ["get_return_value", "expected_output", "infraction_nr", "send_msg"]) + test_cases = [ + test_case([], None, None, True), + test_case([{"id": 123987}], {"id": 123987}, "123987", False), + test_case([{"id": 123987}], {"id": 123987}, "123987", True) + ] + + for case in test_cases: + with self.subTest(return_value=case.get_return_value, expected=case.expected_output): + self.bot.api_client.get.reset_mock() + self.ctx.send.reset_mock() + + params = { + "active": "true", + "type": "ban", + "user__id": str(self.member.id) + } + + self.bot.api_client.get.return_value = case.get_return_value + + result = await utils.get_active_infraction(self.ctx, self.member, "ban", send_msg=case.send_msg) + self.assertEqual(result, case.expected_output) + self.bot.api_client.get.assert_awaited_once_with("bot/infractions", params=params) + + if case.send_msg and case.get_return_value: + self.ctx.send.assert_awaited_once() + sent_message = self.ctx.send.call_args[0][0] + self.assertIn(case.infraction_nr, sent_message) + self.assertIn("ban", sent_message) + else: + self.ctx.send.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.send_private_embed") + async def test_notify_infraction(self, send_private_embed_mock): + """ + Should send an embed of a certain format as a DM and return `True` if DM successful. + + Appealable infractions should have the appeal message in the embed's footer. + """ + test_cases = [ + { + "args": (self.user, "ban", "2020-02-26 09:20 (23 hours and 59 minutes)"), + "expected_output": Embed( + title=utils.INFRACTION_TITLE, + description=utils.INFRACTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE.format( + type="Ban", + expires="2020-02-26 09:20 (23 hours and 59 minutes)", + reason="No reason provided." + ), + colour=Colours.soft_red, + url=utils.RULES_URL + ).set_author( + name=utils.INFRACTION_AUTHOR_NAME, + url=utils.RULES_URL, + icon_url=Icons.token_removed + ).set_footer(text=utils.INFRACTION_APPEAL_FOOTER), + "send_result": True + }, + { + "args": (self.user, "warning", None, "Test reason."), + "expected_output": Embed( + title=utils.INFRACTION_TITLE, + description=utils.INFRACTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE.format( + type="Warning", + expires="N/A", + reason="Test reason." + ), + colour=Colours.soft_red, + url=utils.RULES_URL + ).set_author( + name=utils.INFRACTION_AUTHOR_NAME, + url=utils.RULES_URL, + icon_url=Icons.token_removed + ), + "send_result": False + }, + { + "args": (self.user, "note", None, None, Icons.defcon_denied), + "expected_output": Embed( + title=utils.INFRACTION_TITLE, + description=utils.INFRACTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE.format( + type="Note", + expires="N/A", + reason="No reason provided." + ), + colour=Colours.soft_red, + url=utils.RULES_URL + ).set_author( + name=utils.INFRACTION_AUTHOR_NAME, + url=utils.RULES_URL, + icon_url=Icons.defcon_denied + ), + "send_result": False + }, + { + "args": (self.user, "mute", "2020-02-26 09:20 (23 hours and 59 minutes)", "Test", Icons.defcon_denied), + "expected_output": Embed( + title=utils.INFRACTION_TITLE, + description=utils.INFRACTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE.format( + type="Mute", + expires="2020-02-26 09:20 (23 hours and 59 minutes)", + reason="Test" + ), + colour=Colours.soft_red, + url=utils.RULES_URL + ).set_author( + name=utils.INFRACTION_AUTHOR_NAME, + url=utils.RULES_URL, + icon_url=Icons.defcon_denied + ).set_footer(text=utils.INFRACTION_APPEAL_FOOTER), + "send_result": False + }, + { + "args": (self.user, "mute", None, "foo bar" * 4000, Icons.defcon_denied), + "expected_output": Embed( + title=utils.INFRACTION_TITLE, + description=utils.INFRACTION_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE.format( + type="Mute", + expires="N/A", + reason="foo bar" * 4000 + )[:2045] + "...", + colour=Colours.soft_red, + url=utils.RULES_URL + ).set_author( + name=utils.INFRACTION_AUTHOR_NAME, + url=utils.RULES_URL, + icon_url=Icons.defcon_denied + ).set_footer(text=utils.INFRACTION_APPEAL_FOOTER), + "send_result": True + } + ] + + for case in test_cases: + with self.subTest(args=case["args"], expected=case["expected_output"], send=case["send_result"]): + send_private_embed_mock.reset_mock() + + send_private_embed_mock.return_value = case["send_result"] + result = await utils.notify_infraction(*case["args"]) + + self.assertEqual(case["send_result"], result) + + embed = send_private_embed_mock.call_args[0][1] + + self.assertEqual(embed.to_dict(), case["expected_output"].to_dict()) + + send_private_embed_mock.assert_awaited_once_with(case["args"][0], embed) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.send_private_embed") + async def test_notify_pardon(self, send_private_embed_mock): + """Should send an embed of a certain format as a DM and return `True` if DM successful.""" + test_case = namedtuple("test_case", ["args", "icon", "send_result"]) + test_cases = [ + test_case((self.user, "Test title", "Example content"), Icons.user_verified, True), + test_case((self.user, "Test title", "Example content", Icons.user_update), Icons.user_update, False) + ] + + for case in test_cases: + expected = Embed( + description="Example content", + colour=Colours.soft_green + ).set_author( + name="Test title", + icon_url=case.icon + ) + + with self.subTest(args=case.args, expected=expected): + send_private_embed_mock.reset_mock() + + send_private_embed_mock.return_value = case.send_result + + result = await utils.notify_pardon(*case.args) + self.assertEqual(case.send_result, result) + + embed = send_private_embed_mock.call_args[0][1] + self.assertEqual(embed.to_dict(), expected.to_dict()) + + send_private_embed_mock.assert_awaited_once_with(case.args[0], embed) + + async def test_send_private_embed(self): + """Should DM the user and return `True` on success or `False` on failure.""" + embed = Embed(title="Test", description="Test val") + + test_case = namedtuple("test_case", ["expected_output", "raised_exception"]) + test_cases = [ + test_case(True, None), + test_case(False, HTTPException(AsyncMock(), AsyncMock())), + test_case(False, Forbidden(AsyncMock(), AsyncMock())), + test_case(False, NotFound(AsyncMock(), AsyncMock())) + ] + + for case in test_cases: + with self.subTest(expected=case.expected_output, raised=case.raised_exception): + self.user.send.reset_mock(side_effect=True) + self.user.send.side_effect = case.raised_exception + + result = await utils.send_private_embed(self.user, embed) + + self.assertEqual(result, case.expected_output) + self.user.send.assert_awaited_once_with(embed=embed) + + +class TestPostInfraction(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests for the `post_infraction` function.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = MockBot() + self.member = MockMember(id=1234) + self.user = MockUser(id=1234) + self.ctx = MockContext(bot=self.bot, author=self.member) + + async def test_normal_post_infraction(self): + """Should return response from POST request if there are no errors.""" + now = datetime.now() + payload = { + "actor": self.ctx.author.id, + "hidden": True, + "reason": "Test reason", + "type": "ban", + "user": self.member.id, + "active": False, + "expires_at": now.isoformat() + } + + self.ctx.bot.api_client.post.return_value = "foo" + actual = await utils.post_infraction(self.ctx, self.member, "ban", "Test reason", now, True, False) + + self.assertEqual(actual, "foo") + self.ctx.bot.api_client.post.assert_awaited_once_with("bot/infractions", json=payload) + + async def test_unknown_error_post_infraction(self): + """Should send an error message to chat when a non-400 error occurs.""" + self.ctx.bot.api_client.post.side_effect = ResponseCodeError(AsyncMock(), AsyncMock()) + self.ctx.bot.api_client.post.side_effect.status = 500 + + actual = await utils.post_infraction(self.ctx, self.user, "ban", "Test reason") + self.assertIsNone(actual) + + self.assertTrue("500" in self.ctx.send.call_args[0][0]) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.post_user", return_value=None) + async def test_user_not_found_none_post_infraction(self, post_user_mock): + """Should abort and return `None` when a new user fails to be posted.""" + self.bot.api_client.post.side_effect = ResponseCodeError(MagicMock(status=400), {"user": "foo"}) + + actual = await utils.post_infraction(self.ctx, self.user, "mute", "Test reason") + self.assertIsNone(actual) + post_user_mock.assert_awaited_once_with(self.ctx, self.user) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.infraction._utils.post_user", return_value="bar") + async def test_first_fail_second_success_user_post_infraction(self, post_user_mock): + """Should post the user if they don't exist, POST infraction again, and return the response if successful.""" + payload = { + "actor": self.ctx.author.id, + "hidden": False, + "reason": "Test reason", + "type": "mute", + "user": self.user.id, + "active": True + } + + self.bot.api_client.post.side_effect = [ResponseCodeError(MagicMock(status=400), {"user": "foo"}), "foo"] + + actual = await utils.post_infraction(self.ctx, self.user, "mute", "Test reason") + self.assertEqual(actual, "foo") + self.bot.api_client.post.assert_has_awaits([call("bot/infractions", json=payload)] * 2) + post_user_mock.assert_awaited_once_with(self.ctx, self.user) diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cbf7f7bcf --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_incidents.py @@ -0,0 +1,770 @@ +import asyncio +import enum +import logging +import typing as t +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, call, patch + +import aiohttp +import discord + +from bot.constants import Colours +from bot.exts.moderation import incidents +from tests.helpers import ( + MockAsyncWebhook, + MockAttachment, + MockBot, + MockMember, + MockMessage, + MockReaction, + MockRole, + MockTextChannel, + MockUser, +) + + +class MockAsyncIterable: + """ + Helper for mocking asynchronous for loops. + + It does not appear that the `unittest` library currently provides anything that would + allow us to simply mock an async iterator, such as `discord.TextChannel.history`. + + We therefore write our own helper to wrap a regular synchronous iterable, and feed + its values via `__anext__` rather than `__next__`. + + This class was written for the purposes of testing the `Incidents` cog - it may not + be generic enough to be placed in the `tests.helpers` module. + """ + + def __init__(self, messages: t.Iterable): + """Take a sync iterable to be wrapped.""" + self.iter_messages = iter(messages) + + def __aiter__(self): + """Return `self` as we provide the `__anext__` method.""" + return self + + async def __anext__(self): + """ + Feed the next item, or raise `StopAsyncIteration`. + + Since we're wrapping a sync iterator, it will communicate that it has been depleted + by raising a `StopIteration`. The `async for` construct does not expect it, and we + therefore need to substitute it for the appropriate exception type. + """ + try: + return next(self.iter_messages) + except StopIteration: + raise StopAsyncIteration + + +class MockSignal(enum.Enum): + A = "A" + B = "B" + + +mock_404 = discord.NotFound( + response=MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), # Mock the erroneous response + message="Not found", +) + + +class TestDownloadFile(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Collection of tests for the `download_file` helper function.""" + + async def test_download_file_success(self): + """If `to_file` succeeds, function returns the acquired `discord.File`.""" + file = MagicMock(discord.File, filename="bigbadlemon.jpg") + attachment = MockAttachment(to_file=AsyncMock(return_value=file)) + + acquired_file = await incidents.download_file(attachment) + self.assertIs(file, acquired_file) + + async def test_download_file_404(self): + """If `to_file` encounters a 404, function handles the exception & returns None.