aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar scragly <[email protected]>2019-12-13 15:16:33 +1000
committerGravatar GitHub <[email protected]>2019-12-13 15:16:33 +1000
commit730931bc03ba68278a48fe865a8f80689c6e608e (patch)
tree748e2beb10a956bbb82f9fb3c8102bb78c4774d8
parentRevert "Revert "Use OAuth to be Reddit API compliant"" (diff)
parentMerge pull request #694 from python-discord/enh/mod/534/no-ping-dm-fail (diff)
Merge branch 'master' into revert-695-revert-510-reddit-api-oauth
-rw-r--r--bot/cogs/clean.py62
-rw-r--r--bot/cogs/moderation/scheduler.py5
-rw-r--r--bot/cogs/verification.py16
-rw-r--r--bot/constants.py2
-rw-r--r--bot/utils/time.py11
-rw-r--r--config-default.yml2
-rw-r--r--tests/bot/utils/test_time.py162
7 files changed, 233 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/bot/cogs/clean.py b/bot/cogs/clean.py
index c7168122d..2104efe57 100644
--- a/bot/cogs/clean.py
+++ b/bot/cogs/clean.py
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import random
import re
from typing import Optional
-from discord import Colour, Embed, Message, User
+from discord import Colour, Embed, Message, TextChannel, User
from discord.ext.commands import Cog, Context, group
from bot.bot import Bot
@@ -38,9 +38,13 @@ class Clean(Cog):
return self.bot.get_cog("ModLog")
async def _clean_messages(
- self, amount: int, ctx: Context,
- bots_only: bool = False, user: User = None,
- regex: Optional[str] = None
+ self,
+ amount: int,
+ ctx: Context,
+ bots_only: bool = False,
+ user: User = None,
+ regex: Optional[str] = None,
+ channel: Optional[TextChannel] = None
) -> None:
"""A helper function that does the actual message cleaning."""
def predicate_bots_only(message: Message) -> bool:
@@ -105,6 +109,10 @@ class Clean(Cog):
else:
predicate = None # Delete all messages
+ # Default to using the invoking context's channel
+ if not channel:
+ channel = ctx.channel
+
# Look through the history and retrieve message data
messages = []
message_ids = []
@@ -112,7 +120,7 @@ class Clean(Cog):
invocation_deleted = False
# To account for the invocation message, we index `amount + 1` messages.
- async for message in ctx.channel.history(limit=amount + 1):
+ async for message in channel.history(limit=amount + 1):
# If at any point the cancel command is invoked, we should stop.
if not self.cleaning:
@@ -136,7 +144,7 @@ class Clean(Cog):
self.mod_log.ignore(Event.message_delete, *message_ids)
# Use bulk delete to actually do the cleaning. It's far faster.
- await ctx.channel.purge(
+ await channel.purge(
limit=amount,
check=predicate
)
@@ -156,7 +164,7 @@ class Clean(Cog):
# Build the embed and send it
message = (
- f"**{len(message_ids)}** messages deleted in <#{ctx.channel.id}> by **{ctx.author.name}**\n\n"
+ f"**{len(message_ids)}** messages deleted in <#{channel.id}> by **{ctx.author.name}**\n\n"
f"A log of the deleted messages can be found [here]({log_url})."
)
@@ -168,7 +176,7 @@ class Clean(Cog):
channel_id=Channels.modlog,
)
- @group(invoke_without_command=True, name="clean", hidden=True)
+ @group(invoke_without_command=True, name="clean", aliases=["purge"])
@with_role(*MODERATION_ROLES)
async def clean_group(self, ctx: Context) -> None:
"""Commands for cleaning messages in channels."""
@@ -176,27 +184,49 @@ class Clean(Cog):
@clean_group.command(name="user", aliases=["users"])
@with_role(*MODERATION_ROLES)
- async def clean_user(self, ctx: Context, user: User, amount: int = 10) -> None:
+ async def clean_user(
+ self,
+ ctx: Context,
+ user: User,
+ amount: Optional[int] = 10,
+ channel: TextChannel = None
+ ) -> None:
"""Delete messages posted by the provided user, stop cleaning after traversing `amount` messages."""
- await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, user=user)
+ await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, user=user, channel=channel)
@clean_group.command(name="all", aliases=["everything"])
@with_role(*MODERATION_ROLES)
- async def clean_all(self, ctx: Context, amount: int = 10) -> None:
+ async def clean_all(
+ self,
+ ctx: Context,
+ amount: Optional[int] = 10,
+ channel: TextChannel = None
+ ) -> None:
"""Delete all messages, regardless of poster, stop cleaning after traversing `amount` messages."""
