diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | bot/cogs/moderation/incidents.py | 381 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | bot/constants.py | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | config-default.yml | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/bot/cogs/moderation/test_incidents.py | 741 |
5 files changed, 1137 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py b/bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py index a5c1ef362..995187ef0 100644 --- a/bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py +++ b/bot/cogs/moderation/__init__.py @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ from bot.bot import Bot +from .incidents import Incidents from .infractions import Infractions from .management import ModManagement from .modlog import ModLog @@ -8,7 +9,8 @@ from .superstarify import Superstarify def setup(bot: Bot) -> None: - """Load the Infractions, ModManagement, ModLog, Silence, Slowmode, and Superstarify cogs.""" + """Load the Incidents, Infractions, ModManagement, ModLog, Silence, Slowmode and Superstarify cogs.""" + bot.add_cog(Incidents(bot)) bot.add_cog(Infractions(bot)) bot.add_cog(ModLog(bot)) bot.add_cog(ModManagement(bot)) diff --git a/bot/cogs/moderation/incidents.py b/bot/cogs/moderation/incidents.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1a12c8bbd --- /dev/null +++ b/bot/cogs/moderation/incidents.py @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ +import asyncio +import logging +import typing as t +from datetime import datetime +from enum import Enum + +import discord +from discord.ext.commands import Cog + +from bot.bot import Bot +from bot.constants import Channels, Colours, Emojis, Roles, Webhooks +from bot.utils.messages import sub_clyde + +log = logging.getLogger(__name__) + +# Amount of messages for `crawl_task` to process at most on start-up - limited to 50 +# as in practice, there should never be this many messages, and if there are, +# something has likely gone very wrong +CRAWL_LIMIT = 50 + +# Seconds for `crawl_task` to sleep after adding reactions to a message +CRAWL_SLEEP = 2 + + +class Signal(Enum): + """ + Recognized incident status signals. + + This binds emoji to actions. The bot will only react to emoji linked here. + All other signals are seen as invalid. + """ + + ACTIONED = Emojis.incident_actioned + NOT_ACTIONED = Emojis.incident_unactioned + INVESTIGATING = Emojis.incident_investigating + + +# Reactions from roles not listed here will be removed +ALLOWED_ROLES: t.Set[int] = {Roles.moderators, Roles.admins, Roles.owners} + +# Message must have all of these emoji to pass the `has_signals` check +ALL_SIGNALS: t.Set[str] = {signal.value for signal in Signal} + + +def make_embed(incident: discord.Message, outcome: Signal, actioned_by: discord.Member) -> discord.Embed: + """ + Create an embed representation of `incident` for the #incidents-archive channel. + + The name & discriminator of `actioned_by` and `outcome` will be presented in the + embed footer. Additionally, the embed is coloured based on `outcome`. + + The author of `incident` is not shown in the embed. It is assumed that this piece + of information will be relayed in other ways, e.g. webhook username. + + As mentions in embeds do not ping, we do not need to use `incident.clean_content`. + """ + log.trace(f"Creating embed for {incident.id=}") + + if outcome is Signal.ACTIONED: + colour = Colours.soft_green + footer = f"Actioned by {actioned_by}" + else: + colour = Colours.soft_red + footer = f"Rejected by {actioned_by}" + + embed = discord.Embed( + description=incident.content, + timestamp=datetime.utcnow(), + colour=colour, + ) + embed.set_footer(text=footer, icon_url=actioned_by.avatar_url) + + return embed + + +def is_incident(message: discord.Message) -> bool: + """True if `message` qualifies as an incident, False otherwise.""" + conditions = ( + message.channel.id == Channels.incidents, # Message sent in #incidents + not message.author.bot, # Not by a bot + not message.content.startswith("#"), # Doesn't start with a hash + not message.pinned, # And isn't header + ) + return all(conditions) + + +def own_reactions(message: discord.Message) -> t.Set[str]: + """Get the set of reactions placed on `message` by the bot itself.""" + return {str(reaction.emoji) for reaction in message.reactions if reaction.me} + + +def has_signals(message: discord.Message) -> bool: + """True if `message` already has all `Signal` reactions, False otherwise.""" + return ALL_SIGNALS.issubset(own_reactions(message)) + + +async def add_signals(incident: discord.Message) -> None: + """ + Add `Signal` member emoji to `incident` as reactions. + + If the emoji has already been placed on `incident` by the bot, it will be skipped. + """ + existing_reacts = own_reactions(incident) + + for signal_emoji in Signal: + if signal_emoji.value in existing_reacts: # This would not raise, but it is a superfluous API call + log.trace(f"Skipping emoji as it's already been placed: {signal_emoji}") + else: + log.trace(f"Adding reaction: {signal_emoji}") + await incident.add_reaction(signal_emoji.value) + + +class Incidents(Cog): + """ + Automation for the #incidents channel. + + This cog does not provide a command API, it only reacts to the following events. + + On start-up: + * Crawl #incidents and add missing `Signal` emoji where appropriate + * This is to retro-actively add the available options for messages which + were sent while the bot wasn't listening + * Pinned messages and message starting with # do not qualify as incidents + * See: `crawl_incidents` + + On message: + * Add `Signal` member emoji if message qualifies as an incident + * Ignore messages starting with # + * Use this if verbal communication is necessary + * Each such message must be deleted manually once appropriate + * See: `on_message` + + On reaction: + * Remove reaction if not permitted + * User does not have any of the roles in `ALLOWED_ROLES` + * Used emoji is not a `Signal` member + * If `Signal.ACTIONED` or `Signal.NOT_ACTIONED` were chosen, attempt to + relay the incident message to #incidents-archive + * If relay successful, delete original message + * See: `on_raw_reaction_add` + + Please refer to function docstrings for implementation details. + """ + + def __init__(self, bot: Bot) -> None: + """Prepare `event_lock` and schedule `crawl_task` on start-up.""" + self.bot = bot + + self.event_lock = asyncio.Lock() + self.crawl_task = self.bot.loop.create_task(self.crawl_incidents()) + + async def crawl_incidents(self) -> None: + """ + Crawl #incidents and add missing emoji where necessary. + + This is to catch-up should an incident be reported while the bot wasn't listening. + After adding each reaction, we take a short break to avoid drowning in ratelimits. + + Once this task is scheduled, listeners that change messages should await it. + The crawl assumes that the channel history doesn't change as we go over it. + + Behaviour is configured by: `CRAWL_LIMIT`, `CRAWL_SLEEP`. + """ + await self.bot.wait_until_guild_available() + incidents: discord.TextChannel = self.bot.get_channel(Channels.incidents) + + log.debug(f"Crawling messages in #incidents: {CRAWL_LIMIT=}, {CRAWL_SLEEP=}") + async for message in incidents.history(limit=CRAWL_LIMIT): + + if not is_incident(message): + log.trace(f"Skipping message {message.id}: not an incident") + continue + + if has_signals(message): + log.trace(f"Skipping message {message.id}: already has all signals") + continue + + await add_signals(message) + await asyncio.sleep(CRAWL_SLEEP) + + log.debug("Crawl task finished!") + + async def archive(self, incident: discord.Message, outcome: Signal, actioned_by: discord.Member) -> bool: + """ + Relay an embed representation of `incident` to the #incidents-archive channel. + + The following pieces of information are relayed: + * Incident message content (as embed description) + * Incident attachment (if image, shown in archive embed) + * Incident author name (as webhook author) + * Incident author avatar (as webhook avatar) + * Resolution signal `outcome` (as embed colour & footer) + * Moderator `actioned_by` (name & discriminator shown in footer) + + If `incident` contains an attachment, we try to add it to the archive embed. There is + no handing of extensions / file types - we simply dispatch the attachment file with the + webhook, and try to display it in the embed. Testing indicates that if the attachment + cannot be displayed (e.g. a text file), it's invisible in the embed, with no error. + + Return True if the relay finishes successfully. If anything goes wrong, meaning + not all information was relayed, return False. This signals that the original + message is not safe to be deleted, as we will lose some information. + """ + log.debug(f"Archiving incident: {incident.id} (outcome: {outcome}, actioned by: {actioned_by})") + embed = make_embed(incident, outcome, actioned_by) + + # If the incident had an attachment, we will try to relay it + if incident.attachments: + attachment = incident.attachments[0] # User-sent messages can only contain one attachment + log.debug(f"Attempting to archive incident attachment: {attachment.filename}") + + attachment_file = await attachment.to_file() # The file will be sent with the webhook + embed.set_image(url=f"attachment://{attachment.filename}") # Embed displays the attached file + else: + attachment_file = None + + try: + webhook = await self.bot.fetch_webhook(Webhooks.incidents_archive) + await webhook.send( + embed=embed, + username=sub_clyde(incident.author.name), + avatar_url=incident.author.avatar_url, + file=attachment_file, + ) + except Exception: + log.exception(f"Failed to archive incident {incident.id} to #incidents-archive") + return False + else: + log.trace("Message archived successfully!") + return True + + def make_confirmation_task(self, incident: discord.Message, timeout: int = 5) -> asyncio.Task: + """ + Create a task to wait `timeout` seconds for `incident` to be deleted. + + If `timeout` passes, this will raise `asyncio.TimeoutError`, signaling that we haven't + been able to confirm that the message was deleted. + """ + log.trace(f"Confirmation task will wait {timeout=} seconds for {incident.id=} to be deleted") + + def check(payload: discord.RawReactionActionEvent) -> bool: + return payload.message_id == incident.id + + coroutine = self.bot.wait_for(event="raw_message_delete", check=check, timeout=timeout) + return self.bot.loop.create_task(coroutine) + + async def process_event(self, reaction: str, incident: discord.Message, member: discord.Member) -> None: + """ + Process a `reaction_add` event in #incidents. + + First, we check that the reaction is a recognized `Signal` member, and that it was sent by + a permitted user (at least one role in `ALLOWED_ROLES`). If not, the reaction is removed. + + If the reaction was either `Signal.ACTIONED` or `Signal.NOT_ACTIONED`, we attempt to relay + the report to #incidents-archive. If successful, the original message is deleted. + + We do not release `event_lock` until we receive the corresponding `message_delete` event. + This ensures that if there is a racing event awaiting the lock, it will fail to find the + message, and will abort. There is a `timeout` to ensure that this doesn't hold the lock + forever should something go wrong. + """ + members_roles: t.Set[int] = {role.id for role in member.roles} + if not members_roles & ALLOWED_ROLES: # Intersection is truthy on at least 1 common element + log.debug(f"Removing invalid reaction: user {member} is not permitted to send signals") + await incident.remove_reaction(reaction, member) + return + + try: + signal = Signal(reaction) + except ValueError: + log.debug(f"Removing invalid reaction: emoji {reaction} is not a valid signal") + await incident.remove_reaction(reaction, member) + return + + log.trace(f"Received signal: {signal}") + + if signal not in (Signal.ACTIONED, Signal.NOT_ACTIONED): + log.debug("Reaction was valid, but no action is currently defined for it") + return + + relay_successful = await self.archive(incident, signal, actioned_by=member) + if not relay_successful: + log.trace("Original message will not be deleted as we failed to relay it to the archive") + return + + timeout = 5 # Seconds + confirmation_task = self.make_confirmation_task(incident, timeout) + + log.trace("Deleting original message") + await incident.delete() + + log.trace(f"Awaiting deletion confirmation: {timeout=} seconds") + try: + await confirmation_task + except asyncio.TimeoutError: + log.warning(f"Did not receive incident deletion confirmation within {timeout} seconds!") + else: + log.trace("Deletion was confirmed") + + async def resolve_message(self, message_id: int) -> t.Optional[discord.Message]: + """ + Get `discord.Message` for `message_id` from cache, or API. + + We first look into the local cache to see if the message is present. + + If not, we try to fetch the message from the API. This is necessary for messages + which were sent before the bot's current session. + + In an edge-case, it is also possible that the message was already deleted, and + the API will respond with a 404. In such a case, None will be returned. + This signals that the event for `message_id` should be ignored. + """ + await self.bot.wait_until_guild_available() # First make sure that the cache is ready + log.trace(f"Resolving message for: {message_id=}") + message: t.Optional[discord.Message] = self.bot._connection._get_message(message_id) + + if message is not None: + log.trace("Message was found in cache") + return message + + log.trace("Message not found, attempting to fetch") + try: + message = await self.bot.get_channel(Channels.incidents).fetch_message(message_id) + except discord.NotFound: + log.trace("Message doesn't exist, it was likely already relayed") + except Exception: + log.exception(f"Failed to fetch message {message_id}!") + else: + log.trace("Message fetched successfully!") + return message + + @Cog.listener() + async def on_raw_reaction_add(self, payload: discord.RawReactionActionEvent) -> None: + """ + Pre-process `payload` and pass it to `process_event` if appropriate. + + We abort instantly if `payload` doesn't relate to a message sent in #incidents, + or if it was sent by a bot. + + If `payload` relates to a message in #incidents, we first ensure that `crawl_task` has + finished, to make sure we don't mutate channel state as we're crawling it. + + Next, we acquire `event_lock` - to prevent racing, events are processed one at a time. + + Once we have the lock, the `discord.Message` object for this event must be resolved. + If the lock was previously held by an event which successfully relayed the incident, + this will fail and we abort the current event. + + Finally, with both the lock and the `discord.Message` instance in our hands, we delegate + to `process_event` to handle the event. + + The justification for using a raw listener is the need to receive events for messages + which were not cached in the current session. As a result, a certain amount of + complexity is introduced, but at the moment this doesn't appear to be avoidable. + """ + if payload.channel_id != Channels.incidents or payload.member.bot: + return + + log.trace(f"Received reaction add event in #incidents, waiting for crawler: {self.crawl_task.done()=}") + await self.crawl_task + + log.trace(f"Acquiring event lock: {self.event_lock.locked()=}") + async with self.event_lock: + message = await self.resolve_message(payload.message_id) + + if message is None: + log.debug("Listener will abort as related message does not exist!") + return + + if not is_incident(message): + log.debug("Ignoring event for a non-incident message") + return + + await self.process_event(str(payload.emoji), message, payload.member) + log.trace("Releasing event lock") + + @Cog.listener() + async def on_message(self, message: discord.Message) -> None: + """Pass `message` to `add_signals` if and only if it satisfies `is_incident`.""" + if is_incident(message): + await add_signals(message) diff --git a/bot/constants.py b/bot/constants.py index a1b392c82..b3ef1660f 100644 --- a/bot/constants.py +++ b/bot/constants.py @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ class Emojis(metaclass=YAMLGetter): status_idle: str status_dnd: str + incident_actioned: str + incident_unactioned: str + incident_investigating: str + failmail: str trashcan: str @@ -399,6 +403,7 @@ class Channels(metaclass=YAMLGetter): helpers: int how_to_get_help: int incidents: int + incidents_archive: int message_log: int meta: int mod_alerts: int @@ -427,6 +432,7 @@ class Webhooks(metaclass=YAMLGetter): reddit: int duck_pond: int dev_log: int + incidents_archive: int class Roles(metaclass=YAMLGetter): diff --git a/config-default.yml b/config-default.yml index 64c4e715b..4c0196dc5 100644 --- a/config-default.yml +++ b/config-default.yml @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ style: status_dnd: "<:status_dnd:470326272082313216>" status_offline: "<:status_offline:470326266537705472>" + incident_actioned: "<:incident_actioned:719645530128646266>" + incident_unactioned: "<:incident_unactioned:719645583245180960>" + incident_investigating: "<:incident_investigating:719645658671480924>" + failmail: "<:failmail:633660039931887616>" trashcan: "<:trashcan:637136429717389331>" @@ -173,6 +177,7 @@ guild: organisation: &ORGANISATION 551789653284356126 staff_lounge: &STAFF_LOUNGE 464905259261755392 incidents: 714214212200562749 + incidents_archive: 720668923636351037 # Voice admins_voice: &ADMINS_VOICE 500734494840717332 @@ -251,7 +256,7 @@ guild: duck_pond: 637821475327311927 dev_log: 680501655111729222 python_news: &PYNEWS_WEBHOOK 704381182279942324 - + incidents_archive: 720671599790915702 filter: diff --git a/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/test_incidents.py b/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/test_incidents.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f8d479cef --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bot/cogs/moderation/test_incidents.py @@ -0,0 +1,741 @@ +import asyncio +import enum +import logging +import typing as t +import unittest +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, call, patch + +import aiohttp +import discord + +from bot.cogs.moderation import Incidents, incidents +from bot.constants import Colours +from tests.helpers import ( + MockAsyncWebhook, + MockBot, + MockMember, + MockMessage, + MockReaction, + MockRole, + MockTextChannel, + MockUser, +) + + +class MockAsyncIterable: + """ + Helper for mocking asynchronous for loops. + + It does not appear that the `unittest` library currently provides anything that would + allow us to simply mock an async iterator, such as `discord.TextChannel.history`. + + We therefore write our own helper to wrap a regular synchronous iterable, and feed + its values via `__anext__` rather than `__next__`. + + This class was written for the purposes of testing the `Incidents` cog - it may not + be generic enough to be placed in the `tests.helpers` module. + """ + + def __init__(self, messages: t.Iterable): + """Take a sync iterable to be wrapped.""" + self.iter_messages = iter(messages) + + def __aiter__(self): + """Return `self` as we provide the `__anext__` method.""" + return self + + async def __anext__(self): + """ + Feed the next item, or raise `StopAsyncIteration`. + + Since we're wrapping a sync iterator, it will communicate that it has been depleted + by raising a `StopIteration`. The `async for` construct does not expect it, and we + therefore need to substitute it for the appropriate exception type. + """ + try: + return next(self.iter_messages) + except StopIteration: + raise StopAsyncIteration + + +class MockSignal(enum.Enum): + A = "A" + B = "B" + + +mock_404 = discord.NotFound( + response=MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), # Mock the erroneous response + message="Not found", +) + + +class TestMakeEmbed(unittest.TestCase): + """Collection of tests for the `make_embed` helper function.""" + + def test_make_embed_actioned(self): + """Embed is coloured green and footer contains 'Actioned' when `outcome=Signal.ACTIONED`.""" + embed = incidents.make_embed(MockMessage(), incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(embed.colour.value, Colours.soft_green) + self.assertIn("Actioned", embed.footer.text) + + def test_make_embed_not_actioned(self): + """Embed is coloured red and footer contains 'Rejected' when `outcome=Signal.NOT_ACTIONED`.""" + embed = incidents.make_embed(MockMessage(), incidents.Signal.NOT_ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(embed.colour.value, Colours.soft_red) + self.assertIn("Rejected", embed.footer.text) + + def test_make_embed_content(self): + """Incident content appears as embed description.""" + incident = MockMessage(content="this is an incident") + embed = incidents.make_embed(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, MockMember()) + + self.assertEqual(incident.content, embed.description) + + +@patch("bot.constants.Channels.incidents", 123) +class TestIsIncident(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Collection of tests for the `is_incident` helper function. + + In `setUp`, we will create a mock message which should qualify as an incident. Each + test case will then mutate this instance to make it **not** qualify, in various ways. + + Notice that we patch the #incidents channel id globally for this class. + """ + + def setUp(self) -> None: + """Prepare a mock message which should qualify as an incident.""" + self.incident = MockMessage( + channel=MockTextChannel(id=123), + content="this is an incident", + author=MockUser(bot=False), + pinned=False, + ) + + def test_is_incident_true(self): + """Message qualifies as an incident if unchanged.""" + self.assertTrue(incidents.is_incident(self.incident)) + + def check_false(self): + """Assert that `self.incident` does **not** qualify as an incident.""" + self.assertFalse(incidents.is_incident(self.incident)) + + def test_is_incident_false_channel(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if sent outside of #incidents.""" + self.incident.channel = MockTextChannel(id=456) + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_content(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if content begins with hash symbol.""" + self.incident.content = "# this is a comment message" + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_author(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if author is a bot.""" + self.incident.author = MockUser(bot=True) + self.check_false() + + def test_is_incident_false_pinned(self): + """Message doesn't qualify if it is pinned.""" + self.incident.pinned = True + self.check_false() + + +class TestOwnReactions(unittest.TestCase): + """Assertions for the `own_reactions` function.""" + + def test_own_reactions(self): + """Only bot's own emoji are extracted from the input incident.""" + reactions = ( + MockReaction(emoji="A", me=True), + MockReaction(emoji="B", me=True), + MockReaction(emoji="C", me=False), + ) + message = MockMessage(reactions=reactions) + self.assertSetEqual(incidents.own_reactions(message), {"A", "B"}) + + +@patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.ALL_SIGNALS", {"A", "B"}) +class TestHasSignals(unittest.TestCase): + """ + Assertions for the `has_signals` function. + + We patch `ALL_SIGNALS` globally. Each test function then patches `own_reactions` + as appropriate. + """ + + def test_has_signals_true(self): + """True when `own_reactions` returns all emoji in `ALL_SIGNALS`.""" + message = MockMessage() + own_reactions = MagicMock(return_value={"A", "B"}) + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", own_reactions): + self.assertTrue(incidents.has_signals(message)) + + def test_has_signals_false(self): + """False when `own_reactions` does not return all emoji in `ALL_SIGNALS`.""" + message = MockMessage() + own_reactions = MagicMock(return_value={"A", "C"}) + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", own_reactions): + self.assertFalse(incidents.has_signals(message)) + + +@patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.Signal", MockSignal) +class TestAddSignals(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """ + Assertions for the `add_signals` coroutine. + + These are all fairly similar and could go into a single test function, but I found the + patching & sub-testing fairly awkward in that case and decided to split them up + to avoid unnecessary syntax noise. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """Prepare a mock incident message for tests to use.""" + self.incident = MockMessage() + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value=set())) + async def test_add_signals_missing(self): + """All emoji are added when none are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_has_calls([call("A"), call("B")]) + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value={"A"})) + async def test_add_signals_partial(self): + """Only missing emoji are added when some are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_has_calls([call("B")]) + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.own_reactions", MagicMock(return_value={"A", "B"})) + async def test_add_signals_present(self): + """No emoji are added when all are present.""" + await incidents.add_signals(self.incident) + self.incident.add_reaction.assert_not_called() + + +class TestIncidents(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): + """ + Tests for bound methods of the `Incidents` cog. + + Use this as a base class for `Incidents` tests - it will prepare a fresh instance + for each test function, but not make any assertions on its own. Tests can mutate + the instance as they wish. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """ + Prepare a fresh `Incidents` instance for each test. + + Note that this will not schedule `crawl_incidents` in the background, as everything + is being mocked. The `crawl_task` attribute will end up being None. + """ + self.cog_instance = Incidents(MockBot()) + + +@patch("asyncio.sleep", AsyncMock()) # Prevent the coro from sleeping to speed up the test +class TestCrawlIncidents(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.crawl_incidents` coroutine. + + Apart from `test_crawl_incidents_waits_until_cache_ready`, all tests in this class + will patch the return values of `is_incident` and `has_signal` and then observe + whether the `AsyncMock` for `add_signals` was awaited or not. + + The `add_signals` mock is added by each test separately to ensure it is clean (has not + been awaited by another test yet). The mock can be reset, but this appears to be the + cleaner way. + + For each test, we inject a mock channel with a history of 1 message only (see: `setUp`). + """ + + def setUp(self): + """For each test, ensure `bot.get_channel` returns a channel with 1 arbitrary message.""" + super().setUp() # First ensure we get `cog_instance` from parent + + incidents_history = MagicMock(return_value=MockAsyncIterable([MockMessage()])) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(history=incidents_history)) + + async def test_crawl_incidents_waits_until_cache_ready(self): + """ + The coroutine will await the `wait_until_guild_available` event. + + Since this task is schedule in the `__init__`, it is critical that it waits for the + cache to be ready, so that it can safely get the #incidents channel. + """ + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + self.cog_instance.bot.wait_until_guild_available.assert_awaited() + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)) # Message doesn't qualify + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=False)) + async def test_crawl_incidents_noop_if_is_not_incident(self): + """Signals are not added for a non-incident message.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # Message qualifies + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # But already has signals + async def test_crawl_incidents_noop_if_message_already_has_signals(self): + """Signals are not added for messages which already have them.