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(to_file=AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404)) + + acquired_file = await incidents.download_file(attachment) + self.assertIsNone(acquired_file) + + async def test_download_file_fail(self): + """If `to_file` fails on a non-404 error, function logs the exception & returns None.""" + arbitrary_error = discord.HTTPException(MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), "Arbitrary API error") + attachment = MockAttachment(to_file=AsyncMock(side_effect=arbitrary_error)) + + with self.assertLogs(logger=incidents.log, level=logging.ERROR): + acquired_file = await incidents.download_file(attachment) + + self.assertIsNone(acquired_file) + + +class TestMakeEmbed(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Collection of tests for the `make_embed` helper function.""" + + async def test_make_embed_actioned(self): + """Embed is coloured green and footer contains 'Actioned' when `outcome=Signal.ACTIONED`.""" + embed, file = await incidents.make_embed(MockMessage(), incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(embed.colour.value, Colours.soft_green) + self.assertIn("Actioned", embed.footer.text) + + async def test_make_embed_not_actioned(self): + """Embed is coloured red and footer contains 'Rejected' when `outcome=Signal.NOT_ACTIONED`.""" + embed, file = await incidents.make_embed(MockMessage(), incidents.Signal.NOT_ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(embed.colour.value, Colours.soft_red) + self.assertIn("Rejected", embed.footer.text) + + async def test_make_embed_content(self): + """Incident content appears as embed description.""" + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident") + embed, file = await incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(incident.content, embed.description) + + async def test_make_embed_with_attachment_succeeds(self): + """Incident's attachment is downloaded and displayed in the embed's image field.""" + file = MagicMock(discord.File, filename="bigbadjoe.jpg") + attachment = MockAttachment(filename="bigbadjoe.jpg") + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident", attachments=[attachment]) + + # Patch `download_file` to return our `file` + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.download_file", AsyncMock(return_value=file)): + embed, returned_file = await incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertIs(file, returned_file) + self.assertEqual("attachment://bigbadjoe.jpg", embed.image.url) + + async def test_make_embed_with_attachment_fails(self): + """Incident's attachment fails to download, proxy url is linked instead.""" + attachment = MockAttachment(proxy_url="discord.com/bigbadjoe.jpg") + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident", attachments=[attachment]) + + # Patch `download_file` to return None as if the download failed + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.download_file", AsyncMock(return_value=None)): + embed, returned_file = await incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertIsNone(returned_file) + + # The author name field is simply expected to have something in it, we do not assert the message + self.assertGreater(len(embed.author.name), 0) + self.assertEqual(embed.author.url, "discord.com/bigbadjoe.jpg") # However, it should link the exact url + + +@patch("bot.constants.Channels.incidents", 123) +class TestIsIncident(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Collection of tests for the `is_incident` helper function. + + In `setUp`, we will create a mock message which should qualify as an incident. Each + test case will then mutate this instance to make it **not** qualify, in various ways. + + Notice that we patch the #incidents channel id globally for this class. + """ + + def setUp(self) -> None: + """Prepare a mock message which should qualify as an incident.""" + self.incident = MockMessage( + channel=MockTextChannel(id=123), + content="this is an incident", + author=MockUser(bot=False), + pinned=False, + ) + + def test_is_incident_true(self): + """Message qualifies as an incident if unchanged.""" + self.assertTrue(incidents.is_incident(self.incident)) + + def check_false(self): + """Assert that `self.incident` does **not** qualify as an incident.""" + self.assertFalse(incidents.is_incident(self.incident)) + + def test_is_incident_false_channel(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if sent outside of #incidents.""" + self.incident.channel = MockTextChannel(id=456) + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_content(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if content begins with hash symbol.""" + self.incident.content = "# this is a comment message" + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_author(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if author is a bot.""" + self.incident.author = MockUser(bot=True) + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_pinned(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if it is pinned.""" + self.incident.pinned = True + self.check_false() + + +class TestOwnReactions(unittest.TestCase): + """Assertions for the `own_reactions` function.""" + + def test_own_reactions(self): + """Only bot's own emoji are extracted from the input incident.""" + reactions = ( + MockReaction(emoji="A", me=True), + MockReaction(emoji="B", me=True), + MockReaction(emoji="C", me=False), + ) + message = MockMessage(reactions=reactions) + self.assertSetEqual(incidents.own_reactions(message), {"A", "B"}) + + +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.ALL_SIGNALS", {"A", "B"}) +class TestHasSignals(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Assertions for the `has_signals` function. + + We patch `ALL_SIGNALS` globally. Each test function then patches `own_reactions` + as appropriate. + """ + + def test_has_signals_true(self): + """True when `own_reactions` returns all emoji in `ALL_SIGNALS`.""" + message = MockMessage() + own_reactions = MagicMock(return_value={"A", "B"}) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", own_reactions): + self.assertTrue(incidents.has_signals(message)) + + def test_has_signals_false(self): + """False when `own_reactions` does not return all emoji in `ALL_SIGNALS`.""" + message = MockMessage() + own_reactions = MagicMock(return_value={"A", "C"}) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", own_reactions): + self.assertFalse(incidents.has_signals(message)) + + +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Signal", MockSignal) +class TestAddSignals(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """ + Assertions for the `add_signals` coroutine. + + These are all fairly similar and could go into a single test function, but I found the + patching & sub-testing fairly awkward in that case and decided to split them up + to avoid unnecessary syntax noise. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """Prepare a mock incident message for tests to use.""" + self.incident = MockMessage() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value=set())) + async def test_add_signals_missing(self): + """All emoji are added when none are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_has_calls([call("A"), call("B")]) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value={"A"})) + async def test_add_signals_partial(self): + """Only missing emoji are added when some are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_has_calls([call("B")]) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value={"A", "B"})) + async def test_add_signals_present(self): + """No emoji are added when all are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_not_called() + + +class TestIncidents(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """ + Tests for bound methods of the `Incidents` cog. + + Use this as a base class for `Incidents` tests - it will prepare a fresh instance + for each test function, but not make any assertions on its own. Tests can mutate + the instance as they wish. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """ + Prepare a fresh `Incidents` instance for each test. + + Note that this will not schedule `crawl_incidents` in the background, as everything + is being mocked. The `crawl_task` attribute will end up being None. + """ + self.cog_instance = incidents.Incidents(MockBot()) + + +@patch("asyncio.sleep", AsyncMock()) # Prevent the coro from sleeping to speed up the test +class TestCrawlIncidents(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.crawl_incidents` coroutine. + + Apart from `test_crawl_incidents_waits_until_cache_ready`, all tests in this class + will patch the return values of `is_incident` and `has_signal` and then observe + whether the `AsyncMock` for `add_signals` was awaited or not. + + The `add_signals` mock is added by each test separately to ensure it is clean (has not + been awaited by another test yet). The mock can be reset, but this appears to be the + cleaner way. + + For each test, we inject a mock channel with a history of 1 message only (see: `setUp`). + """ + + def setUp(self): + """For each test, ensure `bot.get_channel` returns a channel with 1 arbitrary message.""" + super().setUp() # First ensure we get `cog_instance` from parent + + incidents_history = MagicMock(return_value=MockAsyncIterable([MockMessage()])) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(history=incidents_history)) + + async def test_crawl_incidents_waits_until_cache_ready(self): + """ + The coroutine will await the `wait_until_guild_available` event. + + Since this task is schedule in the `__init__`, it is critical that it waits for the + cache to be ready, so that it can safely get the #incidents channel. + """ + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + self.cog_instance.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)) # Message doesn't qualify + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=False)) + async def test_crawl_incidents_noop_if_is_not_incident(self): + """Signals are not added for a non-incident message.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # Message qualifies + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # But already has signals + async def test_crawl_incidents_noop_if_message_already_has_signals(self): + """Signals are not added for messages which already have them.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # Message qualifies + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=False)) # And doesn't have signals + async def test_crawl_incidents_add_signals_called(self): + """Message has signals added as it does not have them yet and qualifies as an incident.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_awaited_once() + + +class TestArchive(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.archive` coroutine.""" + + async def test_archive_webhook_not_found(self): + """ + Method recovers and returns False when the webhook is not found. + + Implicitly, this also tests that the error is handled internally and doesn't + propagate out of the method, which is just as important. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404) + self.assertFalse( + await self.cog_instance.archive(incident=MockMessage(), outcome=MagicMock(), actioned_by=MockMember()) + ) + + async def test_archive_relays_incident(self): + """ + If webhook is found, method relays `incident` properly. + + This test will assert that the fetched webhook's `send` method is fed the correct arguments, + and that the `archive` method returns True. + """ + webhook = MockAsyncWebhook() + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(return_value=webhook) # Patch in our webhook + + # Define our own `incident` to be archived + incident = MockMessage( + content="this is an incident", + author=MockUser(name="author_name", avatar_url="author_avatar"), + id=123, + ) + built_embed = MagicMock(discord.Embed, id=123) # We patch `make_embed` to return this + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.make_embed", AsyncMock(return_value=(built_embed, None))): + archive_return = await self.cog_instance.archive(incident, MagicMock(value="A"), MockMember()) + + # Now we check that the webhook was given the correct args, and that `archive` returned True + webhook.send.assert_called_once_with( + embed=built_embed, + username="author_name", + avatar_url="author_avatar", + file=None, + ) + self.assertTrue(archive_return) + + async def test_archive_clyde_username(self): + """ + The archive webhook username is cleansed using `sub_clyde`. + + Discord will reject any webhook with "clyde" in the username field, as it impersonates + the official Clyde bot. Since we do not control what the username will be (the incident + author name is used), we must ensure the name is cleansed, otherwise the relay may fail. + + This test assumes the username is passed as a kwarg. If this test fails, please review + whether the passed argument is being retrieved correctly. + """ + webhook = MockAsyncWebhook() + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(return_value=webhook) + + message_from_clyde = MockMessage(author=MockUser(name="clyde the great")) + await self.cog_instance.archive(message_from_clyde, MagicMock(incidents.Signal), MockMember()) + + self.assertNotIn("clyde", webhook.send.call_args.kwargs["username"]) + + +class TestMakeConfirmationTask(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.make_confirmation_task` method. + + Writing tests for this method is difficult, as it mostly just delegates the provided + information elsewhere. There is very little internal logic. Whether our approach + works conceptually is difficult to prove using unit