- await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx)
+ await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, channel=channel)
@clean_group.command(name="bots", aliases=["bot"])
@with_role(*MODERATION_ROLES)
- async def clean_bots(self, ctx: Context, amount: int = 10) -> None:
+ async def clean_bots(
+ self,
+ ctx: Context,
+ amount: Optional[int] = 10,
+ channel: TextChannel = None
+ ) -> None:
"""Delete all messages posted by a bot, stop cleaning after traversing `amount` messages."""
- await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, bots_only=True)
+ await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, bots_only=True, channel=channel)
@clean_group.command(name="regex", aliases=["word", "expression"])
@with_role(*MODERATION_ROLES)
- async def clean_regex(self, ctx: Context, regex: str, amount: int = 10) -> None:
+ async def clean_regex(
+ self,
+ ctx: Context,
+ regex: str,
+ amount: Optional[int] = 10,
+ channel: TextChannel = None
+ ) -> None:
"""Delete all messages that match a certain regex, stop cleaning after traversing `amount` messages."""
- await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, regex=regex)
+ await self._clean_messages(amount, ctx, regex=regex, channel=channel)
@clean_group.command(name="stop", aliases=["cancel", "abort"])
@with_role(*MODERATION_ROLES)
diff --git a/bot/cogs/moderation/scheduler.py b/bot/cogs/moderation/scheduler.py
index 2dd0bf40e..01e4b1fe7 100644
--- a/bot/cogs/moderation/scheduler.py
+++ b/bot/cogs/moderation/scheduler.py
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ class InfractionScheduler(Scheduler):
dm_result = ":incoming_envelope: "
dm_log_text = "\nDM: Sent"
else:
+ dm_result = f"{constants.Emojis.failmail} "
dm_log_text = "\nDM: **Failed**"
- log_content = ctx.author.mention
if infraction["actor"] == self.bot.user.id:
log.trace(
@@ -255,8 +255,7 @@ class InfractionScheduler(Scheduler):
if log_text.get("DM") == "Sent":
dm_emoji = ":incoming_envelope: "
elif "DM" in log_text:
- # Mention the actor because the DM failed to send.
- log_content = ctx.author.mention
+ dm_emoji = f"{constants.Emojis.failmail} "
# Accordingly display whether the pardon failed.
if "Failure" in log_text:
diff --git a/bot/cogs/verification.py b/bot/cogs/verification.py
index b32b9a29e..988e0d49a 100644
--- a/bot/cogs/verification.py
+++ b/bot/cogs/verification.py
@@ -10,9 +10,10 @@ from bot.cogs.moderation import ModLog
from bot.constants import (
Bot as BotConfig,
Channels, Colours, Event,
- Filter, Icons, Roles
+ Filter, Icons, MODERATION_ROLES, Roles
)
from bot.decorators import InChannelCheckFailure, in_channel, without_role
+from bot.utils.checks import without_role_check
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ PERIODIC_PING = (
f"@everyone To verify that you have read our rules, please type `{BotConfig.prefix}accept`."
f" If you encounter any problems during the verification process, ping the <@&{Roles.admin}> role in this channel."
)
+BOT_MESSAGE_DELETE_DELAY = 10
class Verification(Cog):
@@ -55,12 +57,16 @@ class Verification(Cog):
@Cog.listener()
async def on_message(self, message: Message) -> None:
"""Check new message event for messages to the checkpoint channel & process."""
- if message.author.bot:
- return # They're a bot, ignore
-
if message.channel.id != Channels.verification:
return # Only listen for #checkpoint messages
+ if message.author.bot:
+ # They're a bot, delete their message after the delay.
+ # But not the periodic ping; we like that one.
+ if message.content != PERIODIC_PING:
+ await message.delete(delay=BOT_MESSAGE_DELETE_DELAY)
+ return
+
# if a user mentions a role or guild member
# alert the mods in mod-alerts channel
if message.mentions or message.role_mentions:
@@ -190,7 +196,7 @@ class Verification(Cog):
@staticmethod
def bot_check(ctx: Context) -> bool:
"""Block any command within the verification channel that is not !accept."""
- if ctx.channel.id == Channels.verification:
+ if ctx.channel.id == Channels.verification and without_role_check(ctx, *MODERATION_ROLES):
return ctx.command.name == "accept"
else:
return True
diff --git a/bot/constants.py b/bot/constants.py
index ed85adf6a..8815ab983 100644
--- a/bot/constants.py
+++ b/bot/constants.py
@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ class Emojis(metaclass=YAMLGetter):
status_idle: str
status_dnd: str
+ failmail: str
+
bullet: str
new: str
pencil: str
diff --git a/bot/utils/time.py b/bot/utils/time.py
index ac64865d6..7416f36e0 100644
--- a/bot/utils/time.py
+++ b/bot/utils/time.py
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def format_infraction(timestamp: str) -> str:
def format_infraction_with_duration(
expiry: Optional[str],
- date_from: datetime.datetime = None,
+ date_from: Optional[datetime.datetime] = None,
max_units: int = 2
) -> Optional[str]:
"""
@@ -140,10 +140,15 @@ def format_infraction_with_duration(
return f"{expiry_formatted}{duration_formatted}"
-def until_expiration(expiry: Optional[str], max_units: int = 2) -> Optional[str]:
+def until_expiration(
+ expiry: Optional[str],
+ now: Optional[datetime.datetime] = None,
+ max_units: int = 2
+) -> Optional[str]:
"""
Get the remaining time until infraction's expiration, in a human-readable version of the relativedelta.