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_not_awaited() + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) # Message qualifies + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.has_signals", MagicMock(return_value=False)) # And doesn't have signals + async def test_crawl_incidents_add_signals_called(self): + """Message has signals added as it does not have them yet and qualifies as an incident.""" + await self.cog_instance.crawl_incidents() + incidents.add_signals.assert_awaited_once() + + +class TestArchive(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.archive` coroutine.""" + + async def test_archive_webhook_not_found(self): + """ + Method recovers and returns False when the webhook is not found. + + Implicitly, this also tests that the error is handled internally and doesn't + propagate out of the method, which is just as important. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404) + self.assertFalse( + await self.cog_instance.archive(incident=MockMessage(), outcome=MagicMock(), actioned_by=MockMember()) + ) + + async def test_archive_relays_incident(self): + """ + If webhook is found, method relays `incident` properly. + + This test will assert that the fetched webhook's `send` method is fed the correct arguments, + and that the `archive` method returns True. + """ + webhook = MockAsyncWebhook() + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(return_value=webhook) # Patch in our webhook + + # Define our own `incident` for archivation + incident = MockMessage( + content="this is an incident", + author=MockUser(name="author_name", avatar_url="author_avatar"), + id=123, + attachments=[], # This incident has no attachments + ) + built_embed = MagicMock(discord.Embed, id=123) # We patch `make_embed` to return this + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.make_embed", MagicMock(return_value=built_embed)): + archive_return = await self.cog_instance.archive(incident, MagicMock(value="A"), MockMember()) + + # Now we check that the webhook was given the correct args, and that `archive` returned True + webhook.send.assert_called_once_with( + embed=built_embed, + username="author_name", + avatar_url="author_avatar", + file=None, + ) + self.assertTrue(archive_return) + + async def test_archive_relays_incident_with_attachments(self): + """ + Incident attachments are relayed and displayed in the embed. + + This test asserts the two things that need to happen in order to relay the attachment. + The embed returned by `make_embed` must have the `set_image` method called with the + attachment's filename, and the file must be passed to the webhook's send method. + """ + attachment_file = MagicMock(discord.File) + attachment = MagicMock( + discord.Attachment, + filename="abc.png", + to_file=AsyncMock(return_value=attachment_file), + ) + incident = MockMessage( + attachments=[attachment], + ) + built_embed = MagicMock(discord.Embed) + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.make_embed", MagicMock(return_value=built_embed)): + await self.cog_instance.archive(incident, incidents.Signal.ACTIONED, actioned_by=MockMember()) + + built_embed.set_image.assert_called_once_with(url="attachment://abc.png") + + send_kwargs = self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook.return_value.send.call_args.kwargs + self.assertIn("file", send_kwargs) + self.assertIs(send_kwargs["file"], attachment_file) + + async def test_archive_clyde_username(self): + """ + The archive webhook username is cleansed using `sub_clyde`. + + Discord will reject any webhook with "clyde" in the username field, as it impersonates + the official Clyde bot. Since we do not control what the username will be (the incident + author name is used), we must ensure the name is cleansed, otherwise the relay may fail. + + This test assumes the username is passed as a kwarg. If this test fails, please review + whether the passed argument is being retrieved correctly. + """ + webhook = MockAsyncWebhook() + self.cog_instance.bot.fetch_webhook = AsyncMock(return_value=webhook) + + message_from_clyde = MockMessage(author=MockUser(name="clyde the great")) + await self.cog_instance.archive(message_from_clyde, MagicMock(incidents.Signal), MockMember()) + + self.assertNotIn("clyde", webhook.send.call_args.kwargs["username"]) + + +class TestMakeConfirmationTask(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.make_confirmation_task` method. + + Writing tests for this method is difficult, as it mostly just delegates the provided + information elsewhere. There is very little internal logic. Whether our approach + works conceptually is difficult to prove using unit tests. + """ + + def test_make_confirmation_task_check(self): + """ + The internal check will recognize the passed incident. + + This is a little tricky - we first pass a message with a specific `id` in, and then + retrieve the built check from the `call_args` of the `wait_for` method. This relies + on the check being passed as a kwarg. + + Once the check is retrieved, we assert that it gives True for our incident's `id`, + and False for any other. + + If this function begins to fail, first check that `created_check` is being retrieved + correctly. It should be the function that is built locally in the tested method. + """ + self.cog_instance.make_confirmation_task(MockMessage(id=123)) + + self.cog_instance.bot.wait_for.assert_called_once() + created_check = self.cog_instance.bot.wait_for.call_args.kwargs["check"] + + # The `message_id` matches the `id` of our incident + self.assertTrue(created_check(payload=MagicMock(message_id=123))) + + # This `message_id` does not match + self.assertFalse(created_check(payload=MagicMock(message_id=0))) + + +@patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.ALLOWED_ROLES", {1, 2}) +@patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", AsyncMock()) # Generic awaitable +class TestProcessEvent(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.process_event` coroutine.""" + + async