tests. + """ + + def test_make_confirmation_task_check(self): + """ + The internal check will recognize the passed incident. + + This is a little tricky - we first pass a message with a specific `id` in, and then + retrieve the built check from the `call_args` of the `wait_for` method. This relies + on the check being passed as a kwarg. + + Once the check is retrieved, we assert that it gives True for our incident's `id`, + and False for any other. + + If this function begins to fail, first check that `created_check` is being retrieved + correctly. It should be the function that is built locally in the tested method. + """ + self.cog_instance.make_confirmation_task(MockMessage(id=123)) + + self.cog_instance.bot.wait_for.assert_called_once() + created_check = self.cog_instance.bot.wait_for.call_args.kwargs["check"] + + # The `message_id` matches the `id` of our incident + self.assertTrue(created_check(payload=MagicMock(message_id=123))) + + # This `message_id` does not match + self.assertFalse(created_check(payload=MagicMock(message_id=0))) + + +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.ALLOWED_ROLES", {1, 2}) +@patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", AsyncMock()) # Generic awaitable +class TestProcessEvent(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.process_event` coroutine.""" + + async def test_process_event_bad_role(self): + """The reaction is removed when the author lacks all allowed roles.""" + incident = MockMessage() + member = MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=0)]) # Must have role 1 or 2 + + await self.cog_instance.process_event("reaction", incident, member) + incident.remove_reaction.assert_called_once_with("reaction", member) + + async def test_process_event_bad_emoji(self): + """ + The reaction is removed when an invalid emoji is used. + + This requires that we pass in a `member` with valid roles, as we need the role check + to succeed. + """ + incident = MockMessage() + member = MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) # Member has allowed role + + await self.cog_instance.process_event("invalid_signal", incident, member) + incident.remove_reaction.assert_called_once_with("invalid_signal", member) + + async def test_process_event_no_archive_on_investigating(self): + """Message is not archived on `Signal.INVESTIGATING`.""" + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.archive", AsyncMock()) as mocked_archive: + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.INVESTIGATING.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]), + ) + + mocked_archive.assert_not_called() + + async def test_process_event_no_delete_if_archive_fails(self): + """ + Original message is not deleted when `Incidents.archive` returns False. + + This is the way of signaling that the relay failed, and we should not remove the original, + as that would result in losing the incident record. + """ + incident = MockMessage() + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.archive", AsyncMock(return_value=False)): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=incident, + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + + incident.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_process_event_confirmation_task_is_awaited(self): + """Task given by `Incidents.make_confirmation_task` is awaited before method exits.""" + mock_task = AsyncMock() + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", mock_task): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + + mock_task.assert_awaited() + + async def test_process_event_confirmation_task_timeout_is_handled(self): + """ + Confirmation task `asyncio.TimeoutError` is handled gracefully. + + We have `make_confirmation_task` return a mock with a side effect, and then catch the + exception should it propagate out of `process_event`. This is so that we can then manually + fail the test with a more informative message than just the plain traceback. + """ + mock_task = AsyncMock(side_effect=asyncio.TimeoutError()) + + try: + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", mock_task): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + except asyncio.TimeoutError: + self.fail("TimeoutError was not handled gracefully, and propagated out of `process_event`!") + + +class TestResolveMessage(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.resolve_message` coroutine.""" + + async def test_resolve_message_pass_message_id(self): + """Method will call `_get_message` with the passed `message_id`.""" + await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message.assert_called_once_with(123) + + async def test_resolve_message_in_cache(self): + """ + No API call is made if the queried message exists in the cache. + + We mock the `_get_message` return value regardless of input. Whether it finds the message + internally is considered d.py's responsibility, not ours. + """ + cached_message = MockMessage(id=123) + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=cached_message) + + return_value = await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + + self.assertIs(return_value, cached_message) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel.assert_not_called() # The `fetch_message` line was never hit + + async def test_resolve_message_not_in_cache(self): + """ + The message is retrieved from the API if it isn't cached. + + This is desired behaviour for messages which exist, but were sent before the bot's + current session. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + # API returns our message + uncached_message = MockMessage() + fetch_message = AsyncMock(return_value=uncached_message) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + retrieved_message = await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + self.assertIs(retrieved_message, uncached_message) + + async def test_resolve_message_doesnt_exist(self): + """ + If the API returns a 404, the function handles it gracefully and returns None. + + This is an edge-case happening with racing events - event A will relay the message + to the archive and delete the original. Once event B acquires the `event_lock`, + it will not find the message in the cache, and will ask the API. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + fetch_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + self.assertIsNone(await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123)) + + async def test_resolve_message_fetch_fails(self): + """ + Non-404 errors are handled, logged & None is returned. + + In contrast with a 404, this should make an error-level log. We assert that at least + one such log was made - we do not make any assertions about the log's message. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + arbitrary_error = discord.HTTPException( + response=MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), + message="Arbitrary error", + ) + fetch_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=arbitrary_error) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + with self.assertLogs(logger=incidents.log, level=logging.ERROR): + self.assertIsNone(await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123)) + + +@patch("bot.constants.Channels.incidents", 123) +class TestOnRawReactionAdd(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.on_raw_reaction_add` listener. + + Writing tests for this listener comes with additional complexity due to the listener + awaiting the `crawl_task` task. See `asyncSetUp` for further details, which attempts + to make unit testing this function possible. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """ + Prepare & assign `payload` attribute. + + This attribute represents an *ideal* payload which will not be rejected by the + listener. As each test will receive a fresh instance, it can be mutated to + observe how the listener's behaviour changes with different attributes on + the passed payload. + """ + super().setUp() # Ensure `cog_instance` is assigned + + self.payload = MagicMock( + discord.RawReactionActionEvent, + channel_id=123, # Patched at class level + message_id=456, + member=MockMember(bot=False), + emoji="reaction", + ) + + async def asyncSetUp(self): # noqa: N802 + """ + Prepare an empty task and assign it as `crawl_task`. + + It appears that the `unittest` framework does not provide anything for mocking + asyncio tasks. An `AsyncMock` instance can be called and then awaited, however, + it does not provide the `done` method or any other parts of the `asyncio.Task` + interface. + + Although we do not need to make any assertions about the task itself while + testing the listener, the code will still await it and call the `done` method, + and so we must inject something that will not fail on either action. + + Note that this is done in an `asyncSetUp`, which runs after `setUp`. + The justification is that creating an actual task requires the event + loop to be ready, which is not the case in the `setUp`. + """ + mock_task = asyncio.create_task(AsyncMock()()) # Mock async func, then a coro + self.cog_instance.crawl_task = mock_task + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_wrong_channel(self): + """ + Events outside of #incidents will be ignored. + + We check this by asserting that `resolve_message` was never queried. + """ + self.payload.channel_id = 0 + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_user_is_bot(self): + """ + Events dispatched by bot accounts will be ignored. + + We check this by asserting that `resolve_message` was never queried. + """ + self.payload.member = MockMember(bot=True) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_message_doesnt_exist(self): + """ + Listener gracefully handles the case where `resolve_message` gives None. + + We check this by asserting that `process_event` was never called. + """ + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=None) + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_message_is_not_an_incident(self): + """ + The event won't be processed if the related message is not an incident. + + This is an edge-case that can happen if someone manually leaves a reaction + on a pinned message, or a comment. + + We check this by asserting that `process_event` was never called. + """ + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=MockMessage()) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)): + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_valid_event_is_processed(self): + """ + If the reaction event is valid, it is passed to `process_event`. + + This is the case when everything goes right: + * The reaction was placed in #incidents, and not by a bot + * The message was found successfully + * The message qualifies as an incident + + Additionally, we check that all arguments were passed as expected. + """ + incident = MockMessage(id=1) + + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=incident) + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)): + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_called_with( + "reaction", # Defined in `self.payload` + incident, + self.payload.member, + ) + + +class TestOnMessage(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.on_message` listener. + + Notice the decorators mocking the `is_incident` return value. The `is_incidents` + function is tested in `TestIsIncident` - here we do not worry about it. + """ + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) + async def test_on_message_incident(self): + """Messages qualifying as incidents are passed to `add_signals`.""" + incident = MockMessage() + + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) as mock_add_signals: + await self.cog_instance.on_message(incident) + + mock_add_signals.assert_called_once_with(incident) + + @patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)) + async def test_on_message_non_incident(self): + """Messages not qualifying as incidents are ignored.""" + with patch("bot.exts.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) as mock_add_signals: + await self.cog_instance.on_message(MockMessage()) + + mock_add_signals.assert_not_called() diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_modlog.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_modlog.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f8f142484 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_modlog.py @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +import unittest + +import discord + +from bot.exts.moderation.modlog import ModLog +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockTextChannel + + +class ModLogTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests for moderation logs.