+ Returns a human-readable version of the remaining duration between datetime.utcnow() and an expiry.
Unlike `humanize_delta`, this function will force the `precision` to be `seconds` by not passing it.
`max_units` specifies the maximum number of units of time to include (e.g. 1 may include days but not hours).
By default, max_units is 2.
@@ -151,7 +156,7 @@ def until_expiration(expiry: Optional[str], max_units: int = 2) -> Optional[str]
if not expiry:
return None
- now = datetime.datetime.utcnow()
+ now = now or datetime.datetime.utcnow()
since = dateutil.parser.isoparse(expiry).replace(tzinfo=None, microsecond=0)
if since < now:
diff --git a/config-default.yml b/config-default.yml
index e6f0fda21..6ae07da93 100644
--- a/config-default.yml
+++ b/config-default.yml
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ style:
status_dnd: "<:status_dnd:470326272082313216>"
status_offline: "<:status_offline:470326266537705472>"
+ failmail: "<:failmail:633660039931887616>"
+
bullet: "\u2022"
pencil: "\u270F"
new: "\U0001F195"
diff --git a/tests/bot/utils/test_time.py b/tests/bot/utils/test_time.py
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..69f35f2f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bot/utils/test_time.py
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+import asyncio
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timezone
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta
+
+from bot.utils import time
+from tests.helpers import AsyncMock
+
+
+class TimeTests(unittest.TestCase):
+ """Test helper functions in bot.utils.time."""
+
+ def test_humanize_delta_handle_unknown_units(self):
+ """humanize_delta should be able to handle unknown units, and will not abort."""
+ # Does not abort for unknown units, as the unit name is checked
+ # against the attribute of the relativedelta instance.
+ self.assertEqual(time.humanize_delta(relativedelta(days=2, hours=2), 'elephants', 2), '2 days and 2 hours')
+
+ def test_humanize_delta_handle_high_units(self):
+ """humanize_delta should be able to handle very high units."""
+ # Very high maximum units, but it only ever iterates over
+ # each value the relativedelta might have.
+ self.assertEqual(time.humanize_delta(relativedelta(days=2, hours=2), 'hours', 20), '2 days and 2 hours')
+
+ def test_humanize_delta_should_normal_usage(self):
+ """Testing humanize delta."""
+ test_cases = (
+ (relativedelta(days=2), 'seconds', 1, '2 days'),
+ (relativedelta(days=2, hours=2), 'seconds', 2, '2 days and 2 hours'),
+ (relativedelta(days=2, hours=2), 'seconds', 1, '2 days'),
+ (relativedelta(days=2, hours=2), 'days', 2, '2 days'),
+ )
+
+ for delta, precision, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(delta=delta, precision=precision, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.humanize_delta(delta, precision, max_units), expected)
+
+ def test_humanize_delta_raises_for_invalid_max_units(self):
+ """humanize_delta should raises ValueError('max_units must be positive') for invalid max_units."""
+ test_cases = (-1, 0)
+
+ for max_units in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(max_units=max_units), self.assertRaises(ValueError) as error:
+ time.humanize_delta(relativedelta(days=2, hours=2), 'hours', max_units)
+ self.assertEqual(str(error), 'max_units must be positive')
+
+ def test_parse_rfc1123(self):
+ """Testing parse_rfc1123."""
+ self.assertEqual(
+ time.parse_rfc1123('Sun, 15 Sep 2019 12:00:00 GMT'),
+ datetime(2019, 9, 15, 12, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+ )
+
+ def test_format_infraction(self):
+ """Testing format_infraction."""
+ self.assertEqual(time.format_infraction('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z'), '2019-12-12 00:01')
+
+ @patch('asyncio.sleep', new_callable=AsyncMock)
+ def test_wait_until(self, mock):
+ """Testing wait_until."""
+ start = datetime(2019, 1, 1, 0, 0)
+ then = datetime(2019, 1, 1, 0, 10)
+
+ # No return value
+ self.assertIs(asyncio.run(time.wait_until(then, start)), None)
+
+ mock.assert_called_once_with(10 * 60)
+
+ def test_format_infraction_with_duration_none_expiry(self):
+ """format_infraction_with_duration should work for None expiry."""