def test_process_event_bad_role(self): + """The reaction is removed when the author lacks all allowed roles.""" + incident = MockMessage() + member = MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=0)]) # Must have role 1 or 2 + + await self.cog_instance.process_event("reaction", incident, member) + incident.remove_reaction.assert_called_once_with("reaction", member) + + async def test_process_event_bad_emoji(self): + """ + The reaction is removed when an invalid emoji is used. + + This requires that we pass in a `member` with valid roles, as we need the role check + to succeed. + """ + incident = MockMessage() + member = MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) # Member has allowed role + + await self.cog_instance.process_event("invalid_signal", incident, member) + incident.remove_reaction.assert_called_once_with("invalid_signal", member) + + async def test_process_event_no_archive_on_investigating(self): + """Message is not archived on `Signal.INVESTIGATING`.""" + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.Incidents.archive", AsyncMock()) as mocked_archive: + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.INVESTIGATING.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]), + ) + + mocked_archive.assert_not_called() + + async def test_process_event_no_delete_if_archive_fails(self): + """ + Original message is not deleted when `Incidents.archive` returns False. + + This is the way of signaling that the relay failed, and we should not remove the original, + as that would result in losing the incident record. + """ + incident = MockMessage() + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.Incidents.archive", AsyncMock(return_value=False)): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=incident, + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + + incident.delete.assert_not_called() + + async def test_process_event_confirmation_task_is_awaited(self): + """Task given by `Incidents.make_confirmation_task` is awaited before method exits.""" + mock_task = AsyncMock() + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", mock_task): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + + mock_task.assert_awaited() + + async def test_process_event_confirmation_task_timeout_is_handled(self): + """ + Confirmation task `asyncio.TimeoutError` is handled gracefully. + + We have `make_confirmation_task` return a mock with a side effect, and then catch the + exception should it propagate out of `process_event`. This is so that we can then manually + fail the test with a more informative message than just the plain traceback. + """ + mock_task = AsyncMock(side_effect=asyncio.TimeoutError()) + + try: + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.Incidents.make_confirmation_task", mock_task): + await self.cog_instance.process_event( + reaction=incidents.Signal.ACTIONED.value, + incident=MockMessage(), + member=MockMember(roles=[MockRole(id=1)]) + ) + except asyncio.TimeoutError: + self.fail("TimeoutError was not handled gracefully, and propagated out of `process_event`!") + + +class TestResolveMessage(TestIncidents): + """Tests for the `Incidents.resolve_message` coroutine.""" + + async def test_resolve_message_pass_message_id(self): + """Method will call `_get_message` with the passed `message_id`.""" + await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message.assert_called_once_with(123) + + async def test_resolve_message_in_cache(self): + """ + No API call is made if the queried message exists in the cache. + + We mock the `_get_message` return value regardless of input. Whether it finds the message + internally is considered d.py's responsibility, not ours. + """ + cached_message = MockMessage(id=123) + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=cached_message) + + return_value = await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + + self.assertIs(return_value, cached_message) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel.assert_not_called() # The `fetch_message` line was never hit + + async def test_resolve_message_not_in_cache(self): + """ + The message is retrieved from the API if it isn't cached. + + This is desired behaviour for messages which exist, but were sent before the bot's + current session. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + # API returns our message + uncached_message = MockMessage() + fetch_message = AsyncMock(return_value=uncached_message) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + retrieved_message = await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123) + self.assertIs(retrieved_message, uncached_message) + + async def test_resolve_message_doesnt_exist(self): + """ + If the API returns a 404, the function handles it gracefully and returns None. + + This is an edge-case happening with racing events - event A will relay the message + to the archive and delete the original. Once event B acquires the `event_lock`, + it will not find the message in the cache, and will ask the API. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + fetch_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=mock_404) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + self.assertIsNone(await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123)) + + async def test_resolve_message_fetch_fails(self): + """ + Non-404 errors are handled, logged & None is returned. + + In contrast with a 404, this should make an error-level log. We assert that at least + one such log was made - we do not make any assertions about the log's message. + """ + self.cog_instance.bot._connection._get_message = MagicMock(return_value=None) # Cache returns None + + arbitrary_error = discord.HTTPException( + response=MagicMock(aiohttp.ClientResponse), + message="Arbitrary error", + ) + fetch_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=arbitrary_error) + self.cog_instance.bot.get_channel = MagicMock(return_value=MockTextChannel(fetch_message=fetch_message)) + + with self.assertLogs(logger=incidents.log, level=logging.ERROR): + self.assertIsNone(await self.cog_instance.resolve_message(123)) + + +@patch("bot.constants.Channels.incidents", 123) +class TestOnRawReactionAdd(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.on_raw_reaction_add` listener. + + Writing tests for this listener comes with additional complexity due to the listener + awaiting the `crawl_task` task. See `asyncSetUp` for further details, which attempts + to make unit testing this function possible. + """ + + def setUp(self): + """ + Prepare & assign `payload` attribute. + + This attribute represents an *ideal* payload which will not be rejected by the + listener. As each test will receive a fresh instance, it can be mutated to + observe how the listener's behaviour changes with different attributes on + the passed payload. + """ + super().setUp() # Ensure `cog_instance` is assigned + + self.payload = MagicMock( + discord.RawReactionActionEvent, + channel_id=123, # Patched at class level + message_id=456, + member=MockMember(bot=False), + emoji="reaction", + ) + + async def asyncSetUp(self): # noqa: N802 + """ + Prepare an empty task and assign it as `crawl_task`. + + It appears that the `unittest` framework does not provide anything for mocking + asyncio tasks. An `AsyncMock` instance can be called and then awaited, however, + it does not provide the `done` method or any other parts of the `asyncio.Task` + interface. + + Although we do not need to make any assertions about the task itself while + testing the listener, the code will still await it and call the `done` method, + and so we must inject something that will not fail on either action. + + Note that this is done in an `asyncSetUp`, which runs after `setUp`. + The justification is that creating an actual task requires the event + loop to be ready, which is not the case in the `setUp`. + """ + mock_task = asyncio.create_task(AsyncMock()()) # Mock async func, then a coro + self.cog_instance.crawl_task = mock_task + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_wrong_channel(self): + """ + Events outside of #incidents will be ignored. + + We check this by asserting that `resolve_message` was never queried. + """ + self.payload.channel_id = 0 + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_user_is_bot(self): + """ + Events dispatched by bot accounts will be ignored. + + We check this by asserting that `resolve_message` was never queried. + """ + self.payload.member = MockMember(bot=True) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock() + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.resolve_message.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_message_doesnt_exist(self): + """ + Listener gracefully handles the case where `resolve_message` gives None. + + We check this by asserting that `process_event` was never called. + """ + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=None) + + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_message_is_not_an_incident(self): + """ + The event won't be processed if the related message is not an incident. + + This is an edge-case that can happen if someone manually leaves a reaction + on a pinned message, or a comment. + + We check this by asserting that `process_event` was never called. + """ + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=MockMessage()) + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)): + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_not_called() + + async def test_on_raw_reaction_add_valid_event_is_processed(self): + """ + If the reaction event is valid, it is passed to `process_event`. + + This is the case when everything goes right: + * The reaction was placed in #incidents, and not by a bot + * The message was found successfully + * The message qualifies as an incident + + Additionally, we check that all arguments were passed as expected. + """ + incident = MockMessage(id=1) + + self.cog_instance.process_event = AsyncMock() + self.cog_instance.resolve_message = AsyncMock(return_value=incident) + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)): + await self.cog_instance.on_raw_reaction_add(self.payload) + + self.cog_instance.process_event.assert_called_with( + "reaction", # Defined in `self.payload` + incident, + self.payload.member, + ) + + +class TestOnMessage(TestIncidents): + """ + Tests for the `Incidents.on_message` listener. + + Notice the decorators mocking the `is_incident` return value. The `is_incidents` + function is tested in `TestIsIncident` - here we do not worry about it. + """ + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=True)) + async def test_on_message_incident(self): + """Messages qualifying as incidents are passed to `add_signals`.""" + incident = MockMessage() + + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) as mock_add_signals: + await self.cog_instance.on_message(incident) + + mock_add_signals.assert_called_once_with(incident) + + @patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.is_incident", MagicMock(return_value=False)) + async def test_on_message_non_incident(self): + """Messages not qualifying as incidents are ignored.""" + with patch("bot.cogs.moderation.incidents.add_signals", AsyncMock()) as mock_add_signals: + await self.cog_instance.on_message(MockMessage()) + + mock_add_signals.assert_not_called() |