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = MockBot() + self.cog = ModLog(self.bot) + self.channel = MockTextChannel() + + async def test_log_entry_description_truncation(self): + """Test that embed description for ModLog entry is truncated.""" + self.bot.get_channel.return_value = self.channel + await self.cog.send_log_message( + icon_url="foo", + colour=discord.Colour.blue(), + title="bar", + text="foo bar" * 3000 + ) + embed = self.channel.send.call_args[1]["embed"] + self.assertEqual( + embed.description, ("foo bar" * 3000)[:2045] + "..." + ) diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/test_silence.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_silence.py index 52b7d47f1..3c2d52ae0 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/test_silence.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_silence.py @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ from unittest.mock import MagicMock, Mock from discord import PermissionOverwrite -from bot.cogs.moderation.silence import Silence, SilenceNotifier from bot.constants import Channels, Emojis, Guild, Roles +from bot.exts.moderation.silence import Silence, SilenceNotifier from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext, MockTextChannel @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ class SilenceTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.bot.get_channel.called_once_with(Channels.mod_alerts) self.bot.get_channel.called_once_with(Channels.mod_log) - @mock.patch("bot.cogs.moderation.silence.SilenceNotifier") + @mock.patch("bot.exts.moderation.silence.SilenceNotifier") async def test_instance_vars_got_notifier(self, notifier): """Notifier was started with channel.""" mod_log = MockTextChannel() @@ -127,10 +127,20 @@ class SilenceTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.ctx.reset_mock() async def test_unsilence_sent_correct_discord_message(self): - """Proper reply after a successful unsilence.""" - with mock.patch.object(self.cog, "_unsilence", return_value=True): - await self.cog.unsilence(self.cog, self.ctx) - self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with(f"{Emojis.check_mark} unsilenced current channel.") + """Check if proper message was sent when unsilencing channel.""" + test_cases = ( + (True, f"{Emojis.check_mark} unsilenced current channel."), + (False, f"{Emojis.cross_mark} current channel was not silenced.") + ) + for _unsilence_patch_return, result_message in test_cases: + with self.subTest( + starting_silenced_state=_unsilence_patch_return, + result_message=result_message + ): + with mock.patch.object(self.cog, "_unsilence", return_value=_unsilence_patch_return): + await self.cog.unsilence(self.cog, self.ctx) + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with(result_message) + self.ctx.reset_mock() async def test_silence_private_for_false(self): """Permissions are not set and `False` is returned in an already silenced channel.""" @@ -228,7 +238,7 @@ class SilenceTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): del mock_permissions_dict['send_messages'] self.assertDictEqual(mock_permissions_dict, new_permissions) - @mock.patch("bot.cogs.moderation.silence.asyncio") + @mock.patch("bot.exts.moderation.silence.asyncio") @mock.patch.object(Silence, "_mod_alerts_channel", create=True) def test_cog_unload_starts_task(self, alert_channel, asyncio_mock): """Task for sending an alert was created with present `muted_channels`.""" @@ -237,15 +247,17 @@ class SilenceTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): alert_channel.send.assert_called_once_with(f"<@&{Roles.moderators}> channels left silenced on cog unload: ") asyncio_mock.create_task.assert_called_once_with(alert_channel.send()) - @mock.patch("bot.cogs.moderation.silence.asyncio") + @mock.patch("bot.exts.moderation.silence.asyncio") def test_cog_unload_skips_task_start(self, asyncio_mock): """No task created with no channels.""" self.cog.cog_unload() asyncio_mock.create_task.assert_not_called() - @mock.patch("bot.cogs.moderation.silence.with_role_check") - @mock.patch("bot.cogs.moderation.silence.MODERATION_ROLES", new=(1, 2, 3)) - def test_cog_check(self, role_check): + @mock.patch("discord.ext.commands.has_any_role") + @mock.patch("bot.exts.moderation.silence.MODERATION_ROLES", new=(1, 2, 3)) + async def test_cog_check(self, role_check): """Role check is called with `MODERATION_ROLES`""" - self.cog.cog_check(self.ctx) - role_check.assert_called_once_with(self.ctx, *(1, 2, 3)) + role_check.return_value.predicate = mock.AsyncMock() + await self.cog.cog_check(self.ctx) + role_check.assert_called_once_with(*(1, 2, 3)) + role_check.return_value.predicate.assert_awaited_once_with(self.ctx) diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_slowmode.py b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_slowmode.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dad751e0d --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/moderation/test_slowmode.py @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +import unittest +from unittest import mock + +from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta + +from bot.constants import Emojis +from bot.exts.moderation.slowmode import Slowmode +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext, MockTextChannel + + +class SlowmodeTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + + def setUp(self) -> None: + self.bot = MockBot() + self.cog = Slowmode(self.bot) + self.ctx = MockContext() + + async def test_get_slowmode_no_channel(self) -> None: + """Get slowmode without a given channel.""" + self.ctx.channel = MockTextChannel(name='python-general', slowmode_delay=5) + + await self.cog.get_slowmode(self.cog, self.ctx, None) + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with("The slowmode delay for #python-general is 5 seconds.") + + async def test_get_slowmode_with_channel(self) -> None: + """Get slowmode with a given channel.""" + text_channel = MockTextChannel(name='python-language', slowmode_delay=2) + + await self.cog.get_slowmode(self.cog, self.ctx, text_channel) + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with('The slowmode delay for #python-language is 2 seconds.') + + async def test_set_slowmode_no_channel(self) -> None: + """Set slowmode without a given channel.""" + test_cases = ( + ('helpers', 23, True, f'{Emojis.check_mark} The slowmode delay for #helpers is now 23 seconds.'), + ('mods', 76526, False, f'{Emojis.cross_mark} The slowmode delay must be between 0 and 6 hours.'), + ('admins', 97, True, f'{Emojis.check_mark} The slowmode delay for #admins is now 1 minute and 37 seconds.') + ) + + for channel_name, seconds, edited, result_msg in test_cases: + with self.subTest( + channel_mention=channel_name, + seconds=seconds, + edited=edited, + result_msg=result_msg + ): + self.ctx.channel = MockTextChannel(name=channel_name) + + await self.cog.set_slowmode(self.cog, self.ctx, None, relativedelta(seconds=seconds)) + + if edited: + self.ctx.channel.edit.assert_awaited_once_with(slowmode_delay=float(seconds)) + else: + self.ctx.channel.edit.assert_not_called() + + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with(result_msg) + + self.ctx.reset_mock() + + async def test_set_slowmode_with_channel(self) -> None: + """Set slowmode with a given channel.""" + test_cases = ( + ('bot-commands', 12, True, f'{Emojis.check_mark} The slowmode delay for #bot-commands is now 12 seconds.'), + ('mod-spam', 21, True, f'{Emojis.check_mark} The slowmode delay for #mod-spam is now 21 seconds.'), + ('admin-spam', 4323598, False, f'{Emojis.cross_mark} The slowmode delay must be between 0 and 6 hours.') + ) + + for channel_name, seconds, edited, result_msg in test_cases: + with self.subTest( + channel_mention=channel_name, + seconds=seconds, + edited=edited, + result_msg=result_msg + ): + text_channel = MockTextChannel(name=channel_name) + + await self.cog.set_slowmode(self.cog, self.ctx, text_channel, relativedelta(seconds=seconds)) + + if edited: + text_channel.edit.assert_awaited_once_with(slowmode_delay=float(seconds)) + else: + text_channel.edit.assert_not_called() + + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with(result_msg) + + self.ctx.reset_mock() + + async def test_reset_slowmode_no_channel(self) -> None: + """Reset slowmode without a given channel.""" + self.ctx.channel = MockTextChannel(name='careers', slowmode_delay=6) + + await self.cog.reset_slowmode(self.cog, self.ctx, None) + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with( + f'{Emojis.check_mark} The slowmode delay for #careers has been reset to 0 seconds.' + ) + + async def test_reset_slowmode_with_channel(self) -> None: + """Reset slowmode with a given channel.""" + text_channel = MockTextChannel(name='meta', slowmode_delay=1) + + await self.cog.reset_slowmode(self.cog, self.ctx, text_channel) + self.ctx.send.assert_called_once_with( + f'{Emojis.check_mark} The slowmode delay for #meta has been reset to 0 seconds.' + ) + + @mock.patch("bot.exts.moderation.slowmode.has_any_role") + @mock.patch("bot.exts.moderation.slowmode.MODERATION_ROLES", new=(1, 2, 3)) + async def test_cog_check(self, role_check): + """Role check is called with `MODERATION_ROLES`""" + role_check.return_value.predicate = mock.AsyncMock() + await self.cog.cog_check(self.ctx) + role_check.assert_called_once_with(*(1, 2, 3)) + role_check.return_value.predicate.assert_awaited_once_with(self.ctx) diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_cogs.py b/tests/bot/exts/test_cogs.py index 39f6492cb..f8e120262 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_cogs.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/test_cogs.py @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ from unittest import mock from discord.ext import commands -from bot import cogs +from bot import exts class CommandNameTests(unittest.TestCase): @@ -29,13 +29,14 @@ class CommandNameTests(unittest.TestCase): @staticmethod def walk_modules() -> t.Iterator[ModuleType]: - """Yield imported modules from the bot.cogs subpackage.""" + """Yield imported modules from the bot.exts subpackage.""" def on_error(name: str) -> t.NoReturn: - raise ImportError(name=name) + raise ImportError(name=name) # pragma: no cover # The mock prevents asyncio.get_event_loop() from being called. with mock.patch("discord.ext.tasks.loop"): - for module in pkgutil.walk_packages(cogs.__path__, "bot.cogs.", onerror=on_error): + prefix = f"{exts.__name__}." + for module in pkgutil.walk_packages(exts.__path__, prefix, onerror=on_error): if not module.ispkg: yield importlib.import_module(module.name) @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ class CommandNameTests(unittest.TestCase): """Return a list of all qualified names, including aliases, for the `command`.""" names = [f"{command.full_parent_name} {alias}".strip() for alias in command.aliases] names.append(command.qualified_name) + names += getattr(command, "root_aliases", []) return names @@ -71,7 +73,7 @@ class CommandNameTests(unittest.TestCase): for name in self.get_qualified_names(cmd): with self.subTest(cmd=func_name, name=name): - if name in all_names: + if name in all_names: # pragma: no cover conflicts = ", ".join(all_names.get(name, "")) self.fail( f"Name '{name}' of the command {func_name} conflicts with {conflicts}." diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/utils/__init__.py b/tests/bot/exts/utils/__init__.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e69de29bb --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/utils/__init__.py diff --git a/tests/bot/exts/utils/test_jams.py b/tests/bot/exts/utils/test_jams.