+ test_cases = (
+ (None, None, None, None),
+
+ # To make sure that date_from and max_units are not touched
+ (None, 'Why hello there!', None, None),
+ (None, None, float('inf'), None),
+ (None, 'Why hello there!', float('inf'), None),
+ )
+
+ for expiry, date_from, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(expiry=expiry, date_from=date_from, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.format_infraction_with_duration(expiry, date_from, max_units), expected)
+
+ def test_format_infraction_with_duration_custom_units(self):
+ """format_infraction_with_duration should work for custom max_units."""
+ test_cases = (
+ ('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 12, 5, 5), 6,
+ '2019-12-12 00:01 (11 hours, 55 minutes and 55 seconds)'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:09:00Z', datetime(2019, 4, 25, 20, 15), 20,
+ '2019-11-23 20:09 (6 months, 28 days, 23 hours and 54 minutes)')
+ )
+
+ for expiry, date_from, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(expiry=expiry, date_from=date_from, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.format_infraction_with_duration(expiry, date_from, max_units), expected)
+
+ def test_format_infraction_with_duration_normal_usage(self):
+ """format_infraction_with_duration should work for normal usage, across various durations."""
+ test_cases = (
+ ('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 12, 0, 5), 2, '2019-12-12 00:01 (12 hours and 55 seconds)'),
+ ('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 12, 0, 5), 1, '2019-12-12 00:01 (12 hours)'),
+ ('2019-12-12T00:00:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 23, 59), 2, '2019-12-12 00:00 (1 minute)'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:09:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 15, 20, 15), 2, '2019-11-23 20:09 (7 days and 23 hours)'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:09:00Z', datetime(2019, 4, 25, 20, 15), 2, '2019-11-23 20:09 (6 months and 28 days)'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:58:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 23, 20, 53), 2, '2019-11-23 20:58 (5 minutes)'),
+ ('2019-11-24T00:00:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 23, 23, 59, 0), 2, '2019-11-24 00:00 (1 minute)'),
+ ('2019-11-23T23:59:00Z', datetime(2017, 7, 21, 23, 0), 2, '2019-11-23 23:59 (2 years and 4 months)'),
+ ('2019-11-23T23:59:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 23, 23, 49, 5), 2,
+ '2019-11-23 23:59 (9 minutes and 55 seconds)'),
+ (None, datetime(2019, 11, 23, 23, 49, 5), 2, None),
+ )
+
+ for expiry, date_from, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(expiry=expiry, date_from=date_from, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.format_infraction_with_duration(expiry, date_from, max_units), expected)
+
+ def test_until_expiration_with_duration_none_expiry(self):
+ """until_expiration should work for None expiry."""
+ test_cases = (
+ (None, None, None, None),
+
+ # To make sure that now and max_units are not touched
+ (None, 'Why hello there!', None, None),
+ (None, None, float('inf'), None),
+ (None, 'Why hello there!', float('inf'), None),
+ )
+
+ for expiry, now, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(expiry=expiry, now=now, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.until_expiration(expiry, now, max_units), expected)
+
+ def test_until_expiration_with_duration_custom_units(self):
+ """until_expiration should work for custom max_units."""
+ test_cases = (
+ ('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 12, 5, 5), 6, '11 hours, 55 minutes and 55 seconds'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:09:00Z', datetime(2019, 4, 25, 20, 15), 20, '6 months, 28 days, 23 hours and 54 minutes')
+ )
+
+ for expiry, now, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(expiry=expiry, now=now, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.until_expiration(expiry, now, max_units), expected)
+
+ def test_until_expiration_normal_usage(self):
+ """until_expiration should work for normal usage, across various durations."""
+ test_cases = (
+ ('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 12, 0, 5), 2, '12 hours and 55 seconds'),
+ ('2019-12-12T00:01:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 12, 0, 5), 1, '12 hours'),
+ ('2019-12-12T00:00:00Z', datetime(2019, 12, 11, 23, 59), 2, '1 minute'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:09:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 15, 20, 15), 2, '7 days and 23 hours'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:09:00Z', datetime(2019, 4, 25, 20, 15), 2, '6 months and 28 days'),
+ ('2019-11-23T20:58:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 23, 20, 53), 2, '5 minutes'),
+ ('2019-11-24T00:00:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 23, 23, 59, 0), 2, '1 minute'),
+ ('2019-11-23T23:59:00Z', datetime(2017, 7, 21, 23, 0), 2, '2 years and 4 months'),
+ ('2019-11-23T23:59:00Z', datetime(2019, 11, 23, 23, 49, 5), 2, '9 minutes and 55 seconds'),
+ (None, datetime(2019, 11, 23, 23, 49, 5), 2, None),
+ )
+
+ for expiry, now, max_units, expected in test_cases:
+ with self.subTest(expiry=expiry, now=now, max_units=max_units, expected=expected):
+ self.assertEqual(time.until_expiration(expiry, now, max_units), expected)