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..45e7b5b51 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/exts/utils/test_jams.py @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, create_autospec + +from discord import CategoryChannel + +from bot.constants import Roles +from bot.exts.utils import jams +from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext, MockGuild, MockMember, MockRole, MockTextChannel + + +def get_mock_category(channel_count: int, name: str) -> CategoryChannel: + """Return a mocked code jam category.""" + category = create_autospec(CategoryChannel, spec_set=True, instance=True) + category.name = name + category.channels = [MockTextChannel() for _ in range(channel_count)] + + return category + + +class JamCreateTeamTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """Tests for `createteam` command.""" + + def setUp(self): + self.bot = MockBot() + self.admin_role = MockRole(name="Admins", id=Roles.admins) + self.command_user = MockMember([self.admin_role]) + self.guild = MockGuild([self.admin_role]) + self.ctx = MockContext(bot=self.bot, author=self.command_user, guild=self.guild) + self.cog = jams.CodeJams(self.bot) + + async def test_too_small_amount_of_team_members_passed(self): + """Should `ctx.send` and exit early when too small amount of members.""" + for case in (1, 2): + with self.subTest(amount_of_members=case): + self.cog.create_channels = AsyncMock() + self.cog.add_roles = AsyncMock() + + self.ctx.reset_mock() + members = (MockMember() for _ in range(case)) + await self.cog.createteam(self.cog, self.ctx, "foo", members) + + self.ctx.send.assert_awaited_once() + self.cog.create_channels.assert_not_awaited() + self.cog.add_roles.assert_not_awaited() + + async def test_duplicate_members_provided(self): + """Should `ctx.send` and exit early because duplicate members provided and total there is only 1 member.""" + self.cog.create_channels = AsyncMock() + self.cog.add_roles = AsyncMock() + + member = MockMember() + await self.cog.createteam(self.cog, self.ctx, "foo", (member for _ in range(5))) + + self.ctx.send.assert_awaited_once() + self.cog.create_channels.assert_not_awaited() + self.cog.add_roles.assert_not_awaited() + + async def test_result_sending(self): + """Should call `ctx.send` when everything goes right.""" + self.cog.create_channels = AsyncMock() + self.cog.add_roles = AsyncMock() + + members = [MockMember() for _ in range(5)] + await self.cog.createteam(self.cog, self.ctx, "foo", members) + + self.cog.create_channels.assert_awaited_once() + self.cog.add_roles.assert_awaited_once() + self.ctx.send.assert_awaited_once() + + async def test_category_doesnt_exist(self): + """Should create a new code jam category.""" + subtests = ( + [], + [get_mock_category(jams.MAX_CHANNELS - 1, jams.CATEGORY_NAME)], + [get_mock_category(jams.MAX_CHANNELS - 2, "other")], + ) + + for categories in subtests: + self.guild.reset_mock() + self.guild.categories = categories + + with self.subTest(categories=categories): + actual_category = await self.cog.get_category(self.guild) + + self.guild.create_category_channel.assert_awaited_once() + category_overwrites = self.guild.create_category_channel.call_args[1]["overwrites"] + + self.assertFalse(category_overwrites[self.guild.default_role].read_messages) + self.assertTrue(category_overwrites[self.guild.me].read_messages) + self.assertEqual(self.guild.create_category_channel.return_value, actual_category) + + async def test_category_channel_exist(self): + """Should not try to create category channel.""" + expected_category = get_mock_category(jams.MAX_CHANNELS - 2, jams.CATEGORY_NAME) + self.guild.categories = [ + get_mock_category(jams.MAX_CHANNELS - 2, "other"), + expected_category, + get_mock_category(0, jams.CATEGORY_NAME), + ] + + actual_category = await self.cog.get_category(self.guild) + self.assertEqual(expected_category, actual_category) + + async def test_channel_overwrites(self): + """Should have correct permission overwrites for users and roles.""" + leader = MockMember() + members = [leader] + [MockMember() for _ in range(4)] + overwrites = self.cog.get_overwrites(members, self.guild) + + # Leader permission overwrites + self.assertTrue(overwrites[leader].manage_messages) + self.assertTrue(overwrites[leader].read_messages) + self.assertTrue(overwrites[leader].manage_webhooks) + self.assertTrue(overwrites[leader].connect) + + # Other members permission overwrites + for member in members[1:]: + self.assertTrue(overwrites[member].read_messages) + self.assertTrue(overwrites[member].connect) + + # Everyone and verified role overwrite + self.assertFalse(overwrites[self.guild.default_role].read_messages) + self.assertFalse(overwrites[self.guild.default_role].connect) + self.assertFalse(overwrites[self.guild.get_role(Roles.verified)].read_messages) + self.assertFalse(overwrites[self.guild.get_role(Roles.verified)].connect) + + async def test_team_channels_creation(self): + """Should create new voice and text channel for team.""" + members = [MockMember() for _ in range(5)] + + self.cog.get_overwrites = MagicMock() + self.cog.get_category = AsyncMock() + self.ctx.guild.create_text_channel.return_value = MockTextChannel(mention="foobar-channel") + actual = await self.cog.create_channels(self.guild, "my-team", members) + + self.assertEqual("foobar-channel", actual) + self.cog.get_overwrites.assert_called_once_with(members, self.guild) + self.cog.get_category.assert_awaited_once_with(self.guild) + + self.guild.create_text_channel.assert_awaited_once_with( + "my-team", + overwrites=self.cog.get_overwrites.return_value, + category=self.cog.get_category.return_value + ) + self.guild.create_voice_channel.assert_awaited_once_with( + "My Team", + overwrites=self.cog.get_overwrites.return_value, + category=self.cog.get_category.return_value + ) + + async def test_jam_roles_adding(self): + """Should add team leader role to leader and jam role to every team member.""" + leader_role = MockRole(name="Team Leader") + jam_role = MockRole(name="Jammer") + self.guild.get_role.side_effect = [leader_role, jam_role] + + leader = MockMember() + members = [leader] + [MockMember() for _ in range(4)] + await self.cog.add_roles(self.guild, members) + + leader.add_roles.assert_any_await(leader_role) + for member in members: + member.add_roles.assert_any_await(jam_role) + + +class CodeJamSetup(unittest.TestCase): + """Test for `setup` function of `CodeJam` cog.""" + + def test_setup(self): + """Should call `bot.add_cog`.""" + bot = MockBot() + jams.setup(bot) + bot.add_cog.assert_called_once() diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/test_snekbox.py b/tests/bot/exts/utils/test_snekbox.py index bcb3550f8..6601fad2c 100644 --- a/tests/bot/cogs/test_snekbox.py +++ b/tests/bot/exts/utils/test_snekbox.py @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ import asyncio -import logging import unittest from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, Mock, call, create_autospec, patch from discord.ext import commands from bot import constants -from bot.cogs import snekbox -from bot.cogs.snekbox import Snekbox +from bot.exts.utils import snekbox +from bot.exts.utils.snekbox import Snekbox from tests.helpers import MockBot, MockContext, MockMessage, MockReaction, MockUser @@ -21,7 +20,10 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): """Post the eval code to the URLs.snekbox_eval_api endpoint.""" resp = MagicMock() resp.json = AsyncMock(return_value="return") - self.bot.http_session.post().__aenter__.return_value = resp + + context_manager = MagicMock() + context_manager.__aenter__.return_value = resp + self.bot.http_session.post.return_value = context_manager self.assertEqual(await self.cog.post_eval("import random"), "return") self.bot.http_session.post.assert_called_with( @@ -36,37 +38,14 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): result = await self.cog.upload_output("-" * (snekbox.MAX_PASTE_LEN + 1)) self.assertEqual(result, "too long to upload") - async def test_upload_output(self): + @patch("bot.exts.utils.snekbox.send_to_paste_service") + async def test_upload_output(self, mock_paste_util): """Upload the eval output to the URLs.paste_service.format(key="documents") endpoint.""" - key = "MarkDiamond" - resp = MagicMock() - resp.json = AsyncMock(return_value={"key": key}) - self.bot.http_session.post().__aenter__.return_value = resp - - self.assertEqual( - await self.cog.upload_output("My awesome output"), - constants.URLs.paste_service.format(key=key) - ) - self.bot.http_session.post.assert_called_with( - constants.URLs.paste_service.format(key="documents"), - data="My awesome output", - raise_for_status=True + await self.cog.upload_output("Test output.") + mock_paste_util.assert_called_once_with( + self.bot.http_session, "Test output.", extension="txt" ) - async def test_upload_output_gracefully_fallback_if_exception_during_request(self): - """Output upload gracefully fallback if the upload fail.""" - resp = MagicMock() - resp.json = AsyncMock(side_effect=Exception) - self.bot.http_session.post().__aenter__.return_value = resp - - log = logging.getLogger("bot.cogs.snekbox") - with self.assertLogs(logger=log, level='ERROR'): - await self.cog.upload_output('My awesome output!') - - async def test_upload_output_gracefully_fallback_if_no_key_in_response(self): - """Output upload gracefully fallback if there is no key entry in the response body.""" - self.assertEqual((await self.cog.upload_output('My awesome output!')), None) - def test_prepare_input(self): cases = ( ('print("Hello world!")', 'print("Hello world!")', 'non-formatted'), @@ -90,14 +69,14 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): actual = self.cog.get_results_message({'stdout': stdout, 'returncode': returncode}) self.assertEqual(actual, expected) - @patch('bot.cogs.snekbox.Signals', side_effect=ValueError) + @patch('bot.exts.utils.snekbox.Signals', side_effect=ValueError) def test_get_results_message_invalid_signal(self, mock_signals: Mock): self.assertEqual( self.cog.get_results_message({'stdout': '', 'returncode': 127}), ('Your eval job has completed with return code 127', '') ) - @patch('bot.cogs.snekbox.Signals') + @patch('bot.exts.utils.snekbox.Signals') def test_get_results_message_valid_signal(self, mock_signals: Mock): mock_signals.return_value.name = 'SIGTEST' self.assertEqual( @@ -138,12 +117,12 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): ('<!@', ("<!@\u200B", None), r'Convert <!@ to <!@\u200B'), ( '\u202E\u202E\u202E', - ('Code block escape attempt detected; will not output result', None), + ('Code block escape attempt detected; will not output result', 'https://testificate.com/'), 'Detect RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE' ), ( '\u200B\u200B\u200B', - ('Code block escape attempt detected; will not output result', None), + ('Code block escape attempt detected; will not output result', 'https://testificate.com/'), 'Detect ZERO WIDTH SPACE' ), ('long\nbeard', ('001 | long\n002 | beard', None), 'Two line output'), @@ -208,10 +187,9 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): async def test_eval_command_call_help(self): """Test if the eval command call the help command if no code is provided.""" - ctx = MockContext() - ctx.invoke = AsyncMock() + ctx = MockContext(command="sentinel") await self.cog.eval_command(self.cog, ctx=ctx, code='') - ctx.send_help.assert_called_once_with("eval") + ctx.send_help.assert_called_once_with(ctx.command) async def test_send_eval(self): """Test the send_eval function.""" @@ -225,9 +203,13 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.cog.get_status_emoji = MagicMock(return_value=':yay!:') self.cog.format_output = AsyncMock(return_value=('[No output]', None)) + mocked_filter_cog = MagicMock() + mocked_filter_cog.filter_eval = AsyncMock(return_value=False) + self.bot.get_cog.return_value = mocked_filter_cog + await self.cog.send_eval(ctx, 'MyAwesomeCode') ctx.send.assert_called_once_with( - '@LemonLemonishBeard#0042 :yay!: Return code 0.\n\n```py\n[No output]\n```' + '@LemonLemonishBeard#0042 :yay!: Return code 0.\n\n```\n[No output]\n```' ) self.cog.post_eval.assert_called_once_with('MyAwesomeCode') self.cog.get_status_emoji.assert_called_once_with({'stdout': '', 'returncode': 0}) @@ -246,10 +228,14 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.cog.get_status_emoji = MagicMock(return_value=':yay!:') self.cog.format_output = AsyncMock(return_value=('Way too long beard', 'lookatmybeard.com')) + mocked_filter_cog = MagicMock() + mocked_filter_cog.filter_eval = AsyncMock(return_value=False) + self.bot.get_cog.return_value = mocked_filter_cog + await self.cog.send_eval(ctx, 'MyAwesomeCode') ctx.send.assert_called_once_with( '@LemonLemonishBeard#0042 :yay!: Return code 0.' - '\n\n```py\nWay too long beard\n```\nFull output: lookatmybeard.com' + '\n\n```\nWay too long beard\n```\nFull output: lookatmybeard.com' ) self.cog.post_eval.assert_called_once_with('MyAwesomeCode') self.cog.get_status_emoji.assert_called_once_with({'stdout': 'Way too long beard', 'returncode': 0}) @@ -267,16 +253,20 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.cog.get_status_emoji = MagicMock(return_value=':nope!:') self.cog.format_output = AsyncMock() # This function isn't called + mocked_filter_cog = MagicMock() + mocked_filter_cog.filter_eval = AsyncMock(return_value=False) + self.bot.get_cog.return_value = mocked_filter_cog + await self.cog.send_eval(ctx, 'MyAwesomeCode') ctx.send.assert_called_once_with( - '@LemonLemonishBeard#0042 :nope!: Return code 127.\n\n```py\nBeard got stuck in the eval\n```' + '@LemonLemonishBeard#0042 :nope!: Return code 127.\n\n```\nBeard got stuck in the eval\n```' ) self.cog.post_eval.assert_called_once_with('MyAwesomeCode') self.cog.get_status_emoji.assert_called_once_with({'stdout': 'ERROR', 'returncode': 127}) self.cog.get_results_message.assert_called_once_with({'stdout': 'ERROR', 'returncode': 127}) self.cog.format_output.assert_not_called() - @patch("bot.cogs.snekbox.partial") + @patch("bot.exts.utils.snekbox.partial") async def test_continue_eval_does_continue(self, partial_mock): """Test that the continue_eval function does continue if required conditions are met.""" ctx = MockContext(message=MockMessage(add_reaction=AsyncMock(), clear_reactions=AsyncMock())) @@ -291,7 +281,11 @@ class SnekboxTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): self.assertEqual(actual, expected) self.bot.wait_for.assert_has_awaits( ( - call('message_edit', check=partial_mock(snekbox.predicate_eval_message_edit, ctx), timeout=10), + call( + 'message_edit', + check=partial_mock(snekbox.predicate_eval_message_edit, ctx), + timeout=snekbox.REEVAL_TIMEOUT, + ), call('reaction_add', check=partial_mock(snekbox.predicate_eval_emoji_reaction, ctx), timeout=10) ) ) diff --git a/tests/bot/test_constants.py b/tests/bot/test_constants.py index dae7c066c..f10d6fbe8 100644 --- a/tests/bot/test_constants.py +++ b/tests/bot/test_constants.py @@ -1,14 +1,40 @@ import inspect +import typing import unittest from bot import constants +def is_annotation_instance(value: typing.Any, annotation: typing.Any) -> bool: + """ + Return True if `value` is an instance of the type represented by `annotation`. + + This doesn't account for things like Unions or checking for homogenous types in collections. + """ + origin = typing.get_origin(annotation) + + # This is done in case a bare e.g. `typing.List` is used. + # In such case, for the assertion to pass, the type needs to be normalised to e.g. `list`. + # `get_origin()` does this normalisation for us. + type_ = annotation if origin is None else origin + + return isinstance(value, type_) + + +def is_any_instance(value: typing.Any, types: typing.Collection) -> bool: + """Return True if `value` is an instance of any type in `types`.""" + for type_ in types: + if is_annotation_instance(value, type_): + return True + + return False + + class ConstantsTests(unittest.TestCase): """Tests for our constants.""" def test_section_configuration_matches_type_specification(self): - """The section annotations should match the actual types of the sections.""" + """"The section annotations should match the actual types of the sections.""" sections = ( cls @@ -17,10 +43,15 @@ class ConstantsTests(unittest.TestCase): ) for section in sections: for name, annotation in section.__annotations__.items(): - with self.subTest(section=section, name=name, annotation=annotation): + with self.subTest(section=section.__name__, name=name, annotation=annotation): value = getattr(section, name) + origin = typing.get_origin(annotation) + annotation_args = typing.get_args(annotation) + failure_msg = f"{value} is not an instance of {annotation}" - if getattr(annotation, '_name', None) in ('Dict', 'List'): - self.skipTest("Cannot validate containers yet.") - - self.assertIsInstance(value, annotation) + if origin is typing.Union: + is_instance = is_any_instance(value, annotation_args) + self.assertTrue(is_instance, failure_msg) + else: + is_instance = is_annotation_instance(value, annotation) + self.assertTrue(is_instance, failure_msg) diff --git a/tests/bot/test_converters.py b/tests/bot/test_converters.py index ca8cb6825..c42111f3f 100644 --- a/tests/bot/test_converters.py +++ b/tests/bot/test_converters.py @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -import asyncio import datetime +import re import unittest from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ from bot.converters import ( ) -class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): +class ConverterTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): """Tests our custom argument converters.""" @classmethod @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): cls.fixed_utc_now = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat('2019-01-01T00:00:00') - def test_tag_content_converter_for_valid(self): + async def test_tag_content_converter_for_valid(self): """TagContentConverter should return correct values for valid input.""" test_values = ( ('hello', 'hello'), @@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): for content, expected_conversion in test_values: with self.subTest(content=content, expected_conversion=expected_conversion): - conversion = asyncio.run(TagContentConverter.convert(self.context, content)) + conversion = await TagContentConverter.convert(self.context, content) self.assertEqual(conversion, expected_conversion) - def test_tag_content_converter_for_invalid(self): + async def test_tag_content_converter_for_invalid(self): """TagContentConverter should raise the proper exception for invalid input.""" test_values = ( ('', "Tag contents should not be empty, or filled with whitespace."), @@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): for value, exception_message in test_values: with self.subTest(tag_content=value, exception_message=exception_message): - with self.assertRaises(BadArgument, msg=exception_message): - asyncio.run(TagContentConverter.convert(self.context, value)) + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await TagContentConverter.convert(self.context, value) - def test_tag_name_converter_for_valid(self): + async def test_tag_name_converter_for_valid(self): """TagNameConverter should return the correct values for valid tag names.""" test_values = ( ('tracebacks', 'tracebacks'), @@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): for name, expected_conversion in test_values: with self.subTest(name=name, expected_conversion=expected_conversion): - conversion = asyncio.run(TagNameConverter.convert(self.context, name)) + conversion = await TagNameConverter.convert(self.context, name) self.assertEqual(conversion, expected_conversion) - def test_tag_name_converter_for_invalid(self): + async def test_tag_name_converter_for_invalid(self): """TagNameConverter should raise the correct exception for invalid tag names.""" test_values = ( ('👋', "Don't be ridiculous, you can't use that character!"), @@ -75,29 +75,29 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): for invalid_name, exception_message in test_values: with self.subTest(invalid_name=invalid_name, exception_message=exception_message): - with self.assertRaises(BadArgument, msg=exception_message): - asyncio.run(TagNameConverter.convert(self.context, invalid_name)) + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await TagNameConverter.convert(self.context, invalid_name) - def test_valid_python_identifier_for_valid(self): + async def test_valid_python_identifier_for_valid(self): """ValidPythonIdentifier returns valid identifiers unchanged.""" test_values = ('foo', 'lemon') for name in test_values: with self.subTest(identifier=name): - conversion = asyncio.run(ValidPythonIdentifier.convert(self.context, name)) + conversion = await ValidPythonIdentifier.convert(self.context, name) self.assertEqual(name, conversion) - def test_valid_python_identifier_for_invalid(self): + async def test_valid_python_identifier_for_invalid(self): """ValidPythonIdentifier raises the proper exception for invalid identifiers.""" test_values = ('nested.stuff', '#####') for name in test_values: with self.subTest(identifier=name): exception_message = f'`{name}` is not a valid Python identifier' - with self.assertRaises(BadArgument, msg=exception_message): - asyncio.run(ValidPythonIdentifier.convert(self.context, name)) + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await ValidPythonIdentifier.convert(self.context, name) - def test_duration_converter_for_valid(self): + async def test_duration_converter_for_valid(self): """Duration returns the correct `datetime` for valid duration strings.""" test_values = ( # Simple duration strings @@ -159,35 +159,35 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): mock_datetime.utcnow.return_value = self.fixed_utc_now with self.subTest(duration=duration, duration_dict=duration_dict): - converted_datetime = asyncio.run(converter.convert(self.context, duration)) + converted_datetime = await converter.convert(self.context, duration) self.assertEqual(converted_datetime, expected_datetime) - def test_duration_converter_for_invalid(self): + async def test_duration_converter_for_invalid(self): """Duration raises the right exception for invalid duration strings.""" test_values = ( # Units in wrong order - ('1d1w'), - ('1s1y'), + '1d1w', + '1s1y', # Duplicated units - ('1 year 2 years'), - ('1 M 10 minutes'), + '1 year 2 years', + '1 M 10 minutes', # Unknown substrings - ('1MVes'), - ('1y3breads'), + '1MVes', + '1y3breads', # Missing amount - ('ym'), + 'ym', # Incorrect whitespace - (" 1y"), - ("1S "), - ("1y 1m"), + " 1y", + "1S ", + "1y 1m", # Garbage - ('Guido van Rossum'), - ('lemon lemon lemon lemon lemon lemon lemon'), + 'Guido van Rossum', + 'lemon lemon lemon lemon lemon lemon lemon', ) converter = Duration() @@ -195,10 +195,21 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): for invalid_duration in test_values: with self.subTest(invalid_duration=invalid_duration): exception_message = f'`{invalid_duration}` is not a valid duration string.' - with self.assertRaises(BadArgument, msg=exception_message): - asyncio.run(converter.convert(self.context, invalid_duration)) + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await converter.convert(self.context, invalid_duration) - def test_isodatetime_converter_for_valid(self): + @patch("bot.converters.datetime") + async def test_duration_converter_out_of_range(self, mock_datetime): + """Duration converter should raise BadArgument if datetime raises a ValueError.""" + mock_datetime.__add__.side_effect = ValueError + mock_datetime.utcnow.return_value = mock_datetime + + duration = f"{datetime.MAXYEAR}y" + exception_message = f"`{duration}` results in a datetime outside the supported range." + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await Duration().convert(self.context, duration) + + async def test_isodatetime_converter_for_valid(self): """ISODateTime converter returns correct datetime for valid datetime string.""" test_values = ( # `YYYY-mm-ddTHH:MM:SSZ` | `YYYY-mm-dd HH:MM:SSZ` @@ -243,37 +254,37 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): for datetime_string, expected_dt in test_values: with self.subTest(datetime_string=datetime_string, expected_dt=expected_dt): - converted_dt = asyncio.run(converter.convert(self.context, datetime_string)) + converted_dt = await converter.convert(self.context, datetime_string) self.assertIsNone(converted_dt.tzinfo) self.assertEqual(converted_dt, expected_dt) - def test_isodatetime_converter_for_invalid(self): + async def test_isodatetime_converter_for_invalid(self): """ISODateTime converter raises the correct exception for invalid datetime strings.""" test_values = ( # Make sure it doesn't interfere with the Duration converter - ('1Y'), - ('1d'), - ('1H'), + '1Y', + '1d', + '1H', # Check if it fails when only providing the optional time part - ('10:10:10'), - ('10:00'), + '10:10:10', + '10:00', # Invalid date format - ('19-01-01'), + '19-01-01', # Other non-valid strings - ('fisk the tag master'), + 'fisk the tag master', ) converter = ISODateTime() for datetime_string in test_values: with self.subTest(datetime_string=datetime_string): exception_message = f"`{datetime_string}` is not a valid ISO-8601 datetime string" - with self.assertRaises(BadArgument, msg=exception_message): - asyncio.run(converter.convert(self.context, datetime_string)) + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await converter.convert(self.context, datetime_string) - def test_hush_duration_converter_for_valid(self): + async def test_hush_duration_converter_for_valid(self): """HushDurationConverter returns correct value for minutes duration or `"forever"` strings.""" test_values = ( ("0", 0), @@ -286,10 +297,10 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): converter = HushDurationConverter() for minutes_string, expected_minutes in test_values: with self.subTest(minutes_string=minutes_string, expected_minutes=expected_minutes): - converted = asyncio.run(converter.convert(self.context, minutes_string)) + converted = await converter.convert(self.context, minutes_string) self.assertEqual(expected_minutes, converted) - def test_hush_duration_converter_for_invalid(self): + async def test_hush_duration_converter_for_invalid(self): """HushDurationConverter raises correct exception for invalid minutes duration strings.""" test_values = ( ("16", "Duration must be at most 15 minutes."), @@ -299,5 +310,5 @@ class ConverterTests(unittest.TestCase): converter = HushDurationConverter() for invalid_minutes_string, exception_message in test_values: with self.subTest(invalid_minutes_string=invalid_minutes_string, exception_message=exception_message): - with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, exception_message): - asyncio.run(converter.convert(self.context, invalid_minutes_string)) + with self.assertRaisesRegex(BadArgument, re.escape(exception_message)): + await converter.convert(self.context, invalid_minutes_string) diff --git a/tests/bot/test_decorators.py b/tests/bot/test_decorators.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3d450caa0 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/test_decorators.py @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +import collections +import unittest +import unittest.mock + +from bot import constants +from bot.decorators import in_whitelist +from bot.utils.checks import InWhitelistCheckFailure +from tests import helpers + +InWhitelistTestCase = collections.namedtuple("WhitelistedContextTestCase", ("kwargs", "ctx", "description")) + + +class InWhitelistTests(unittest.TestCase): + """Tests for the `in_whitelist` check.""" + + @classmethod + def setUpClass(cls): + """Set up helpers that only need to be defined once.""" + cls.bot_commands = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=123456789, category_id=123456) + cls.help_channel = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=987654321, category_id=987654) + cls.non_whitelisted_channel = helpers.MockTextChannel(id=666666) + cls.dm_channel = helpers.MockDMChannel() + + cls.non_staff_member = helpers.MockMember() + cls.staff_role = helpers.MockRole(id=121212) + cls.staff_member = helpers.MockMember(roles=(cls.staff_role,)) + + cls.channels = (cls.bot_commands.id,) + cls.categories = (cls.help_channel.category_id,) + cls.roles = (cls.staff_role.id,) + + def test_predicate_returns_true_for_whitelisted_context(self): + """The predicate should return `True` if a whitelisted context was passed to it.""" + test_cases = ( + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={"channels": self.channels}, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.bot_commands, author=self.non_staff_member), + description="In whitelisted channels by members without whitelisted roles", + ), + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={"redirect": self.bot_commands.id}, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.bot_commands, author=self.non_staff_member), + description="`redirect` should be implicitly added to `channels`", + ), + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={"categories": self.categories}, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.help_channel, author=self.non_staff_member), + description="Whitelisted category without whitelisted role", + ), + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={"roles": self.roles}, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.non_whitelisted_channel, author=self.staff_member), + description="Whitelisted role outside of whitelisted channel/category" + ), + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={ + "channels": self.channels, + "categories": self.categories, + "roles": self.roles, + "redirect": self.bot_commands, + }, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.help_channel, author=self.staff_member), + description="Case with all whitelist kwargs used", + ), + ) + + for test_case in test_cases: + # patch `commands.check` with a no-op lambda that just returns the predicate passed to it + # so we can test the predicate that was generated from the specified kwargs. + with unittest.mock.patch("bot.decorators.commands.check", new=lambda predicate: predicate): + predicate = in_whitelist(**test_case.kwargs) + + with self.subTest(test_description=test_case.description): + self.assertTrue(predicate(test_case.ctx)) + + def test_predicate_raises_exception_for_non_whitelisted_context(self): + """The predicate should raise `InWhitelistCheckFailure` for a non-whitelisted context.""" + test_cases = ( + # Failing check with explicit `redirect` + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={ + "categories": self.categories, + "channels": self.channels, + "roles": self.roles, + "redirect": self.bot_commands.id, + }, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.non_whitelisted_channel, author=self.non_staff_member), + description="Failing check with an explicit redirect channel", + ), + + # Failing check with implicit `redirect` + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={ + "categories": self.categories, + "channels": self.channels, + "roles": self.roles, + }, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.non_whitelisted_channel, author=self.non_staff_member), + description="Failing check with an implicit redirect channel", + ), + + # Failing check without `redirect` + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={ + "categories": self.categories, + "channels": self.channels, + "roles": self.roles, + "redirect": None, + }, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.non_whitelisted_channel, author=self.non_staff_member), + description="Failing check without a redirect channel", + ), + + # Command issued in DM channel + InWhitelistTestCase( + kwargs={ + "categories": self.categories, + "channels": self.channels, + "roles": self.roles, + "redirect": None, + }, + ctx=helpers.MockContext(channel=self.dm_channel, author=self.dm_channel.me), + description="Commands issued in DM channel should be rejected", + ), + ) + + for test_case in test_cases: + if "redirect" not in test_case.kwargs or test_case.kwargs["redirect"] is not None: + # There are two cases in which we have a redirect channel: + # 1. No redirect channel was passed; the default value of `bot_commands` is used + # 2. An explicit `redirect` is set that is "not None" + redirect_channel = test_case.kwargs.get("redirect", constants.Channels.bot_commands) + redirect_message = f" here. Please use the <#{redirect_channel}> channel instead" + else: + # If an explicit `None` was passed for `redirect`, there is no redirect channel + redirect_message = "" + + exception_message = f"You are not allowed to use that command{redirect_message}." + + # patch `commands.check` with a no-op lambda that just returns the predicate passed to it + # so we can test the predicate that was generated from the specified kwargs. + with unittest.mock.patch("bot.decorators.commands.check", new=lambda predicate: predicate): + predicate = in_whitelist(**test_case.kwargs) + + with self.subTest(test_description=test_case.description): + with self.assertRaisesRegex(InWhitelistCheckFailure, exception_message): + predicate(test_case.ctx) diff --git a/tests/bot/test_pagination.py b/tests/bot/test_pagination.py index 0a734b505..630f2516d 100644 --- a/tests/bot/test_pagination.py +++ b/tests/bot/test_pagination.py @@ -8,29 +8,39 @@ class LinePaginatorTests(TestCase): def setUp(self): """Create a paginator for the test method.""" - self.paginator = pagination.LinePaginator(prefix='', suffix='', max_size=30) - - def test_add_line_raises_on_too_long_lines(self): - """`add_line` should raise a `RuntimeError` for too long lines.""" - message = f"Line exceeds maximum page size {self.paginator.max_size - 2}" - with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError, msg=message): - self.paginator.add_line('x' * self.paginator.max_size) + self.paginator = pagination.LinePaginator(prefix='', suffix='', max_size=30, + scale_to_size=50) def test_add_line_works_on_small_lines(self): """`add_line` should allow small lines to be added.""" self.paginator.add_line('x' * (self.paginator.max_size - 3)) - - -class ImagePaginatorTests(TestCase): - """Tests functionality of the `ImagePaginator`.""" - - def setUp(self): - """Create a paginator for the test method.""" - self.paginator = pagination.ImagePaginator() - - def test_add_image_appends_image(self): - """`add_image` appends the image to the image list.""" - image = 'lemon' - self.paginator.add_image(image) - - assert self.paginator.images == [image] + # Note that the page isn't added to _pages until it's full. + self.assertEqual(len(self.paginator._pages), 0) + + def test_add_line_works_on_long_lines(self): + """After additional lines after `max_size` is exceeded should go on the next page.""" + self.paginator.add_line('x' * self.paginator.max_size) + self.assertEqual(len(self.paginator._pages), 0) + + # Any additional lines should start a new page after `max_size` is exceeded. + self.paginator.add_line('x') + self.assertEqual(len(self.paginator._pages), 1) + + def test_add_line_continuation(self): + """When `scale_to_size` is exceeded, remaining words should be split onto the next page.""" + self.paginator.add_line('zyz ' * (self.paginator.scale_to_size//4 + 1)) + self.assertEqual(len(self.paginator._pages), 1) + + def test_add_line_no_continuation(self): + """If adding a new line to an existing page would exceed `max_size`, it should start a new + page rather than using continuation. + """ + self.paginator.add_line('z' * (self.paginator.max_size - 3)) + self.paginator.add_line('z') + self.assertEqual(len(self.paginator._pages), 1) + + def test_add_line_truncates_very_long_words(self): + """`add_line` should truncate if a single long word exceeds `scale_to_size`.""" + self.paginator.add_line('x' * (self.paginator.scale_to_size + 1)) + # Note: item at index 1 is the truncated line, index 0 is prefix + self.assertEqual(self.paginator._current_page[1], 'x' * self.paginator.scale_to_size) diff --git a/tests/bot/utils/test_checks.py b/tests/bot/utils/test_checks.py index 9610771e5..883465e0b 100644 --- a/tests/bot/utils/test_checks.py +++ b/tests/bot/utils/test_checks.py @@ -1,51 +1,93 @@ import unittest +from unittest.mock import MagicMock + +from discord import DMChannel from bot.utils import checks +from bot.utils.checks import InWhitelistCheckFailure from tests.helpers import MockContext, MockRole -class ChecksTests(unittest.TestCase): +class ChecksTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): """Tests the check functions defined in `bot.checks`.""" def setUp(self): self.ctx = MockContext() - def test_with_role_check_without_guild(self): - """`with_role_check` returns `False` if `Context.guild` is None.""" - self.ctx.guild = None - self.assertFalse(checks.with_role_check(self.ctx)) + async def test_has_any_role_check_without_guild(self): + """`has_any_role_check` returns `False` for non-guild channels.""" + self.ctx.channel = MagicMock(DMChannel) + self.assertFalse(await checks.has_any_role_check(self.ctx)) - def test_with_role_check_without_required_roles(self): - """`with_role_check` returns `False` if `Context.author` lacks the required role.""" + async def test_has_any_role_check_without_required_roles(self): + """`has_any_role_check` returns `False` if `Context.author` lacks the required role.""" self.ctx.author.roles = [] - self.assertFalse(checks.with_role_check(self.ctx)) + self.assertFalse(await checks.has_any_role_check(self.ctx)) - def test_with_role_check_with_guild_and_required_role(self): - """`with_role_check` returns `True` if `Context.author` has the required role.""" + async def test_has_any_role_check_with_guild_and_required_role(self): + """`has_any_role_check` returns `True` if `Context.author` has the required role.""" self.ctx.author.roles.append(MockRole(id=10)) - self.assertTrue(checks.with_role_check(self.ctx, 10)) + self.assertTrue(await checks.has_any_role_check(self.ctx, 10)) - def test_without_role_check_without_guild(self): - """`without_role_check` should return `False` when `Context.guild` is None.""" - self.ctx.guild = None - self.assertFalse(checks.without_role_check(self.ctx)) + async def test_has_no_roles_check_without_guild(self): + """`has_no_roles_check` should return `False` when `Context.guild` is None.""" + self.ctx.channel = MagicMock(DMChannel) + self.assertFalse(await checks.has_no_roles_check(self.ctx)) - def test_without_role_check_returns_false_with_unwanted_role(self): - """`without_role_check` returns `False` if `Context.author` has unwanted role.""" + async def test_has_no_roles_check_returns_false_with_unwanted_role(self): + """`has_no_roles_check` returns `False` if `Context.author` has unwanted role.""" role_id = 42 self.ctx.author.roles.append(MockRole(id=role_id)) - self.assertFalse(checks.without_role_check(self.ctx, role_id)) + self.assertFalse(await checks.has_no_roles_check(self.ctx, role_id)) - def test_without_role_check_returns_true_without_unwanted_role(self): - """`without_role_check` returns `True` if `Context.author` does not have unwanted role.""" + async def test_has_no_roles_check_returns_true_without_unwanted_role(self): + """`has_no_roles_check` returns `True` if `Context.author` does not have unwanted role.""" role_id = 42 self.ctx.author.roles.append(MockRole(id=role_id)) - self.assertTrue(checks.without_role_check(self.ctx, role_id + 10)) + self.assertTrue(await checks.has_no_roles_check(self.ctx, role_id + 10)) + + def test_in_whitelist_check_correct_channel(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` returns `True` if `Context.channel.id` is in the channel list.""" + channel_id = 3 + self.ctx.channel.id = channel_id + self.assertTrue(checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, [channel_id])) + + def test_in_whitelist_check_incorrect_channel(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` raises InWhitelistCheckFailure if there's no channel match.""" + self.ctx.channel.id = 3 + with self.assertRaises(InWhitelistCheckFailure): + checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, [4]) + + def test_in_whitelist_check_correct_category(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` returns `True` if `Context.channel.category_id` is in the category list.""" + category_id = 3 + self.ctx.channel.category_id = category_id + self.assertTrue(checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, categories=[category_id])) + + def test_in_whitelist_check_incorrect_category(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` raises InWhitelistCheckFailure if there's no category match.""" + self.ctx.channel.category_id = 3 + with self.assertRaises(InWhitelistCheckFailure): + checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, categories=[4]) + + def test_in_whitelist_check_correct_role(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` returns `True` if any of the `Context.author.roles` are in the roles list.""" + self.ctx.author.roles = (MagicMock(id=1), MagicMock(id=2)) + self.assertTrue(checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, roles=[2, 6])) + + def test_in_whitelist_check_incorrect_role(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` raises InWhitelistCheckFailure if there's no role match.""" + self.ctx.author.roles = (MagicMock(id=1), MagicMock(id=2)) + with self.assertRaises(InWhitelistCheckFailure): + checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, roles=[4]) - def test_in_channel_check_for_correct_channel(self): - self.ctx.channel.id = 42 - self.assertTrue(checks.in_channel_check(self.ctx, *[42])) + def test_in_whitelist_check_fail_silently(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` test no exception raised if `fail_silently` is `True`""" + self.assertFalse(checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, roles=[2, 6], fail_silently=True)) - def test_in_channel_check_for_incorrect_channel(self): - self.ctx.channel.id = 42 + 10 - self.assertFalse(checks.in_channel_check(self.ctx, *[42])) + def test_in_whitelist_check_complex(self): + """`in_whitelist_check` test with multiple parameters""" + self.ctx.author.roles = (MagicMock(id=1), MagicMock(id=2)) + self.ctx.channel.category_id = 3 + self.ctx.channel.id = 5 + self.assertTrue(checks.in_whitelist_check(self.ctx, channels=[1], categories=[8], roles=[2])) diff --git a/tests/bot/utils/test_messages.py b/tests/bot/utils/test_messages.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9c22c9751 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/utils/test_messages.py @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +import unittest + +from bot.utils import messages + + +class TestMessages(unittest.TestCase): + """Tests for functions in the `bot.utils.messages` module.""" + + def test_sub_clyde(self): + """Uppercase E's and lowercase e's are substituted with their cyrillic counterparts.""" + sub_e = "\u0435" + sub_E = "\u0415" # noqa: N806: Uppercase E in variable name + + test_cases = ( + (None, None), + ("", ""), + ("clyde", f"clyd{sub_e}"), + ("CLYDE", f"CLYD{sub_E}"), + ("cLyDe", f"cLyD{sub_e}"), + ("BIGclyde", f"BIGclyd{sub_e}"), + ("small clydeus the unholy", f"small clyd{sub_e}us the unholy"), + ("BIGCLYDE, babyclyde", f"BIGCLYD{sub_E}, babyclyd{sub_e}"), + ) + + for username_in, username_out in test_cases: + with self.subTest(input=username_in, expected_output=username_out): + self.assertEqual(messages.sub_clyde(username_in), username_out) diff --git a/tests/bot/utils/test_services.py b/tests/bot/utils/test_services.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5e0855704 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/utils/test_services.py @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +import logging +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, Mock, patch + +from aiohttp import ClientConnectorError + +from bot.utils.services import FAILED_REQUEST_ATTEMPTS, send_to_paste_service + + +class PasteTests(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + def setUp(self) -> None: + self.http_session = MagicMock() + + @patch("bot.utils.services.URLs.paste_service", "https://paste_service.com/{key}") + async def test_url_and_sent_contents(self): + """Correct url was used and post was called with expected data.""" + response = MagicMock( + json=AsyncMock(return_value={"key": ""}) + ) + self.http_session.post().__aenter__.return_value = response + self.http_session.post.reset_mock() + await send_to_paste_service(self.http_session, "Content") + self.http_session.post.assert_called_once_with("https://paste_service.com/documents", data="Content") + + @patch("bot.utils.services.URLs.paste_service", "https://paste_service.com/{key}") + async def test_paste_returns_correct_url_on_success(self): + """Url with specified extension is returned on successful requests.""" + key = "paste_key" + test_cases = ( + (f"https://paste_service.com/{key}.txt", "txt"), + (f"https://paste_service.com/{key}.py", "py"), + (f"https://paste_service.com/{key}", ""), + ) + response = MagicMock( + json=AsyncMock(return_value={"key": key}) + ) + self.http_session.post().__aenter__.return_value = response + + for expected_output, extension in test_cases: + with self.subTest(msg=f"Send contents with extension {repr(extension)}"): + self.assertEqual( + await send_to_paste_service(self.http_session, "", extension=extension), + expected_output + ) + + async def test_request_repeated_on_json_errors(self): + """Json with error message and invalid json are handled as errors and requests repeated.""" + test_cases = ({"message": "error"}, {"unexpected_key": None}, {}) + self.http_session.post().__aenter__.return_value = response = MagicMock() + self.http_session.post.reset_mock() + + for error_json in test_cases: + with self.subTest(error_json=error_json): + response.json = AsyncMock(return_value=error_json) + result = await send_to_paste_service(self.http_session, "") + self.assertEqual(self.http_session.post.call_count, FAILED_REQUEST_ATTEMPTS) + self.assertIsNone(result) + + self.http_session.post.reset_mock() + + async def test_request_repeated_on_connection_errors(self): + """Requests are repeated in the case of connection errors.""" + self.http_session.post = MagicMock(side_effect=ClientConnectorError(Mock(), Mock())) + result = await send_to_paste_service(self.http_session, "") + self.assertEqual(self.http_session.post.call_count, FAILED_REQUEST_ATTEMPTS) + self.assertIsNone(result) + + async def test_general_error_handled_and_request_repeated(self): + """All `Exception`s are handled, logged and request repeated.""" + self.http_session.post = MagicMock(side_effect=Exception) + result = await send_to_paste_service(self.http_session, "") + self.assertEqual(self.http_session.post.call_count, FAILED_REQUEST_ATTEMPTS) + self.assertLogs("bot.utils", logging.ERROR) + self.assertIsNone(result) diff --git a/tests/helpers.py b/tests/helpers.py index 8e13f0f28..e47fdf28f 100644 --- a/tests/helpers.py +++ b/tests/helpers.py @@ -4,12 +4,15 @@ import collections import itertools import logging import unittest.mock -from typing import Iterable, Optional +from asyncio import AbstractEventLoop +from typing import Callable, Iterable, Optional import discord +from aiohttp import ClientSession from discord.ext.commands import Context from bot.api import APIClient +from bot.async_stats import AsyncStatsClient from bot.bot import Bot @@ -23,6 +26,24 @@ for logger in logging.Logger.manager.loggerDict.values(): logger.setLevel(logging.CRITICAL) +def autospec(target, *attributes: str, **kwargs) -> Callable: + """Patch multiple `attributes` of a `target` with autospecced mocks and `spec_set` as True.""" + # Caller's kwargs should take priority and overwrite the defaults. + kwargs = {'spec_set': True, 'autospec': True, **kwargs} + + # Import the target if it's a string. + # This is to support both object and string targets like patch.multiple. + if type(target) is str: + target = unittest.mock._importer(target) + + def decorator(func): + for attribute in attributes: + patcher = unittest.mock.patch.object(target, attribute, **kwargs) + func = patcher(func) + return func + return decorator + + class HashableMixin(discord.mixins.EqualityComparable): """ Mixin that provides similar hashing and equality functionality as discord.py's `Hashable` mixin. @@ -205,6 +226,10 @@ class MockRole(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.Mock, ColourMixin, HashableMixin): """Simplified position-based comparisons similar to those of `discord.Role`.""" return self.position < other.position + def __ge__(self, other): + """Simplified position-based comparisons similar to those of `discord.Role`.""" + return self.position >= other.position + # Create a Member instance to get a realistic Mock of `discord.Member` member_data = {'user': 'lemon', 'roles': [1]} @@ -264,10 +289,16 @@ class MockAPIClient(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.MagicMock): spec_set = APIClient -# Create a Bot instance to get a realistic MagicMock of `discord.ext.commands.Bot` -bot_instance = Bot(command_prefix=unittest.mock.MagicMock()) -bot_instance.http_session = None -bot_instance.api_client = None +def _get_mock_loop() -> unittest.mock.Mock: + """Return a mocked asyncio.AbstractEventLoop.""" + loop = unittest.mock.create_autospec(spec=AbstractEventLoop, spec_set=True) + + # Since calling `create_task` on our MockBot does not actually schedule the coroutine object + # as a task in the asyncio loop, this `side_effect` calls `close()` on the coroutine object + # to prevent "has not been awaited"-warnings. + loop.create_task.side_effect = lambda coroutine: coroutine.close() + + return loop class MockBot(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.MagicMock): @@ -277,17 +308,20 @@ class MockBot(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.MagicMock): Instances of this class will follow the specifications of `discord.ext.commands.Bot` instances. For more information, see the `MockGuild` docstring. """ - spec_set = bot_instance - additional_spec_asyncs = ("wait_for",) + spec_set = Bot( + command_prefix=unittest.mock.MagicMock(), + loop=_get_mock_loop(), + redis_session=unittest.mock.MagicMock(), + ) + additional_spec_asyncs = ("wait_for", "redis_ready") def __init__(self, **kwargs) -> None: super().__init__(**kwargs) - self.api_client = MockAPIClient() - # Since calling `create_task` on our MockBot does not actually schedule the coroutine object - # as a task in the asyncio loop, this `side_effect` calls `close()` on the coroutine object - # to prevent "has not been awaited"-warnings. - self.loop.create_task.side_effect = lambda coroutine: coroutine.close() + self.loop = _get_mock_loop() + self.api_client = MockAPIClient(loop=self.loop) + self.http_session = unittest.mock.create_autospec(spec=ClientSession, spec_set=True) + self.stats = unittest.mock.create_autospec(spec=AsyncStatsClient, spec_set=True) # Create a TextChannel instance to get a realistic MagicMock of `discord.TextChannel` @@ -315,7 +349,7 @@ class MockTextChannel(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.Mock, HashableMixin): """ spec_set = channel_instance - def __init__(self, name: str = 'channel', channel_id: int = 1, **kwargs) -> None: + def __init__(self, **kwargs) -> None: default_kwargs = {'id': next(self.discord_id), 'name': 'channel', 'guild': MockGuild()} super().__init__(**collections.ChainMap(kwargs, default_kwargs)) @@ -323,6 +357,27 @@ class MockTextChannel(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.Mock, HashableMixin): self.mention = f"#{self.name}" +# Create data for the DMChannel instance +state = unittest.mock.MagicMock() +me = unittest.mock.MagicMock() +dm_channel_data = {"id": 1, "recipients": [unittest.mock.MagicMock()]} +dm_channel_instance = discord.DMChannel(me=me, state=state, data=dm_channel_data) + + +class MockDMChannel(CustomMockMixin, unittest.mock.Mock, HashableMixin): + """ + A MagicMock subclass to mock TextChannel objects. + + Instances of this class will follow the specifications of `discord.TextChannel` instances. For + more information, see the `MockGuild` docstring. + """ + spec_set = dm_channel_instance + + def __init__(self, **kwargs) -> None: + default_kwargs = {'id': next(self.discord_id), 'recipient': MockUser(), "me": MockUser()} + super().__init__(**collections.ChainMap(kwargs, default_kwargs)) + + # Create a Message instance to get a realistic MagicMock of `discord.Message` message_data = { 'id': 1, |